Judge Set to Rule on Case that Could Reverse Auto Bailout
Submitted by emalvini on Thu, 12/06/2012 - 20:03Judge Set to Rule on Case that Could Reverse Auto Bailout
BY: Bill McMorris
December 6, 2012 3:03 pm
A New York federal judge may rule imminently on a case that could reverse the General Motors (GM) bailout and send the company back into bankruptcy, according to sources close to the case.
At issue is a backroom deal hatched by GM to fulfill the Obama administration’s demand for a quick bankruptcy, draining the automaker of nearly all of its cash on hand and leaving it in worse shape than it was when it collapsed in 2009.
Read more: http://freebeacon.com/bailout-on-the-brink/
»
- Login to post comments





They cannot send GM "back
They cannot send GM "back into bankruptcy" because GM, "the new GM," was never in bankruptcy.
You might think I'm joking, but here are the facts.
There are two GMs, "the new GM" and "the old GM." They are independent separate companies. I believe that the naming of the new GM was done very deceptively with the intention to deceive the public.
The old GM = General Motors Corporation
The new GM = General Motors Company
GM Corporation, the old/original GM, became Motors Liquidation Company and was literally liquidated. Here's a link to the wikipedia article for MOtors Liquidation Company: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motors_Liquidation_Company and a link to their stock price: http://www.google.com/finance?cid=14194 Also, here's a quote from Motors Liquidation Company (the old GM) from back in 2009:
The government never saved or rescued GM. There was no bailout. It was a fleecing. The new GM is literally a new company, unrelated to the old company. Regardless of how similar GM Company looks to the old GM, they are different companies.
The GM that was founded back in 1908 no longer exists. The new GM came into existence in 2009.
From GM Company's investor FAQ at http://www.gm.com/company/investors/FAQs.html :
and a little further down on their FAQ page:
...
Good
Good