15 votes

Popular Toothpaste Contains 5,000% Fluoride Linked To Cancer, Lower IQ (Video)

Popular Toothpaste Contains 5,000% Fluoride Linked To Cancer, Lower IQ

Published on Dec 9, 2012

These days it is very hard for me to truly be shocked at a news piece of recent finding. I was shocked, however, when I found out that someone I knew had actually been using a doctor recommended toothpaste that contains a whopping 5,000 PPM fluoride.

That's 5,000 times, or 5,000% higher than the amount of fluoride that has been linked by leading medical professionals to a 25% increased tumor growth rate, the cultivation of cancer cells, and of course IQ reduction.

Just ONE PPM led to those effects. This is ten THOUSAND.

It was Dr. Dean Burk who first broke the negative effects back in 1977, stating about 10,000 had died from fluoride exposure. And this, again, is talking about extremely "low levels" of 1ppm and so on.

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zDip5...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Of course if you tell people

Of course if you tell people that their toothepaste is slowly killing them they think you're loco en la cabeza...

People drink fluoride and ingest fluoridated toothepaste every single day. It's practically a daily ritual routine.

And we wonder why society is so f'd up.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

I Haven't Knowingly Put Any Flouride In My Body For Years!

Doesn't hurt to be sensible. Better to use a good alternative..What is your life worth to you?

How about Act for kids flouride...

http://www.actfluoride.com/act-for-kids/

Is this safe for our kids?

Rand Paul 2016 for Peace

Act label: "If swallowed... call poison control"

The Great Culling" -Trailer ☠ Fluoride ☠ Call poison control! 10/17/2012

☠ Fluoride is deadly poison toxic waste. ☠ 04/20/2011

Does Act ® mention on their label: "Call poison control" on their label? Have their number handy.

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

I've been swishing with ACT since 2007, and it cured my neocon

I've been swishing with ACT every day since 2007, and it cured my neocon-ness. And made me smarter. REALYLLYLYLYLYYL smarreretmtmrtt.

Hey. That's what I get for worshiping those freakin polar bears at the temple of Coca-Cola: F'd up teeth.

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

Good question!

The only "good" thing (well, assuming it was safe) is that it comes with an "EXACT DOSAGE METER." That's a far cry from the flouride in water - with no control whatsoever over dosage amount. Depending on how much water they drink, a 40 lb. 5-year could be getting multiple-times the dosage of a 100-lb 12-year old or 150-lb adult. That alone is reason not to have fluoridated water: there is no way to control the dose.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

The Ultimate cause of death...

A fluoridated solution laden w/ mercury and other eugenic adjuvents placed in a vaccine which consists of a suspension of GMO corn extracted serum.

That's the sure shot...sure to make a body drop : )

http://youtu.be/g8jApdJtZmg?t=48s

So if I feel suicidal

I'll just add a shake of fluoride on my GMO sweet corn instead of salt. I wonder which would kill me first, I think GMO's.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

And "5000" is in the name?

They're touting that level in the toothpaste?

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

1893. Fluoride known as toxic poison over a century ago.

Introduction: During the last half of the Nineteenth Century, ore refineries and chemical plants were introduced in Europe. In these early years of the industrial revolution came serious air pollution problems. Iron and copper refineries or smelters were the worst culprits. Fumes and fallout from their smokestacks caused obvious injury and sickness to people, livestock, crops, and other vegetation in the surrounding communities and countryside.

Unknown in the early years of the industrial revolution, the most deadly chemical killer in this effluent was hydrogen fluoride (HF), now known to be toxic in a concentration of parts per billion. The term fluorine (F: Periodic Table of Elements, #9), rather than fluoride was then commonly used in referring to the air pollutant. Hydrogen fluoride was itself first identified in industrial emissions after the turn of the century, but its effects had been clearly seen in the areas surrounding these industrial polluters.

