26 votes

Absolute Must Viewing: Little Heard Version of WW2-The German Side of the Causes of the War

Most have heard: "There are two sides to every story and then there is the truth."

Also, most have heard, "History is written by the Victors."

Most have not heard the German side of the causes of World War 2.

In the US, as in essentially all countries and in all times, the citizens are presented w/ one version of critical events; the version that the people that control the State want the people to hear.

This documentary presents a version of the events leading to WW2, the causes of that war, from the German Perspective.

This version is the one that the US/western PTB did not want the citizens of those lands to hear:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g0XyosEza8

Is this version the full truth? Likely not. However, the best way to determine the full truth of a matter is to allow all the interested parties to tell their story, their side.

In theory, our legal system is designed to do just that; allow all their "Day in Court". It is debatable that our current legal system reaches that standard to anything close to an acceptable degree.

What is not debatable is whether our current system(mass media, education system) of relaying critical information on critical events reaches the "Day in Court" standard. It does not by a huge margin; we are steered to a predetermined conclusion. The "Day in Court" standard is the only means by which the citizens of a supposedly free country would be properly supplied with the basic information necessary to effectively and properly reflect a correct "Will of the People" back to our Representative Government. Our Rulers will not allow that lest we reach a conclusion different from their desires.

Please watch and comment on this documentary. Thanks.

UPDATE: It is troubling/disturbing to read many comments to this post along the lines of-I don't need to watch/I already know followed by a detailed comment of what they already know/believe and a statement that the submitted documentary was not viewed or not viewed in totality.

???

Isn't this the mindset we are fighting? The mindset that "My worldview is written in stone-there is no information that could cause me to reassess/reconsider my worldview-SOoooo don't bother/I won't even examine any new info?!

This post is NOT HITLER GOOD!!

This post is simply a doc I came across purporting to give the German side of the WWII story as told by Germans.

It is NOTHING more, Nothing less. I have no opinion on it's value other than it is worth the time to view. Disagree-No problem but if you do disagree without viewing the doc-seems to me an expression of emotion rather than logic.

I repost the following comment from below because examining very important events like WWII is not a waste of ones time, at least in the view of the authors of the cited references:

"Pat Buchanan's book Hiltler, Churchhill and
Submitted by freedom express on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 20:29. Permalink

The Unnecessary War. backs up most of what the video states. Here, is one of his columns with links to several others which outline what is in his book 'Looking Back at the Good War' http://buchanan.org/blog/looking-back-at-the-good-war-4857

Have you ever read Benjamin Freedman's speech? Freedman was a former Zionist Jew converted to Christianity, that was a close aid to Benard Baruch, the major orchestrator of WWI and WWII? Read and learn http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm"



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

reposting a comment from below:

Pat Buchanan's book Hiltler, Churchhill and
Submitted by freedom express on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 20:29. Permalink

The Unnecessary War. backs up most of what the video states. Here, is one of his columns with links to several others which outline what is in his book 'Looking Back at the Good War' http://buchanan.org/blog/looking-back-at-the-good-war-4857

Have you ever read Benjamin Freedman's speech? Freedman was a former Zionist Jew converted to Christianity, that was a close aid to Benard Baruch, the major orchestrator of WWI and WWII? Read and learn http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

"You are a den of vipers and thieves."

I mean to rout you out!

-Just because you are among us, does not make you with us

-The door is wide open, anything can slither in

heh. I recognized Manuel

heh.
I recognized Manuel Barroso in the first 2 minutes of the movie.
Euro Union trash

Southern Agrarian

Hitler was against Democracy and Capitalism.

he blamed the great depression on both.
he invented national socialism and his own money.
that narrative makes sense to me. and it could explain how he rose to power.
and, if he did not invent national socialism...who did?

DOWN-VOTE this trash. I'll explain why...

(After you read this, watch the first 12 minutes of the film and tell me I'm wrong.)

I am part german, part french, and part Irish. I have nothing against germany or germans.

But this "friendly look at Hitler", was narrated by a German. That's not an indictment, but that DOES mean, that this isn't necessarily a documentary we should just swallow as we see it. My first red flag went up in the first 3 minutes with the first point of the movie:

Germany after WW1 was in a tough spot economically. Hitler brought socialism - and watch the propaganda film to prove how happy and gay the people were with hitler! see them dance in the parks? PLEASE - You know what those old propaganda films said? THEY SAID THE SAME THING THIS DOCUMENTARY IS SAYING: germany was GREAT under hitler's socialism. STRIKE 1.

Then the movie moves onto its next topic: The justification for Hitler REKINDLING the German War Machine. They say: "Well, france made a "mutual assistance pact" with the soviets, which according to this movie was "clearly directed at germany." (no evidence offered or details of the pact) But this movie asserts that THAT PACT nullified the "No Military Force" parts of the Versailles Treaty - so Hitler was RIGHT to move troops into the Rhineland. STRIKE 2.

