5 votes

If A Judge Is Corrupt, Can You File A Lien Against His Bond On File In Order To Force Him To Do His JOB, Lawfully?

Say that a judge wants to play "god" in the courtroom, and totally ignore the rule of law. Can you or I file a lien upon his bond in order to force him into complying with the law ? (ie the issue he is neglecting in his court)

or...

Must there be a legal cause of action ,or a judgment given against him in order to file that lien upon his bond?

THIS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO --WELL, EVERYONE---!!!

If indeed a person can file a lien against a judge for his total ignoring of say a law, or his railroading of a case that is against the color of the law, etc. Then indeed we the people have a way to fight back against many or all of these corrupt judges!

If I do understand this correctly, (the lien process against a bond) The judge, policeman etc cannot work in their job if they cant get bonded. (a bond is like an personal insurance policy upon a public servant)Thus they may immediately start acting more appropriately if they knew their bond was under attack. (as in reversing their decision in a case etc)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Get a copy of his bond...

and file a claim with the bond underwriter.

Underwriters are basically insurance companies. They insure the public against public official negligence. It's a risk management business. Investors will not invest in companies which protect public officials who are at increased risk of being sued for rights violations.

ok GREAT!! so.... Where is that located?

IN the county courthouse? Or?? And do you fill out a form? or file a written complaint, showing proof of the transgression? (maybe a blank lien from online and just fill it out?)

Also... is there any danger or risk to do this?? (that your aware of)

Judges swear an oath to uphold the Constitution.

If your rights have been violated, the the judge must listen or violate his oath of office. That is treason.

The case must be made on rights violated.

The right to speak and assemble peacefully, the right to travel, to be free of cruel and unusual punishment and so on.

Free includes debt-free!

deacon's picture

sheriffs have the authority

to remove a judge from the bench for violating
anyones right,but good luck getting them to do their jobs
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

If you find one in Anerica let me know.

I don't know the last time a sheriff actually forced a judge to do his job.

meekandmild's picture

title 42 United States code §1983

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983

so....

is that a yes or no?

When you file a lien against a public servant the lien holder/ins company does an investigation, thus they must see proof as to the validity of the lien. If that proof is needed, then perhaps showing them that they violated title 42 USC code 1983 may be some of that proof. (is that it?)

You are asking the wrong question.

It is he who has the gun and is willing to use it to enforce their arbitrary rules that wins.

It's not a matter of "can", it's a matter of "can you survive it if you do".

I have taken that into account. and I realize that if a corrupt

person or persons is/are legally trapped etc, that it may result in them using deadly force. (ie England used deadly force to attempt to force "us" back into their nation)

I also in anticipation of that would not use this option , unless there was enough protection for the people involved ,etc.

thanks for the warning though.