Content on the Daily Paul is the opinion of the original poster, not necessarily of the Daily Paul, its owner, moderators.

What did this negro accomplish? I challenge you negros. GWB had more blacks in his cabinet...

Submitted by Mr. Kotter on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 16:24

His words, not mine. True as they are.

http://youtu.be/F0sk4yGaEk8

Savages

Submitted by Clint on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 21:57. Permalink

That's what liberals are.

Tribalists

Submitted by scaredcanuck on Tue, 12/11/2012 - 23:15. Permalink

"It is

Submitted by CarrotTop on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 15:31. Permalink

what it is".

Not refutable.

Good lecture.

He, and I

Submitted by Betty Liberty on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 15:14. Permalink

could've done without the constant monkey/savage bit, but this man nailed it.

—

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

Clearly this message was directed exclusively to blacks...

Submitted by bloatedtoad on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 14:50. Permalink

by a fellow black. He's using their proprietary language that is not offensive if delivered by a black person. I as a white person could not deliver this to a black without leaving a racist taint.

I live in Utah and many of my Mormon friends were for Romney and it really isn't a lot different than in this dialog above. Mormons for the most part didn't study the issues that Romney represented and voted for him purely because he was "one of their own" (not that is made a great big difference in this election). We really didn't have any great choice in the two major parties anyway since Ron Paul got robbed of the nomination throughout the entire corrupt primary process.

So I guess the message here is that one should study the candidates regardless of what they seem to have in common with you because what appears to be in common can be a big distraction from what actually could be to your detriment when all is said and done.

—

-Bloatedtoad

Ha Ha

Submitted by scaredcanuck on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 21:06. Permalink

None of us would have watched the whole thing if not for the of colour words. btw We would have watched with honky, spic, imperialist, chink, bubba ... ala ya all wooda.

I don't know if I am saying we are all racist... or all knowingly in the same boat (most of us I think) ... or just like to see a fire.

Happy Season of Too Much Stuff to Run Around and Do
bah humbug

Wrong.

Submitted by IN Sculptor for... on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 18:27. Permalink

I'd wager at least 2/3 of the people here are a little more sophisticated and open-minded than that.

(You speak for yourself, brother!)

Peace.

Cant say I liked it. Terms

Submitted by Forever Liberty on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 17:17. Permalink

Cant say I liked it. Terms of an individual > Terms of color

—

Why does Alex Jones insert a "submit to fear" subliminal message in his movies?

I agree,

Submitted by Mr. Kotter on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 17:25. Permalink

but I get the impression he is telling people to stop voting for black.

—

New AWESOME Pro 2A PSA http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7F1nP...

Toward the end-

Submitted by DHall on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 17:15. Permalink

he used the phrase 'professional victim'... I thought his delivery was racist itself, in it's own way, but 'professional victim' isn't exclusive to black people... Nobody's 'responsible' for themselves any more. Whites play that, Jews and Christians play that, our very government plays that (by calling 'society' the victim for everything they end up extorting money over).

Well yes,

Submitted by Mr. Kotter on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 17:27. Permalink

his delivery was racial. I got the impression he was telling people to stop voting for black and that Obama shouldn't own a vote, or group of votes, just for just being black.

—

New AWESOME Pro 2A PSA http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7F1nP...

Understood...

Submitted by DHall on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 18:22. Permalink

In my opinion, our entire political and societal system is/has been FOULED with collectivist thought...dare I say, from the beginning...The Constitution was supposed to be the guide for which all individuals could live freely, and recognize themselves as 'individuals'. At it's inception, the Constitution didn't apply equally to white females- much less to black people...It certainly didn't apply to native Americans, and it didn't much apply (for example) to Oriental immigrants who, among other things, worked in droves to build our railroad system... Then came the 'Goddamned Irish', the 'Goddamned Italians', the 'Goddamned Jews', et al...

Now, it's the Muslims, the Sikhs, the Hindus, ...whatever...It just never stops, but the TRUTH, to me, is that within all that, we're individuals. THAT is the purpose of the Constitution. So many people spend their lives wanting to be, or at least seeing the world like they need to be on this 'team'- or that 'team'. Equally applied, the Constitution should serve to obscure the 'lines' that people, unfortunately, most often choose to draw for themselves. Politicians and media types of every color or religion know how to play people with that...Be it nationalism, religion, race, national, state, local sporting teams...They know turmoil and conflict are better money makers than peace and social cohesion.

I'm not seriously religious or all mental about it, but I believe in God.... He made us 'individuals'. The Constitution, observed, and equally applied, offers the free will God gave us. We weaken ourselves with collectivism.

I know the Constitution had flaws but they knew that and...

Submitted by pawnstorm12 on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 18:30. Permalink

...they allowed for changes called Amendments.

The basic idea was that you had no special rights because you were "born" into them like kings, queens, princes, dukes etc.

All this crap that the English still hold so dear today about "Royal blood" is just that: CRAP.

They STILL think you are BORN with more privelage over there. More RIGHTS too.

They're as f'kd up as they were in 1776 when we broke away from the rats.

—

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

The Constitution

Submitted by DHall on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 20:59. Permalink

didn't have any flaws...people have flaws. Political, religious, racial biases that just make everything a cause for division. Politicians and media milk that. They 'know'... Political, racial, and religious differences 'sell'. War 'sells'. Division 'sells'. What's beautiful to their sponsors, is that it drives up the cost and demand of everything too. By and large, our 'windows to the world' media and governments try to make a situation or conflict out of everything.
Conflict keeps the media and governmnets relevant, or they'd try something else.

What I wish is that we would stop talking group-think ideals.

Submitted by pawnstorm12 on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 17:08. Permalink

Forget the ideas of Black - White - Yellow - Purple - Man - Woman - Gay - Straight - Old - Young - Rich - Poor etc...

The SMALLEST MINORITY IN THE WORLD IS THE INDIVIDUAL.

I'll say it again...The SMALLEST MINORITY IN THE WORLD IS THE INDIVIDUAL.

Group think divides us into tribes.

Our founding papers unite us.

Dr. Paul says "Freedom brings us together."

This video divides along ethnic lines. Who cares how many negroes (his word - not mine), Bush had or Obama has in their cabinets?

Let's get back to the idea of respecting each other as equals bas on our individual liberty which can easily be summed up by saying as an individual with God-given rights, I CAN'T STEAL FROM YOU TO GIVE TO ANOTHER - AND YOU CAN'T DO THAT TO ME EITHER.

That would end all food stamps, foreign aid, earned-income-tax-credits, welfare, foreign occupations, bailouts, crony-capitalism, flawed bankruptcy laws etc etc etc.

In fact it would end even the federal income tax itself.

THAT'S what liberty would look like.

—

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

correct

Submitted by Liberty_First on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 17:27. Permalink

otherwise, we become silmilar to Marxians who thought all groups have "group interests" (like workers, capitalists, blacks, jews, mexicans, hispanics, catholics, etc.) that is more important that their individual interest.

I agree entirely

Submitted by Mr. Kotter on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 17:30. Permalink

What I wonder is how does the message of liberty get traction with folks that have already grouped up? By someone that is viewed, by race for now, as part of their group?

Finally, even we are a 'group' of liberty minded people.

Judge N. 2016!

—

New AWESOME Pro 2A PSA http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7F1nP...