This movie doesn't prove hitler's motives, no evidence is EVER presented that proves "this is the way hitler was thinking." This movie is just an ASSERTION as to what he was thinking....and in many parts of the first 12 minutes this movie uses phrases like: "Hitler was proven right." or "Hitler was RIGHT in his move to...." see, those are ASSERTIONS, not explanations with evidence.

I turned the movie off when they further tried to drive this justification home, thusly:

"According to treaty of Versailles, EVERYONE was supposed to disarm, not just Germany. So when germany disarmed, and no one else did....Hitler was RIGHT to get that war machine BACK IN ACTION."
STIKE 3, YOU'RE OUT.

Yeah, ok - why don't you go fuck yourself.
You tried to start WW1, don't tell me you need a defensive military 10 years after YOU STARTED WORLD WAR 1.

When you start a world war, you don't deserve weapons for A CENTURY.

Down-Vote this Hitler-Loving, Socialist-Leaning, propaganda piece - constructed and narrated BY A GERMAN attempting to do an american accent.

DECEPTION, from start to finish.

Thank you!

It's folks like you that keep this place from becoming stormfront-lite.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

The Insitute of Historical Review

will put all of this into perceptive for you.
History is very rarely black and white, and now with a bit of time behind us, we can see things much, much clearer.
Whilst not endorsing Hitler or what he did, he is not the Monster that war propaganda painted him. I put him up there with Bomber Harris (who has his own statue because he was a "hero" for fire bombing Hamburg,and murdering tens of thousands of civilians), and all of the other useless twits who sacrifice human life from behind their safety zone.
But I rank Hitler way, WAY below Starlin, Moa Zedong and the Khama Rouge.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p-95_Franz-Willing.html
Enjoy the read.

I didn't even watch it.

Anything even remotely suggesting Hitler was misunderstood is nothing I want to see.

The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
-Thomas Paine

with a tag line like yours

I thought you would be a bit more open than that. (is that "all mankind are my brethren"...but only if I think they are good enough)?

Nah it has nothing

to do with my tagline. It's just not something I'm interested in.

The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
-Thomas Paine

Agree, Agree, and Agree!

Cyril's picture

Thank you for sharing.

Thank you for sharing. Well, I wasn't deceived ... I did get the rather complacent tone.

My opinion on Hitler (and all the likes who went FULL EVIL RETARD) was forged long ago.

Big Control Freaks STATISM, with psychopathic tendencies.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

I am a disabled person with a disabled spouse. I am no fan...

of Hitler and NAZIism,as the disabled and Gypsies were the first to be persecuted under National Socialism. So I feel I can speak as dispassionately as John Toland, a Jew, that Hitler was hardly worse than FDR and Churchill regarding aggression and is NO worse than Obama threatens to be with the NDAA. Truth is truth, no matter the source or the subject.

While this film may be somewhat biased (I honestly do not know), it certainly answers some mysteries to me; those being, WHY did Hitler engage in the "Phoney War," not attacking France for months; WHY did Hitler allow the British Army to escape at Dunkirk; WHY did Albert Speer fly to England during the war and was never released from prison; and WHY did Hitler attack Russia?

How many Brits did Churchill (directly) murder?

How many Americans did FDR (directly) murder?

Come on Bob -- You cannot compare Churchill and FDR to Hitler or argue they are on the same "par" of evil, seriously?

I dislike it when people call Obama a "Nazi" or "Hitler-like" leader -- It cheapens the denouncement if nearly anyone can get on the list.

I would say Obama is as bad as Bush -- I would put him on that level.

The greatest "evil doers" (against civilians) by in-direct means would be American Consumers -- who as unionists of one kind or another (the voting block they allign themselves with) they abdicate their role as leaders (at the POS) in favor of voting and lobbying (perpetual war and bribery respectively).

Ever "leader" has a mass of voting followers.

Abdication and Bribery has never lead to Consumer-Rule (Free-Market Society) by my observation.

How many Americans did FDR (directly) murder? 2403

For starters. Dec 7th 1941.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl.php

CONCLUSION - ROOSEVELT WAS A TRAITOR

The US was warned by, at least, the governments of Britain, Netherlands, Australia, Peru, Korea and the Soviet Union that a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was coming. All important Japanese codes were broken. FDR and Marshall and others knew the attack was coming, allowed it and covered up their knowledge. It's significant that both the the chief of OP-20-G Safford and Friedman of Army SIS, the two people in the world that knew what we decoded, said that FDR knew Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Not that you "had too" but you did NOT answer my question.

