52 votes

Any of you that still have questions about 9/11, watch this and tell me what I'm missing.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Once a majority of American people know the truth about 9/11...

... Oklahoma City, as well as other programs that would shock most people to the core, then and only then can we achieve justice. That's why discussing the murder of 3,000 Americans matters. It may not to you but I won't simply sweep it under the table. Not for political expediency nor "political correctness". If we do then it goes always and disappears from history. There is no statute of limitations on murder and there is a reason for that.

When those who have been blinded by a lifetime of lies and propaganda finally face reality about these crimes and government corruption and teach the next generation to distrust those who call themselves government then we can restore some semblance of a peaceful and free nation. Distrust in government is a key and that's why 9/11 is important. It's was done in broad daylight and the mountain of evidence points in one direction... and all roads lead towards the U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies and the military industrial complex.

It doesn't have to be a bloody revolution, but it will most likely be that if we allow the crimes to go unnoticed and unspoken. Because those who perpetrated 9/11 surely have more in store for us all.

I don't want a bloody course to change this country and have justice rendered, no one does, but I do understand that the Establishment may indeed have this in the game plan for us.

Either way, bloody or peaceful... liberty and justice will be restored.


"The greatest mystery of all is truth." - Me, 2009

Most Truthers don't want debate

You know, maybe I am just lumping you all together unfairly... but I don't see anyone defending any valid points I make... all I see are negative votes. To me, it seems like you just want to bury any counter-argument.

I think the bulk of you just want to jack each-other off

"ahhhh, yeah.... building number seven was imploded man...."

"ooooh... it sure was brother. Its the Truth man."

"Right on. We know the truuuuth... ohhhohohhhhoh. Truth...."

"Judy Wood... ooooohhhh.... she is a real scientist..."

"Ohhhhh, I like her... yeah.... ahhhhhhhh..... Say her name again."

"Juuuudy Wooooooood"


Anyway, that is how I read what you write.

Sounds like tunnel vision

good luck with that

Most Truthers want justice...

... period.


"The greatest mystery of all is truth." - Me, 2009

Hi Bill

I absolutely respect the fact that you want more proof than just some person saying "it was controlled demolition". I don't know for sure one way or the other but I am definitely skeptical of the "official story".

From what I've read, no steel framed building has ever collapsed from fire. The first 3 in history all happened on 9/11. I understand the counter-argument that "they were hit by planes though" except that WTC 7 wasn't hit by a plane. It also didn't have either tower fall on it. And not only did it collapse but it collapsed evenly and at near free-fall speed. The only way to collapse at free-fall speed is to have no resistance underneath. That just doesn't make sense to me. Check out the video below of WTC 5, by the way. It was hit by a falling tower and there was a BLAZING fire yet it didn't collapse.


Also, what are your thoughts about the architects and engineers group? And are you aware of a guy named Robert Bowman? He was a lieutenant colonel in the US air force who was in charge of the "star wars" program under presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Below is the first paragraph from his wiki page. Not sure if you're aware that he is also one of the people who believes (very strongly) that 9/11 was an inside job.


Robert M. Bowman (born 1934) is a former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations, and a former United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. He holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology.

Hey go213mph

Be careful.
If you post this stuff you could "harm Ron Paul's chance of getting elected".

As if 9/11 isn't central to ALL that ills America!

Another good one



Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion? Yes!

WTC 7 Collapse Compilation

WTC 7 Explosion
Explosion heard at 0:11 mark, just before east penthouse collapse.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

nothing, my friend,

you are missing nothing.

Where did the towers go by Dr Judy Wood

is a greater scientific explanation of why the FIST REPORT is unacceptable.............WE WILL NOT FORGET

The demolition expert...

...in this film recently died in a suspicious single car crash:

And Dr. Judy Wood keeps getting more and more attention regarding her "directed energy weapon" theory. Funny how the 911Truth folks go out of their way to try and discredit her instead of debunking her analysis and evidence (btw, she started with that group and when she was going down the "DEW" road, they kicked her off the team--I smell controlled opposition...):

"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." -John Quincy Adams

I just watched 2.5hrs of her.

I just watched 2.5hrs of her. The problem is all of her made up words and she also makes a big deal out of stuff that isn't that big of a deal. She is a little to mystical/magical for me. I'll stick to the MIT physicists; he comes off as way more credible.

Live Free or Die Trying

I'm just going to say this point blank:

Anyone trying to debunk this is one of the terrorists - even if you're just collecting a paycheck to spout your lunatic theories that the layman can't clearly see what happened.

It's inconceivable that anyone could GENUINELY disagree that this was controlled demolition. Anyone attempting to do so is complicit and guilty of misprison of felony and indirectly or directly supporting war crimes.

Actually, this is a very stupid comment

Yes, it's surprising that anyone can argue against all the evidence. To us who have looked at it all it's pretty obvious. But to say that the deniers or skeptics are "terrorists" is asinine. That sounds like Bush's rhetoric (eg 'if you're not with us you're with the terrorists', etc). I think you were a bit too fired up emotionally about the crime of 9/11 when you made this comment so you became irrational. But don't spout nonsense like that. It's detrimental to efforts for getting people to examine the evidence, and it negatively influences others who are emotionally fired up as well (as evidenced by the many people who voted up your comment and were swayed by your silly rhetoric).

