5 votes

The Petrodollar: Enslaving the Middle East

To many Americans, the last few decades of American Foreign policy may seem curious. The press takes note of human rights violations in the Middle East, but ignores those in other regions. While Amnesty International has proven the existence of approximately 200,000 North Korean prisoners within the state’s own concentration camps[1], countries like Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran are given heavy scrutiny. This scrutiny is typically followed by military intervention, and as the current narratives run, intervention seems imminent in the Middle East. While this observation alone doesn’t necessarily prove that these military campaigns have unjust causes, a brief look at history will reveal a pattern of occupation and intervention that should lead every American to reconsider one of the most fundamental questions he or she can ask:

“What are we fighting for? Why do we bury our sons and brothers in lonely graves far from home? Our men are dying to preserve a way of life. These courageous, these rights are precious enough to fight for, precious enough to die for. “[2]

Anytime since then when a country tries to remove their oil sales from the dollar, the CIA or military overthrows the government or goes to war. Leading up until the Iraq invasion, Salaam was in the process of removing Iraqi oil from the dollar and selling in Euros. The President and media quickly scared the public into believing he had “weapons of mass destruction.” We all know since then these were lies, intended or unintended. More recently in Libya, when Gadhafi tried to sell his oil in gold, the U.S. supported rebels that overthrew the government. Now, Iran is trying to sell its oil in the Chinese Yuan… and guess who has “weapons of mass destruction” again? The government and media are quickly rallying support for Israel and antagonizing violence with Iran and its ally Syria. Harsh sanctions are being imposed on Iran that have led to thousands of civilian deaths. Malnutrition from lack of food due to similar sanctions in the ‘90’s accounted for the death of 500,000 children in Iran. Is there anything moral about killing 500,000 children, and repeating the same policy?

Everyone is free to believe what they will. You can believe Iran is a threat to national security, that Sadaam was evil and needed to be overthrown, that Ghadaffi was bad guy, etc… That is still perfectly fine, and they may have all been really nasty dudes. That doesn’t change the fact that we only use the negative aspects of these countries as an excuse for war. We ignore genocide in all other corners of the world except the Middle East. We will force these countries to use our crumbling dollar until even the high demand of oil can’t prop it up or our military runs out of money to force its use. So to answer the opening question:

“What are we fighting for? Why do we bury our sons and brothers in lonely graves far from home?”

Well, what do you think? Is it for moral reasons? Are we supporting peace by overthrowing dictators? Are we protecting Israel from another holocaust? Are our men are dying to preserve a way of life?

… or are we paying for irresponsible economic policies by letting our troops die in currency wars? Are we propping up our debt by bombing other countries? Are we really trading blood for oil?

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

quite dated

but still relevant:

"The two weakest arguments for any issue on the House floor are moral and constitutional"
Ron Paul

Awesome Video