-62 votes

AA 757 Hits Pentagon-Video

This copy was released in 2009 following FOIA requests for the original re-recordings used by the 9/11 Commission. It is higher resolution, clearer, and better quality, hence why you can see the airliner.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

no bodies?

What happened to the victims then? They are listed on CNN 911 memorial. Could they simply have made them up? No commercial plane crash and a bunch of bodies doesn't add up.

Good job, Buggo!

You have touched on yet another $10,000 question: If there wasn't a plane that crashed in PA or the Pentagon, what happened to the REAL people who were on those flights? The thing is, those flights were an every-day thing...Boston to LA, everyday...and they were full,everyday! But not on that day; due to a "computer glitch", the planes were at around 30% capacity! Also, I recall reading an article years ago about an airline pilot who makes a hobby of writing down tail numbers of planes at gates around him...I guess he tracks them to see how often he sees the same ones or something...I dunno...ANYWAY...3 or 4 years after 9/11 he wrote down a tail number in Cleveland or something that was the same plane that crashed into tower 2. Given the way planes receive their numbers, it's just not possible that he saw what he saw! SOOOOO...if the planes that crashed into the towers were NOT domestic airliners, and given the evidence that no plane crashed in Shanksville or the Pentagon, WHERE are the people who were on those flights? Were they quietly re-routed to an airbase in Maine and gassed in a hanger? I certainly don't have the answers, but I know we're being lied to.

Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." - Patrick Henry

No grieving families and friends showed up at the airport

The passengers can't just have been unloaded in a hangar in Maine. Someone would at least have missed them.

According to CNN 12:17pm, only two grieving family members and friends had showed up at the airport. 3 of the 4 flights were bound for Los Angeles. From 1:33 here: http://archive.org/details/cnn200109111216-1258

Why not just make up the flight and have the crash REPORTED on live news? Same goes for the passengers - just make up something and fake it. That is even legal - fake news is protected free speech.

Have in mind that this victim part of the story is part of the basis for the War on Terror, etc, so expect fierce resistance from the 911 operation management and their agents on the street if you express doubt or dispute this part of the story.

I have read...

I have read that there were many other videos made showing whatever it was that hit the Pentagon. Why haven't they been released for us to see?

fireant's picture

But what you have read is not substantiated.

It just may be a fact that this one is all there is. Read about The Maguire Declaration. It's fully sourced: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/FBI_hides_84_Pentagon_videos

Undo what Wilson did


They are lying to you - they don't have anything. Or they haven't faked it yet.

My best guess mbennett is that

the same people that took such excellent videos of the planes hitting the twin towers (Mosad Agents) have crystal clear video of what hit the pentagon. Those videos are likely being used to blackmail our Government and is why we are Israels bitch. Bibi keeps demanding billions and turning Gaza into a killing field without the US saying a damn thing.

No other country on this planet could get away with all the crimes that Israel gets away with without our trigger happy, war mongering, indiscriminant drone killing, always looking to bomb someone MIC being ALL OVER them. The pictures and videos of the JDAM or Global Hawk UAV, or "whatever" it was that was flown into the pentagon and exploded are world changing pics and videos. I'd love to see them but they are probably only shown at parties when the criminals that run this country and the international criminal gangs that control the Gold, Oil, and Drugs (GOD) get together and laugh at the brainwashed American tax livestock they have created to pillage.

If Fireant isn't a CIA troll, I sure hope he knows that he is probably on the cover of the Global Elite Newsletter for being the most gulible tax slave of the year. They must have tears in their eyes from laughing so hard watching as fireant attacks his fellow man and the truth while the real culprits just sit back and take another sip of wine. Regardless of 9/11 fireant, you are on the wrong side of history. The war in Iraq was a lie. Why would you even begin to try and support the liars? I guess you also believe that bin laden was buried at sea too because we didn't want to upset Muslims.``Never mind that we use drones to kill innocent women and children that are Muslims...THAT shouldn't upset Muslims...its an dishonorable burial that REALLY gets Muslims upset. I hope you have not reproduced and are sterile.

fireant's picture

Why the vitriol go213mph?

And how am I attacking my fellow man?
I am trying to present evidence the conspiracy sites never acknowledge. Isn't it necessary to consider all the evidence in order to find the truth? If you seek truth, why be so afraid of any evidence? Or is it because a "group think" has developed here on DP, and since I don't seem to conform, I am ostracized. I thought this was a Liberty site.

Undo what Wilson did

Choir preaching.

I concur about Uncle Sam being Israel's bottom boy, but I think rather than engage in conjecture, we need to keep asking questions that make people think. Many people like to lean but hate to be taught. To say that another way, when we try to force unproven theories onto folks, most dig in their heels and reject all we say. If we ask questions such as why the other 20+ videos of the object that stuck the Pentagon have not been released or why the flight data recorders and cockpit (okay, flight deck for all you PC folks) voice recorders were not found but a paper passport belonging to one of the "hijackers" survived the conflagration, people will try to find an answer. Most people don't like to be stumped and want to appear knowledgeable. This tactic I believe will lead more people to the truth that the official government conspiracy is incorrect and then perhaps demand a true criminal investigation.

Fireant you are high, mentally ill, or both

THIS is your "Money Shot"? The plane supposedly vaporized after it hit the building...maybe it was starting to vaporize just prior to hitting it.

