6 votes

Did TPTB back Romney intentionally for him to lose?

Did the powers that be, Goldman Sachs, the banking esstablishment, defense contractors, everyone else, back and fund Romney either because they knew he would lose, or for him to lose on purpose so they could keep Barack Obama in office? Was every dollar that went to back Romney really going to back Obama?



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Theory...

Romney's forces apparently tried to install software updates for voting machines...

maybe these updates were hacked ahead of time by Obama's forces to actually turn rmoney votes into Obama votes?

Defeat the panda-industrial complex

I am dusk icon. anagram me.

Yes, and to tease Mormons with Joseph Smith's prophesy...

That some how a Mormon would become President and restore the US constitution.

But first you need to nominate a Mormon who actually supports and believes that the US constitution is a good thing.

They exist... but Romney ain't it.

.

.

Obviously, this isn't the first time this thought has been raised. In fact, Romney had been named "The Fall Guy" even before convention in Tampa.

Having said that, I've been thinking about the ridiculous amounts of money crooks like Sheldon Adelson and Karl Rove spent. If the "intentional fall guy" theory is indeed true, why would those people go to such extents to spend money? Adelson was even spending like crazy on Newt when everyone knew he was a dead-weight. Those points are inexplicable to me.

Immoral funding of Military Industrial Complex by Federal Reserve and US taxation system must stop!!!! End illegal/unconstitutional wars! Preserve US currency!
http://facebook.com/NoPropagandaZone
http://twitter.com/the_chiefe71

Mitt Romney

Made his money kissing the asses of the elite while they spread their cheeks open. Mitt got paid, now he's out getting laid from all those "donations". you might not be hearing much from him after this election. I do think he'll be fleeing the country pretty soon with all that cash...ehm worthless paper.

His name is Edward Snowden

What is Capitalism?
http://youtu.be/yNF09pUPypw

Yes Yes Yes! I still believe so.

He was such a unelectable candidate he had to withdraw against John "Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran" McCain!

He was a spoiler for Ron Paul, and the perfect candidate to lose to one of the most disliked presidents going.

I got the feeling they where swinging it to Romney at the end (in the media anyway). Whether that was all for show simply to give the impression of a contest, in order to "GET OUT THE VOTE". Because, from what I witnessed, they where as scared as hell that not enough where going to vote, so they could do thier trickery. Then again perhaps it was attempted and consequently thwarted by Ron Paul supporters and all others unhappy with Mitt that either, didnt bother to vote, or wrote in Ron Paul? Who knows?

This was what I was thinking all along, get the absolute worst candidate nominated, so Obama can win. Seems it played out that way.

This is what I wrote after Mitt's coronation.

http://www.dailypaul.com/252074/why-did-the-establishment-pu...

Bump

I've been wondering the same thing. Here are some of my thoughts:
-Wall St isn't as big or as bad as they think. They have a massive amount of influence and control, but they don't have total control of everything. Gives me a little hope.
-Romney is that bad. It still takes people on the ground participating in the process to win. Romney wasn't able to rally people to help (We had a huge part in this by most of us refusing to fall in line) The people still have power.

I had that thought too. They

I had that thought too. They didn't really want Romney.

They play both sides

Seems they sure fought hard to lose.