3 votes

Think about this Seriously !

Obamacare and the Supreme Court ruling for example one.
Why did the "Conservative" Chief Justice really and surprisingly rule and decide in favor of Obama and the left? The Republican Right at Federal, and State level thought and rightly so, that they had it in the bag based on constitutional grounds when it went before the Supreme Court.
Fast Forward...Example two
Now why is the Republican leadership( Boehner,Boner Bonner) going against his pledge and their commitments to not raise taxes? Why is Boner purging the Liberty and Conservative wings of the party?
Could it be that the Administrative Branch of Government (Obama and crew employing their typical thugish ways) have something personal and damaging on the individual heads of the Judicial Branch Leader "Conservative Chief Justice Roberts" and the Legistrative Branch Republican Speaker "Boner"..
Is it nothing more than dirty politics being played by the most corrupt President ever under the cover provided by the left and it's control of the media , and most institutions of our system?
I wish someone, say an incorruptable investigator from the press would look into this , "my theory". Oh yea, The DeMint story has tickled my smell test meter as well..Hmmmmm

Why else would all these issues play out 180 degrees from their perceived Dead Lock postions? To you trust anything you see from our Government? I don't!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It is Merely a Clown-Circus...

...all three branches of the fed-gov are in lock-step and have been for many years. They are hell-bent on imposing a collectivist-state, leading ultimately to a global-state.

The Soap Box...the Ballot Box...the Jury Box...the Cartridge Box.

1. Free speech and redress of grievances are largely controlled, marginalized and ineffective. Government both suppresses and ignores the will of the people, albeit the 'will of the people' is by and large collectivist also.

2. The vote is controlled and rigged, both by the two party lock (actually one Globalist-Collectivist Party) and by more direct and insidious means.

3. The judicial system is a farce and is largely controlled via 'stare decisis', power-influence, judicial fiat, 'judicial instructions' and other means, none of which comport with the Constitution and very little which secure liberty.

4. Free and rugged-individualists bearing arms is the last and only viable means of staving off totalitarianism and tyranny. So far, the fact that people retain and bear arms in vast numbers has been sufficient to keep the advancement to totalitarianism at a slower pace. It has become patently obvious, however, that the end-game is near upon us. There WILL be draconian restrictions and/or bans/turn-ins put into effect, under terrifying penalty for failure to comply. Fact is, if we accede to this when it comes, we are utterly lost.

Choices must be made real soon, people...and hard scary ones at that.

well thought out Lt496

As you know They are after our 2nd amendment rights in the exact same cunningly slow ploy thru taxation of ammo and now I heard thru EPA restrictions of Lead poisioning from ammo.
Thus the run on gun purchases and ammo sales.
Yes I'm afraid you're right but be careful as we're being watched . "We're" meaning the collective Liberty minded individuals who are purchasing these tools of last defense.
Our numbers are growing as I'm hearing more and more people talking and using the word Revolution. I agree with everything.

But as the topic I started points out . I still see a hostile if not typical blackmailed approach to governance by the examples I cited.

well thought out Lt496

As you know They are after our 2nd amendment rights in the exact same cunningly slow ploy thru taxation of ammo and now I heard thru EPA restrictions of Lead poisioning from ammo.
Thus the run on gun purchases and ammo sales.
Yes I'm afraid you're right but be careful as we're being watched . "We're" meaning the collective Liberty minded individuals who are purchasing these tools of last defense.
Our numbers are growing as I'm hearing more and more people talking and using the word Revolution. I agree with everything.

But as the topic I started points out . I still see a hostile if not typical blackmailed approach to governance by the examples I cited.

It's all for show

They play off each other (the 2 parties)and pretend to be each others opposition until it's time for some action. Then they always come together and stick it to the people. If they didn't pretend to be on opposite ends of some spectrum people might figure out the game.
"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy."

- Carrol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope

Don't we need a radical change?

I was coming from the point of our Government and overthrow or takeover if you would. A soft tyranny, have you, so as to gain control and change to the Socialist ideals. In my mind this is profound and extreme but cunning . The positions this man is taking and the ploy behind the way the changes to our constitution are occurring will lead to radical differences from our founders.