I have no idea why you are so convinced a plane hit the building. You act like the Government never tells lies. When someone is a chronic liar you don't give them the benefit of the doubt. You certainly wouldn't use a video image like this one as proof that for once the liars are not lying.

You seriously crack me up. lol!

fireant's picture

I'm happy to be a source of your entertainment.

But I have to ask; just because I allow the evidence to speak, how do you manage to extrapolate from that I believe the government never lies? Have you even bothered to study the history of my posts here on DP?

Undo what Wilson did

the most watched and

the most watched and protected building in the world and that is the best we get????

This guy gropes a woman at 3am on the Las Vegas strip and is caught on film...


“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

fireant...the friendly


the friendly resident CIA disinformation operative.

Let me know when you locate the 2.3 trillion dollars that Rumsfeld announced missing on 9/10.

Oh yeah...those working to solve this crime were killed in the Pentagon attacks.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

fireant's picture

Please provide a source for your statement:

"...those working to solve this crime were killed in the Pentagon attacks."
I see it repeated over and over, yet can find no authentication. I believe Naval Operations took the biggest hit.

Undo what Wilson did



Want more details?


“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

fireant's picture


There were a lot of Army budget analysts on the list; no question. Now, can we conclude from that they were working on accounting for some of the unaccounted $2.3T? Probably. Keeping in mind Rumsfeld was not talking about the money being stolen, only that it could not be accounted for, he was revealing the fact the defense dept was hindered with hundreds of different computer systems which did not talk to each other, which made budget reconciliation impossible. The task of reconciliation did not stop with 911, but continues to this day, and the majority of the money has now been accounted for.
Now consider this question. If this Army accounting office was a specific target due to missing trillions, why would Rummy announce it the day prior? Does that make any sense? Why even reveal it? Just eliminate the people who are "hot on the trail", and be done with it.
As an added note, if your source seeks to conclude the Army office was indeed targeted, it would be necessary to analyze budgetary staffing levels throughout the entire Pentagon in order to determine the odds of hitting an accounting office by random.
At present, there is not enough evidence to show any particular dept was targeted, or that it was a random strike for that matter.

Undo what Wilson did





Even if it was a 757...we know that remote control was possible. I don't think the video is groungbreaking. But, even if it did show flight 77 - that doesn't solve the problem of a nearly impossible maneuver of an inexperienced pilot.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

fireant's picture

The 270 degree descending turn is evidence of visual approach.

Such a maneuver would not be planned with remote control. The aircraft arrived at the target at 6000 feet altitude, which may have been a mistake, thus the u-turn descent. The descent also shows difficulty in keeping the nose down, the mark of inexperience.
I agree it leaves open the question of how the pilot was trained on a 757, far different from the cockpit of a 737. Oddly, evidence which followed that trail was blocked by the Bush Administration.
Some of this is taken from a book by Pilot Phil Marshall, The Big Bamboozle.

edit: 757, not 767

Undo what Wilson did


If the target was the other side of the Pentagon, then the u-turn would be necessary. Plus, you are looking at a supposed black-box simulation released by government sources.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

fireant's picture

You can't ignore the fact it reached target way too high.

It approached from the west and initiated the turn prior to reaching the Pentagon, but within visual sight. The impact was on the side of approach, not the other side.
According to airline captain Phillip Marshall, who studied the flight recorder and the radar track, they are in sync.

Undo what Wilson did


I think we are saying the same thing. Either the hijackers missed their target on first approach, or the plan all along was to hit that specific side of the Pentagon. It just seems that if they were good enough pilots to pull off the turn and the level descent at high speeds, they could have done it from the West.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

cjewson88 deletes all comments that disagree with his BS...



This is the best view yet...No way it's a 757

fireant's picture

Just one little problem...

The angle of approach is perpendicular to the building. All evidence shows whatever hit the Pentagon went in at about 110 to 120 degree angle.

Undo what Wilson did

I don't know...

I don't know what I am looking at in that video. It appears to be a video recording of a computer monitor displaying some video. Is the computer monitor video a cyber creation? Who filmed itand from what vantage point? Without knowing the origin of the clip, its value at proving anything is minimal.

What a Crock

of Shit. Men who have flown this aircraft for a living say there is no way humanly possible THEY could have executed such maneuvers as the alleged Muslim pilot accomplished. The guy with NO training who couldn't even get certified to fly a single engine Cessna fixed gear aircraft. Really? That guy?

Not to mention the flight recorder data (wink wink)released by the NTSB via FOIA demand, when analyzed by professionals, doesn't show the path of the airliner on the same heading as the gubment conspiracy theory would have us believe.

Nice Try.... slide back under your rock now. Then you can work on you divisive topic dujour for tomorrow.

www.pilotsfor911truth.com See what the pros say.

A friend of mine..

A friend of mine is a commercial airline pilot who is certified on all Boeing jetliners and several made by Airbus. He told me that there is no way he could have performed that 270 degree descent and he has been flying commercially for over 25 years and flown to most international airports around the world.

So what really happened?

fireant's picture

Phillip Marshall said essential the same, but he was able to

perform the maneuver after several tries in a simulator. He has 20 years airline experience with captain ratings on 727, 737, 747, 757, and 767.

Undo what Wilson did