Bullies like you don't belong in the Liberty Movement

Bullies like you don't belong in the Liberty Movement. You might try the Democrat party... or the Neo-cons... there might even be a Neo-Nazi party in your area... check them out - with your tactic, you'd fit in.

Here is some point-blank for you. I'm not going to let you or anyone else bully me - or spout bad-science and shit theories to those who's minds are not yet poisoned by your ilk.

Bill you are confused,,,

I'll pray for you

Don't bother

So - I defend myself against an asshole that says I am complicit in bringing the towers down because I counter your wild theories with scientific facts - and you tell me I am confused?

Screw you. Arrogant asshole.



Bill,,, You would not know a scientific fact

If it bit you in the ass.

Timeout for language Billy

You haven't countered anything not even the little voices in your head.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Molten metal and thermate

As far as what caused the molten steel, the best argument against fires alone causing molten steel is the engineers stating there was incendiary explosive residue in the WTC dust including carbon nanotubes, metal spheres, red/grey chips which only a thermite reaction could cause.

The Toronto Hearings on 9/11

In video #3 Jonathan Cole’s live demonstration is worth viewing. At 43:17 min Jonathan Cole discusses The Official Account and Experimental Method (How did the twin towers fall?)
At 52:30 min Cole discusses Molten metal and presence of thermate and explains thermite conversion to thermate; he shows a video of his demo showing a thermitic box cutter refuting the National Geographic ‘experts’ attempt to discredit the thermate molten metal connection. The rest of the video goes into other corroborating evidence including the south tower top section rocket ‘projectile’ producing white smoke trails resulting in red/grey chips as byproducts of explosives.

Anyone who doesn’t believe 9/11 was a false flag operation should watch the “Dead in the Water” documentary which helped open my eyes to false flags. High level credentialed officials (including Dr. Alan Sabrosky, past Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College) have openly stated they don’t believe the official 9/11 commission report. He says the military already knows who did 9/11, and it wasn’t 19 box cutters who were not capable of flying jet aircraft at those high speeds. $2.3 trillion missing at the Pentagon and then the day after Rumsfeld reveals that, the budget section at the Pentagon gets demolished on 9/11 so the money trail is destroyed? Then there’s the insider trading and someone still hasn’t claimed their $2.5 million profit on UAL put options (shorting that airline stock)?, hmmm...

Documentary on the USS Liberty: Dead in the Water

Really The Question Is...

...how many people who are "awake" are really still "asleep"?

And as Mort Sahl apparently once said (I'm quoting Dave Emory who quoted Mort Sahl) "How many lies can you allow yourself to believe before you belong to the lie?"

The reason i think something fishy went on

that day is because of the PETRO-DOLLAR. Everything is tied to the petro-dollar. And you could almost make the case that Bush saved the country by going to war with Iraq. Not because he was saving us from men in caves, but because it kept the petro-dollar paradigm afloat for a few more years. OPEC would have followed suit....I am amazed that the petro-dollar paradigm isn't brought up more on the DP, for it is the sole reason why we are in the middle east.

"I am Troll fighter, number one"



Wars and the petro dollar

You might appreciate this video on wars and the petro dollar.
It was posted on DP.

The Sh*t is About to Hit the Fan, Here's the Proof

And to those who believe 9/11 was an "inside job"

Please consider donating to Russ Baker's (author of the incredible book "Family Of Secrets") website called WhoWhatWhy.com.

WhoWhatWhy.com Donations:

Russ Baker Speech At "Treason In America" Conference:

Family Of Secrets Interview With Dave Emory:

Appears to be quite obvious...

...unless I buy the same popular rose-colored glasses that many Americans seem to like wearing!

Here is what you are missing...

Regardless of the content quality of the video, what you are missing is the fact that people are in absolute denial of the possibility that this was done from the inside. No amount of showing them the obvious is going to change that - that are sad and scared inside.

Really? The Ed Asner video? Hahaha.

This video is full of junk science.

Notice when they ask the foreign demolition 'expert' what he thinks happened (1:25).... they show him A VIDEO, and he says 'that is controlled demolition.' Guys, his 'analysis' is based on watching a clip of the building collapsing. It is bunk.

Then they show side-by-side videos of buildings collapsing - and wow, they look the same! Must be controlled demolition, right? That is not proof guys! But Ed Asner continues, 'OK, so it is a controlled demolition.'

Molten steel? Yes, under the twin towers. You do realize the fires burned under the debris for days (weeks?). This wasn't 'an office fire' as 'Metallurgical Engineer' Kathy McGrade tell's you - this was (how many stories?) of office/building debris burning for an extended period of time...

When 'scientists' and 'engineers' act like this, you know they are full of shit. I know bullshit when I see it... especially from 'scientists and engineers.'

So - they don't prove shit guys. Don't be so frickin' gullible... you'll be posting about polar bears and ice-caps soon.

wolfe's picture


I won't defend most of the truthers. But to say that this video is junk science is incorrect.

In order for a modern built building to simultaneously collapse against all key supports at once to create an implosion requires controlled demolition and so yes, that can be determined by watching a video.

Fires can burn forever and never effect the steal. A specific temp must be met in order to achieve molten metal. That temperature is not achievable by burning chairs.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

What's your answer to how a

What's your answer to how a steel and concrete building, that would've been the tallest building in MOST US CITIES, how did it fall at near free fall speed with a few tiny office fires? And what about those pesky explosions caught on audio and video, and all of those eye witness testimonies? Can you explain all of that brother?

P.S. office fires can't create molten metal...... no matter how long they burn!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown