52 votes

Any of you that still have questions about 9/11, watch this and tell me what I'm missing.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Gravity... Momentum

Once the top of the tower began to fall, what could stop it? Do you know how much momentum it had? People can't believe that it didn't just topple to the side... since that was 'the path of least resistance.' - But, they don't understand momentum. Drop a bowling ball on a house of cards... why doesn't it roll down the side? Because, the least resistance is actually straight down (because of the mass/momentum).

You live in a fantasy world if you think there were just tiny office fires.

Explosions? Popping noises and sparks? Wow - could be lots of things. But, I certainly don't jump to the wild conclusion that it was brought down by George Bush. Maybe he did bring it down - but this is no proof.

Problem is, you guys just can't fathom that it happened. You can't imagine that these buildings were brought down by a couple of jets. We have no point of reference - we don't see skyscrapers hit with jet planes, so, no, we don't know what that does. But, you see a video that shows a building being demoed - and "Hey, that looks the same! Must have been done the same way!" - and that just isn't logical thinking.

Drop a BOWLING BALL?

Drop a Bowling Ball on a HOUSE OF CARDS? So...drop something MUCH MUCH heavier on something that is really light? OF COURSE it will crush it. That is not the correct way to look at it....if you're going to talk about BOWLING BALLS....then what you need to say is....drop a bowling ball on top of FIFTEEN other Bowling Balls. The portion of the building that you claim fell was much smaller and made up of the same parts than the HUGE mass below that is fell into. It's a FAR FAR FAR cry from a bowling ball on top of a house of cards.

baubaublacksheep

Neither analogy is good

... but I stand by the assertion that the path of least resistance for the top of the towers was down - and that is what brought down the rest of each tower.

wolfe's picture

The house of cards analogy is fine...

The inclusion of the bowling ball is false.

If you have a house of cards and remove one of the base support cards (a structural component failure), does it topple or collapse on itself? It topples.

What you and the official report suggest is that coincidence caused every major structural key point failure simultaneously, producing a collapse/implosion.

While anything is possible, the likelihood of such a thing happening is nil. Especially, when you understand that modern buildings are built to prevent that very thing from happening.

Further, if you you were standing on a 10ft cube of styrofoam, and someone held a gun to your head and told you that you would be shot unless you hit ground level in less than 5 seconds, would you start digging through the styrofoam or jump off the side? The path of least resistance is not straight down through a structure, ever. This is obviously a contrived example, just to illustrate the stupidity of saying falling through steal is less resistive than falling through air.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -
http://www.thephilosophyofliberty.com/

" You can't imagine that

" You can't imagine that these buildings were brought down by a couple of jets." The video was about building 7, no jet hit that building. I am definitely not a structural engineer, but I would think The structural steel would resist the load above bearing down on it from gaining the velocity needed to attain free fall speeds. The thing I find most disturbing is why the only structural steel building in history to fall from fires was not examined so engineers could "learn" from their mistakes. This is a real opportunity to examine failures in skyscraper designs to prevent this from happening again. Seems odd that every engineer in the world didn't get the memo on how the fires took the building down.

We can't fathom it cause

We can't fathom it cause "jets" have never before brought down buildings. And no steel skyscrapers ever collapsed (exploded more like it) through their paths of greatest resistance, at virtual free fall speed, till that day. You really don't know what you are talking about.

Did you really expect it to topple?

Can you cite any other building that withstood such force:

23,400 Megajoules for WTC 1 (14 top floors impacting)
48,400 Megajoules for WTC 2 (29 top floors impacting)

Each Megajoule is about equal to the kinetic energy in a 1-ton vehicle traveling 100mph.

As it fell, it accumulated more mass and velocity. No, it did not fall at free-fall speed. Read the below link to learn the physics behind what your mind can not believe.

To fall any way other than straight down is a resistance. You would be resisting gravity/momentum. The more momentum something has, the harder it is to change its direction.

Yes - I am getting this information from elsewhere. But you NEVER see such analysis from a Truther Theory... it never comes in the form of scientific analysis - it is ALWAYS in the form of 'It looked like' or 'Skyscrapers don't fall like that' or 'What about the people that heard...' or 'tiny office fires don't melt steel.'

withstood such force from

withstood such force from what? the jets? What are you talking about here? Or are you talking about the impact from the top floors collapsing on the remaining floors?

Those towers were designed to withstand impact from a 747, which is larger than the two that hit those towers.

Are the negatives...

Are the negatives your way of saying 'lalalalala I can't hear you!!!'?

Excuse me Mr Plant,

Please let us know who you are so we can put you on the criminal complaint. This building wasn't even hit by a plane.

Since you can't possibly dispute building 7 you're trying to change the subject. Incredible that you would show your criminal self on this thread MICHEAL PLEASE GRAB SAID CRIMINAL'S IP.

Bush was a useful idiot. Cheney was definitely in on it. Haliburton's stock went up 3000% thanks to the "war on terror."

Oh... more bully tactics

Threats? Nice.

I use my real name ass-munch... you can look it up with something called 'GOOGLE.' I'm not a pussy like 'RPvGoldman Sachs'!

