The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
54 votes

Transitioning To Rand Paul 2016 Now... Who Is With Me?

Romney's goose is cooked.

I Am Officially Transitioning To RAND PAUL 2016 now...

Who is with me?


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Go away and start your daily Rand... or FOAD!

When Fascism goes to sleep, it checks under the bed for Ron Paul!

I'm excited about this.

The stars seem to be aligning.

Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875 - "The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the People v. The Banks."


Sorry, not with you. Rand has been promulgating a lot of statist rhetoric. We don't need another "Republican in Good Standing". What we need are more people like his father.

So long as he continues to be the way he has been, he will never receive money or a vote from me.

"The casualty of partisanship is objectivity."

What statist rhetoric?


"The truth is that neither British nor American imperialism was or is idealistic. It has always been driven by economic or strategic interests." - Charlie Reese

It Looks Like A Lot Of People Are With You...

Rand Paul is at 91% in this poll... lets make it higher.

We need to get an early start on 2016: Support Rand PAC 2016

I'm all in.

Nobody better in my opinion.

People can nit pick, but we can't win if go all hard core, and alienate people, we have to be somewhat moderate, but know that when the chips are down, Rand will side with liberty.

Rand should say almost anything to get elected, and then be a hardcore libertarian once elected.

The other parties lie to get elected, and then hose the American people.

We could stretch the truth of our intent, but then help the American people once elected.

Need a web designer and/or webmaster? Are you talking of an

info share and commincation site like the DP here? I don't know chyt about web design - maybe I could steepen the learning curve via Wed Page Design For Dummies? Maybe Nystrom would give some aid, pointers, etc. Anyway, since the GOP nipped the grassroots thing in he bud, maybe we could ask or encourage through his official web site.

Speaking Of Transitioning To Rand Paul 2016...

...this website made me LOL. It's awesome.

We need to get an early start on 2016: Support Rand PAC 2016

Debbie's picture

Wow, that's amazing!!

It even has a wall clock lol


I didn't even know they made

I didn't even know they made those for Ron Paul. LOL.

We need to get an early start on 2016: Support Rand PAC 2016

Rand desires to Reward Illegal Aliens by pandering

a path to citizenship, so he will get zero support from me, period! He had better quit playing the 'go along to get along' or he has ZERO chance of being the GOP nominee. He obviously can't be very smart, as the majority only are here for the 'free ride' and most detest at the notion of citizenship, as they have been taght the Reconquista de Atzlan, where they believe they will take back their land sold out by the gringo Spaniard Santa Anna. If you know any just ask them, they will tell you and laugh at how they are getting over on the stupid gringos. They are taught this from early age and in their school books, which I have seen and read for myself. Rand needs to have a Jefferson awakening really quick or he will become an Also Rand, like the other corporate collectivists from both parties. His time to stand true to Constiutional principles and part from the NWO programs of the dying GOP is NOW! Instead, he wants to pander like a whimp to the power elite!!!

You are promoting a lie from the MSM.

Since when have they become your trusted source for news?

Rand merely wishes to simplify the complex federal code.


So, what Rand means by 'Simplify' is,

that he wants to make it 'Simple' for them to be rewarded for invading our country? He wants to reward those who have taken advantage of our system for 10's of years? How about making the law 'Simple' for them to understand, you entered our country illegally, you deserve absoulutely nothing from our government, and if caught without having papers trying to become a citizen you will be deported immediately! If you lived in a border state where we are overrun with illegals you would understand, but apparently you don't! These people are here for a 'free ride', and if you pander to them, things will only get worse, rather than better. They will always side with the socialist class, the Democrats, who give them the free government welfare, and are never going to vote GOP, unless they continue in that direction as they did with their Medicare fiasco. We don't need people who come from a failed 3rd world country to easily become citizens, they will only vote for those who give them free handouts, and never those who believe in personal self preservation by working for your standard in society. Pandering is a statist method, pressing the law is a constitutional one. If he wants to pander, he should become a Democrat, or just become a collectivist like the rest of the GOP!

'Simplify', huh? What does

'Simplify', huh? What does that even mean?

"The casualty of partisanship is objectivity."

Why would you follow the process if it causes you to be deported

Those who are here legally documented are the one's most likely to be deported.

And yet they are bankrupted by the process if they follow it properly.

And the first time they want to return home for a funeral they are denied re-entry.. it says "Not valid for reentry" right on their legal immigration documents.

There is noting fair about the system.

The undocumented illegals are rewarded while the legally documented are bankrupted by immigration attorneys and then picked up and deported.


I'm for Transitioning to the Declaration of Independance in 2013

Who's with me?

Elections solve nothing. More of the same Hijacked controlled opposition...waste of time illusion. If he's not controlled opposition he has no chance to win. wake up.


"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

Did you try to become a Republican delegate for Ron Paul?

In 2008? In 2012?

