All in? Or the slow approach?
Every time the MSN portrays a candidate as placing everything on a first place finish in any “said” state, and it happens; the good folks at MSN say it revives there candidacy. We watched it happen with the Huckster in Iowa, then McCain in New Hampshire, and now Mitt in Michigan. We are already being set up for a Rudy win in Florida, and Fred winning South Carolina. My question is; should the Paul campaign deliver an incredible amount to any particular state to guarantee a good finish? The other campaigns are broke, but, they continue the defy the odds some how. Although at the beginning of the campaigning cycle we had been told money equaled votes; of course, until Dr. Paul got more money than anyone else in the GOP. Something just does not add up here when looking at all these different projections objectively. Does anyone else have any comments or ideas about going close to all in in one state? Or, do we continue to deliver the message slow and progressively?