What is there to dispute about building 7? I thought it was hit by a jet engine... Fires raged for hours... what is to dispute? That it collapsed? You think it was rigged to blow too?

Straw Man alert: Most

Straw Man alert: Most Truthers do not argue that Bush "brought down the towers." He is a simpleton and was easily manipulated by a neocon cabal. Remember how he advocated for a humble foreign policy even as he surrounded himself with neocons? Cheney brought those people in, not Bush.

Dubya Was Very Likely NOT The Dummy He's Portrayed To Be

Come on. If you believe that this story is not what we all think then there's an excellent chance he's probably a LOT smarter than people give him credit for.

What about resistance? And

What about resistance?

And you curiously omit the fact that bldg. 7 wasn't hit by a plane.

Do you and fireant see each other at the commissary much?

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Why do you want to make it personal?

If you want to see the difference between junk science and real analysis.... watch your videos, and then read an analysis: http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf

P.S. FireAnt and I seem to be the only fools that invest any time countering Truther Theory... kinda like arguing with the crazy guy in the back of the bus... not very rewarding or worth the effort.

I take it personal when a

I take it personal when a bunch of government whores destroy what was left of the Republic. Only a fool would use Denier Theory against the truth. You are right on that!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Wow... now that is no way to debate among friends

You are confusing me with your government.

Because I don't buy the false-flag theory doesn't mean I love the government. Absolutely 9/11 is being used to great evil's ends. I think we agree on that.

You don't own the truth.

What makes you think we are

What makes you think we are friends? You don't own the truth either, in fact I doubt you'd know it if it bit you where your brains are, friend!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

The molten metal was under all three building.

How did it get there?? Please tell us with your best scientific explanation. How does something burn at thousands of degree in an oxygen starved environment? You are saying that thousands of engineers and architects have it wrong. Are you a scientist? An architect? A metal worker? What is your expertise in this area?? Please tell!!

I am an analyst

Tell me how millions of Americans elected Obama? Group action doesn't equate intelligence or correctness.

It wasn't an oxygen starved environment. It was a very porous environment... probably continual breezes... ever blow on a fire?

Yes I have and my steel grill

Yes I have and my steel grill has yet to be melted. I even throw gas on my fires and the thin gauge barrel it is in has never melted

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Melting steel takes lots of energy...

Melting steel takes a great deal of energy - which a sustained blaze in an 'oven-like' environment could accomplish.

No, I didn't expect your grill to melt.

I have melted aluminum cans in camp fires many times. Not by putting them on a stick like a marshmallow - but by burying them under hot coals and blowing on the coals.

Hey Joey! Come Here! Uncle Bill is going to melt some pop cans!

It's always so funny when he gets on the ground with his butt up in the air and starts blowing on the bonfire!

Laurelai

.

.

Wow junk science at its best!!!

Congrats, your fire reached the necessary temperature to melt paper thin aluminum....thats the best you have?... I mean really?

No matter how much insulation is involved a fire does not just get hotter and hotter. It can only reach the max temperature of what it is burning!

And Building 7 WAS IN FREE-FALL not near, not ALMOST; it was IN FREE-FALL!! This is a physical impossibility unless ALL structural resistance is simultaneously removed; and the only way such an occurrence happens is in controlled demolition!

Talk about junks science, every post you've made is rife with physics defying garbage, spewed by those who are either complicit in these events, or simply can't handle the truth.

The people of Germany didn't KNOW Hitler burned the Reichstag as a false-flag to blame on Russia; in fact, if I recall, I don't think we knew until some twenty-ish years later from documents uncovered. They probably would have thought you a "conspiracy-nut" if you suggested such a thing......too bad they WERE WRONG!

False-Flags are a technique as old as time; used more often then we will ever want to know. DEAL WITH IT. IT'S REALITY

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison

Keep talking, the whole world

Keep talking, the whole world is LAUGHING at you!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

to be honest. Whole world is

to be honest. Whole world is not laughing at him, i believe a lot more of the world is laughing at "believers". But does that really matter, who the world laughs at? Have you noticed how retarded this thread is? People started attacking person for having a different belief than them before he even posted here, Bill says something painfully obvious and true and your defense is this?

VG Video

More and more videos with top people speaking out are coming out. The truth about 911 must break free to set this country and the affected families free from the cover up. Bush and Cheney be righfully damned and the Israelis involved as well.

This is another good video with engineers and others going into more detail about the explosives used. Very well done.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tTMMNTisBM&feature=youtu.be

People who ignore the

People who ignore the involvement of Mossad are in denial or ignorant of the evidence. The evidence is there if you are open to it. Watch Ryan Dawson's War By Deception. But you must be willing to admit that some Zionists are bad. And not assume that evidence against Israel is "anti Semitic."

People who ignore the

People who ignore the involvement of Mossad are in denial or ignorant. The evidence is there if you are open to it. Watch Ryan Dawson's War By Deception. But you must be willing to admit that some Zionists are bad. And not assume that evidence against Israel is "anti Semitic."