Bush did not kill all the Iraqis who've died owing to American Interventionism (the people who died from civilian-on-civilian opportunism and retribution).

Obama did NOT bail out the banksters.

Lincoln did not kill 600,000 people.

Because we NEVER look at how the "consumer" buys into wars, politics, etc or how the individual participates in the destruction of his freedoms we can NEVER get down to how "we" (as individual consumers) can build (for the first time ever) a free-society.

Saying Bush, FDR, Hitler, Obama, or Lincoln can change the world or set us on a "new course" is the epitome of the religious hero-seeking mindset -- the believe that one-man can bring about total destruction or total salvation.

If you are religious; do you agree with Christ when he said to "approach God like a child" -- If so, does a child "chose" whom to trust, is there a "willingness" to participate?

Approach "knowledge" like a child -- full of wonder and not so filled with conclusions and absolutes.

It takes a nation of conscious consumers to implement consumer-sovereignty (Mises basis for a Free-Market) -- which allows entrepreneurs to get proper "cues"

I don't have the heart--

I don't want to know anymore; there is nothing that can be done.

We tried to resurrect liberty in the U.S. Look at me; I didn't even put asterisks around "we"--

:(

If there is a truth 'in between'--

how on earth do *we* find it?

I never have believed that Americans were 'saviors' or heroes in WWII; I am sure the war was wrong-headed, but--

someone set it all up, and it happened, and the death and destruction can't be undone--

There are soldiers suffering now in America (or vets), and many more killing themselves, and there are people suffering in the middle east because American troops HAD to go over there.

Can *we* stop it?

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Hitler & Stalin

The original Turd Sandwich vs. Giant Douche.

Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875 - "The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the People v. The Banks."

Neither one killed as many civilians at one time as.....

Churchill did at Dresden and Truman did at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Thanks for posting.

They both killed a lot more civilians though

But Dresden and Hiroshima were mistakes too.

Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875 - "The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the People v. The Banks."

Both were planned slaughters

not mistakes

Funny how

So many people have an opinion about Hitler but very few have actually read his words.

http://mk.christogenea.org/

Luke 3:38
Isaiah 43:3-5

I didnt watch because an ad was in the way

However, the Germans invented Meth or Speed, a Super Drug for Supermen to be more Super with, the higher they got the prouder they were.

Notice Mein Kampf has nothing in it about gassing anyone

PS please get rid of the ad in the way of viewing this video

FWP and before that some kind of vitamin ad

In Philly PA RichardKanePA

Just watch the damn ad you socialist

If you want to see the content watch the ad!! Where do you get off asking a content provider to work for free, you socialist!!

Ads are "consumable goods" just as our the products they are

selling -- According to Mises a free-society is one where the consumer-rules.

Therefore if someone does not want to consume a "good" because of another "good" that's the market place at work.

He is NOT a socialist.

Don't worry you are in good company; Mises called Rothbard and Friedman both "socialists" for certain views or positions they took.

Mudslinging -- it's a hoot.

It's the implication that ads

It's the implication that ads are somehow immoral or completely unacceptable, and that the person who put the ads up is in the wrong and should be working for free. That is clearly a socialist attitude.

You have to "read into" a persons "implications"

what he actually said was clear "He (as the consumer), does not want ads" -- He didn't say, "I don't want you to make a profit," what he was saying was "he" will not watch/read if there are ads -- that IS consumer-will.

Now if he formed a union of voters to block ads via gov't fiat, then he would be a socialist -- voting and lobbying (now that's socialism friend).

Well, to me it is pretty

Well, to me it is pretty clear that the unwillingness to watch something due to ads, thereby expecting content for free, demonstrates clear socialist tendencies, and that's all there is to it.

Come on -- we can't have such loose definitions of socialism

and nazism -- the Tea Party has made "us" (liberty movement folk) look ridiculous by mouth-breathing the words nazism and socialism and communism regarding EVERYTHING the gov't does.

Thanks Glenn Beck, Hannity, Levin, Savage, Dobbs, and Limbaugh (to name a few). Hell "we've" been guilty of it too; Rockwell, Block, Woods, and Napolitano (though all less-so then the previous list).

A person who is un-willing to watch an ad and demands "free-content" is still a consumer -- that still falls under consumer choice.

What makes a person a socialist is IF he gather's a gang of voters (then votes and lobbies) to get what he wants.

A Socialist is a Circumventor of Consumer-Will.

A Consumer can say "I wont participate unless this is or that is free" -- as long as he does not unionize a voting block over it.

AND THAT is all there is too it.

Was National Socialism invented by Hitler?

does anyone know?
it is sad that all of the things I saw in the video happened....
and today? the people don't even know......

we Humans are so effing stupid