If not please don't lecture us on "voting".

If we had had some real help from those here who "claim" to be Libertarians more of us liberty "Republicans" might have succeeded at the Republican National Convention.

Unfortunately most of the "Libertarians" that I knew never came over to help or if they did they did not show up for the local or state conventions even after being elected or appointed as a delegate from their local areas.

This is why we lost to Romney, and Romney to Obama.

"Pure" Libertarians who will not jump ship to vote Ron Paul (the only "pure" Libertarian) in a primary are full of hot air.

Don't blame us liberty minded Republicans for your failings. At least we tried to effect real change while you promote ex-NEOCONs Bob Barr and Gary Johnson.

And yet we almost succeeded without you.

Now we will support Rand Paul in 2016 with or without you.

It is no wonder to me why Rand feels he has to reach out to the ignorant (not corrupt) among the NEO-CON delegate base of the Republican Party.

It is because the hordes of ignorant NEO-CONs are way more dependable and trustworthy to show up to conventions, caucasus and to vote than the "do-nothing" Libertarian intellectuals who post and vent their hot air regularly here on the Daily Paul.


I will get back to you on Rand...

we don't even know if he is running yet.

Even if he does run, I am predicting right now...sadly and with great despair, that Hillary will win a 47 state landslide in 2016...unless she goes down in the Bengaze embassy scandel.

I would like to see a second party in this country. Maybe call it the "NO MORE LIES" party. Pretty sure that would be a very big tent.

Hillary not interested in running

I'd be shocked if she ran again. She's burned out in that arena, she stated she's more interested in becoming the president of the World Bank. Albeit she didn't get that position, guess we'll find out in 4 years.

The government.... not going to wake up one day and choose liberty. Nothing will change until we put enough liberty candidates in office to change things. Period. Everything else is noise.

I don't know what exactly you mean by "being the change," but if it means doing something which does not ultimately contribute to electing liberty candidates, it is pointless.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

I got a better Idea...

Lets focus on gaining some freedom. Lets focus on being the change. Lets take a break from king making for at least 2 years, who knows maybe rand won't live up to expectations.

I'm not taking a break

I'm workinmg on gaining freedom and liberty by serving as an elected GOP committee member who intends to give Rand what he needs now to run then.. Palin's people are pouring in.. special interests are lookimg for seats, lookimg to get their voices herat, their issues materializing.. so why would anyone take a break?


I know granger, I think you've mentioned that :)

If you'll notice though I didn't say "take a break", I said "take a break from king making". I don't believe a king is going to make us free, I believe an idea called liberty will. These presidential campaigns are great for exposing people to the idea's of liberty, but when they are over we have to switch modes. Stop focusing on the next great leader, and focus on the message.

I'll repeat, don't stop, just stop hero worship.

How about this...?

You are both right.

Everyone should do what they consider best for them.

For some that will be spreading the message of liberty. For others that will be being directly involved in politics. For others it will be both, and others neither.

Do what you feel is best, do what you love, do what feels right, and most importantly have fun.
*Advancing the Ideas of Liberty Daily*

Let's say I'm wrong

Because I'm not doing what I FEEL is best. I would have NEVER joined the GOP if I was doing what I FEEL was best.

I'm trusting Ron Paul to not be a lying sack of crap like his comrads in the GOP and that we can take this party and restore the republic if we show up and get it done.



"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Im all in.

Rand for President. Ron for Chairman of the Federal Reserve for 4 years.

Obummer is a moderate when he runs and a left wing wacko when he governs. Rand will be a bit more moderate as a candidate than Ron, but he will start throwing grenades on his inauguration day. He is one of us.

Denise B's picture

I would love

to see a Rand Paul/Ron Paul ticket and would gladly support it, but I also need to keep stating the obvious....if we do not fix our broken voting system that is overrun with fraud, it doesn't matter what ticket we come up with, they will just stuff the boxes and flip the switches and we will lose. We need to come up with a system to confirm our votes before the next election, and it doesn't even need to confirm everyone's votes, just those of us in the liberty movement. If this system can confirm 500 votes for the liberty candidate in one Ward and then they report only 50, we can catch them red handed, but it has to be done in a way that will stand up in a court of law, and the court of public opinion.

Count Me -OUT-

Rand Paul has done NOTHING to show me that he would actually -IN FACT- turn around the Patriot Act, or get rid of that line in the NDAA Bill, get the drones out of the backyards, and even abolish the TSA ->

He compromised his values to "Play Ball" -> No Thanks.

say what?

He wrote a bill to try to abolish the TSA. He did everything in his power to block the vote to the extension of the patriot act, including using a tactic to delay the vote to force a debate. He voted NO against the NDAA bill, heck his vote is even on this website. Where on earth are you getting your information from, cuz you are WAYYYY off.

Nobody, and I mean nobody went as far as he did to try and stop the Patriot Act. read this source right here: