26 votes

Absolute Must Viewing: Little Heard Version of WW2-The German Side of the Causes of the War

Most have heard: "There are two sides to every story and then there is the truth."

Also, most have heard, "History is written by the Victors."

Most have not heard the German side of the causes of World War 2.

In the US, as in essentially all countries and in all times, the citizens are presented w/ one version of critical events; the version that the people that control the State want the people to hear.

This documentary presents a version of the events leading to WW2, the causes of that war, from the German Perspective.

This version is the one that the US/western PTB did not want the citizens of those lands to hear:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g0XyosEza8

Is this version the full truth? Likely not. However, the best way to determine the full truth of a matter is to allow all the interested parties to tell their story, their side.

In theory, our legal system is designed to do just that; allow all their "Day in Court". It is debatable that our current legal system reaches that standard to anything close to an acceptable degree.

What is not debatable is whether our current system(mass media, education system) of relaying critical information on critical events reaches the "Day in Court" standard. It does not by a huge margin; we are steered to a predetermined conclusion. The "Day in Court" standard is the only means by which the citizens of a supposedly free country would be properly supplied with the basic information necessary to effectively and properly reflect a correct "Will of the People" back to our Representative Government. Our Rulers will not allow that lest we reach a conclusion different from their desires.

Please watch and comment on this documentary. Thanks.

UPDATE: It is troubling/disturbing to read many comments to this post along the lines of-I don't need to watch/I already know followed by a detailed comment of what they already know/believe and a statement that the submitted documentary was not viewed or not viewed in totality.

???

Isn't this the mindset we are fighting? The mindset that "My worldview is written in stone-there is no information that could cause me to reassess/reconsider my worldview-SOoooo don't bother/I won't even examine any new info?!

This post is NOT HITLER GOOD!!

This post is simply a doc I came across purporting to give the German side of the WWII story as told by Germans.

It is NOTHING more, Nothing less. I have no opinion on it's value other than it is worth the time to view. Disagree-No problem but if you do disagree without viewing the doc-seems to me an expression of emotion rather than logic.

I repost the following comment from below because examining very important events like WWII is not a waste of ones time, at least in the view of the authors of the cited references:

"Pat Buchanan's book Hiltler, Churchhill and
Submitted by freedom express on Sat, 12/08/2012 - 20:29. Permalink

The Unnecessary War. backs up most of what the video states. Here, is one of his columns with links to several others which outline what is in his book 'Looking Back at the Good War' http://buchanan.org/blog/looking-back-at-the-good-war-4857

Have you ever read Benjamin Freedman's speech? Freedman was a former Zionist Jew converted to Christianity, that was a close aid to Benard Baruch, the major orchestrator of WWI and WWII? Read and learn http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm"




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yep.

Tough to fault your logic.

Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875 - "The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the People v. The Banks."

Explanation Does Not Justify

Sorry, I cannot understand why your comment has been down-voted. Granted, the unfairly punitive terms of the Treaty of Versailles led to World War II, but that is no justification for the Nazi conquest of Europe, not to mention the systematic genocide of ethnic minorities like the Jews. As you so aptly said, Abraham Lincoln was a vile tyrant, but Adolf Hitler makes him look like a little bunny rabbit hopping through the meadow. The U.S. had no business interfering in Europe, but that does not mean that Hitler was entitled to subjugate the entire continent to avenge Germany.

"Yesterday we obeyed kings and bent our necks before emperors, but today we kneel only to truth." - Kahlil Gibran

Read my comment and the research essay I did

You'll get a different picture about Hitler. That not to say he did horrible things, that much is true. The reality is Hitler fought against the same evil we try to fight today, the Illuminati and the English. He did it in an unjustified way is all.

I'll happily debate this with anyone so step up and take your shots

I Like

Your style:)

"Its easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
Mark Twain

Jesus is Lord

Is there some specific reason you go out of your way to offend Christians by using the Lord's name as a swear word?

No King but Jesus, no President but Ron Paul

Jesus is

a false name. Just to be clear and accurate.

If there was EVER an effective curse phrase it was Jesus Christ

Cursing is for "effect" annnnnd when people use JC in cursey-form it gets loads of attention; therefore, it will be used forever.

Besides -- If you used my name as a curse word, I would not be offended, since I know you do not know me -- it would be childish to be offended by name-calling. I think if Jesus IS that he has at least my level of self-control.

I imagine "your version" of Jesus pitching a royal fit in a giant play-pin / since Christians are created in the image of their father.

Jesus said to approach God "child like" not childish.

Sad

The fact that you don't know Jesus is obvious, so your guesses about Him and incorrect speculation about what I believe is irrelevant. It is sad that those who reject Him will spend eternity without Him.

No King but Jesus, no President but Ron Paul

"Spock" -- as in Star Trek?

You "know" Jesus -- not book "know" but personally "know"

You can summon him, contact him -- or is your "relationship" based on feeling?

There are about 11mins worth of "supposed" Jesus commentary in the Bible. From that and emotional transference you feel you know "Jesus?"

Do NOT presume to "know" what another person knows -- only Christ knows (if we are to belief the Biblical account) and Jesus said he does not "know" what his "father" knows.

Dont flatter yourself.

I wouldn't go out of my way to offend anyone. "Hey, afterall, Hitler did some good things" being on the front page of the daily paul offends me a lot more than any swear word could offend anyone.

Neither

Neither of your statements are true.

No King but Jesus, no President but Ron Paul

This documentary deserves Front Page space

for numerous reasons, including the current anniversary timing and to complement the proper front paging of the Pearl Harbor/Adm Kimmel testimony video.

"You are a den of vipers and thieves."

I mean to rout you out!

-Just because you are among us, does not make you with us

-The door is wide open, anything can slither in

Sorry an ad is in the way

than another ad

In Philly PA RichardKanePA

Sorry an ad is in the way

than another ad

In Philly PA RichardKanePA