18 votes

I'm In a Job That Contradicts Libertarianism

It's called Social Work. I was working in Social Work before I saw the light and then Dr. Ron Paul came to my campus. Hard not to change after that! However, I am stuck between a rock and a hard place with this scenario. Anyone else in a career that contradicts liberty?

UPDATE******

THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO RESPONDED! GREAT RESPONSES!




Like this article? Get DP delivered to your inbox daily. Subscribe here:

E-mail address:  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Never heard of Casey Anthony

but nothing that happens in a courtroom can be expected to be more rational or just than the individual people involved: the judge, lawyers and jurors. "Justice" can only be rendered by individual people, 'cause that's the only kind God made. (Or vice versus, for atheists like me.)

"A jury without a judge is a lynch mob." Sounds like something you heard in law school -- written by a judge who took himself too seriously. In that case where I was a potential juror, it looked to me like the judge was leading the lynch mob. And that's usually how it goes, hm? When the "laws" themselves are unjust, judges are perpetrators of injustice, legal lynchers.

Recommended reading: The Most Dangerous Superstition, http://www.amazon.com/Most-Dangerous-Superstition-Larken-Ros...

Are you not an American?

How have you not heard of Casey Anthony? Trust me, its a lot more complicated than you're making it. And I'm generally pro-jury.

Ventura 2012

Casey who?

Nope, never heard of him. Truth. I don't watch TV. If he's not big news on the Daily Paul, he's not worth knowing about.

"Complicated" . . . is that better or worse than I think it is?

Recommended reading: The Most Dangerous Superstition, http://www.amazon.com/Most-Dangerous-Superstition-Larken-Ros...

Just different. Juries are

Just different. Juries are not as just as you think but Judges probably a bit better. Mainly to due with the rules of evidence in keeping the jury from making unsound and biased conclusions, usually in favor of the government. The real corruption in the system comes from prosecutors and mandatory minimum sentences that give the Government unequal power far and beyond what they had already.

Ventura 2012