Early European Chronology

  • 1855. Smelters in Freiburg, Germany first paid damages to neighbors injured by fluorine emissions.
  • 1893. The smelters in Freiburg paid out 880,000 marks in damages for fluorine contamination injuries and 644,000 marks for permanent relief.
  • 1900. The very existence of the smelting industry in Germany and Great Britain is threatened by successful lawsuits for fluorine damage and by burdensome laws and regulations.
  • 1907. A disease of cattle that had been endemic around Freiburg for some 20 years was identified as fluorine poisoning from the smelters.
  • 1912. Fluorine poisoning of cattle was reported near a superphosphate plant in Italy. During the 1890s there had been numerous complaints of damage to vegetation around superphosphate fertilizer plants.
  • 1918. The cattle around a Swiss aluminum plant became poisoned. Aluminum smelters, utilizing the fluxing agents flourite (49% fluorine), and cryolite (54% fluorine), were to become major sources of fluorine air pollution.

http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/fluoridechronology.htm

Dentists would be well to study the history on this subject.

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

Sigh

Wow. Guys, you realize that molecules aren't the same as their constituent elements right?

Like this is basic chemistry.

HF isn't on the periodic table of elements. Fluorine and Hydrogen Fluoride aren't the same thing. The same way Oxygen and Hydrogen Dioxide (water) aren't the same thing.

If they can't get even these basic chemical facts right, then how are we supposed to trust the rest of the document? Fluorine and Hydrogen Fluoride are completely different. I honestly can't even think of a single thing they have in common. Both are nonflammable gases? That's about all I can think of.

One's an oxidizer... one isn't. One reacts with water, one doesn't. One will completely devour glass or concrete, one won't.

Am I missing something here? The author in the document mentions that he may be talking about fluoride, and then goes on to cite a bunch of historical incidents involving Fluorine instead of Fluoride.

Eric Hoffer

Uhhh... maybe its the sodium fluoride in my Act rinse, but....

Uhhh... maybe its the sodium fluoride in my Act rinse, but I am confused. Why are we talking about Fluorine and Hydrogen Fluoride, when its sodium fluoride that's added to toothpaste?

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

Eh

Sodium, Hydrogen, or Calcium Fluoride, my point is that none of them are Fluorine.

Eric Hoffer

Quite, quite, quite, old fellow. Quite agree. Here, here, what?

Quite, quite, quite, old fellow. Quite agree. Here, here, what?

My confusion is rooted in the other's post about the properties of Hydrogen Fluoride, which has absolutely nothing to do with the compound added to drinking water and toothpaste.

Fluorine itself has bizarre qualities if I recall my high school chemistry teacher's remarks on the subject. Made more than a few kids look twice at their toothpaste -- for no reason.

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

Sorry for any confusion. History may be blamed. Or the dead.

1893. Fluoride known as toxic poison over a century ago. Submitted by Mark Twain, 12/10/2012 - The reply that started this confusing discussion thread.
______________________________________________________________________

In these early years of the industrial revolution came serious air pollution problems. Iron and copper refineries or smelters were the worst culprits. Fumes and fallout from their smokestacks caused obvious injury and sickness to people, livestock, crops, and other vegetation in the surrounding communities and countryside.

Unknown in the early years of the industrial revolution, the most deadly chemical killer in this effluent was hydrogen fluoride (HF), now known to be toxic in a concentration of parts per billion. The term fluorine (F: Periodic Table of Elements, #9), rather than fluoride was then commonly used in referring to the air pollutant. Hydrogen fluoride was itself first identified in industrial emissions after the turn of the century, but its effects had been clearly seen in the areas surrounding these industrial polluters.

Early European Chronology

  • 1855. Smelters in Freiburg, Germany first paid damages to neighbors injured by fluorine emissions.
  • 1893. The smelters in Freiburg paid out 880,000 marks in damages for fluorine contamination injuries and 644,000 marks for permanent relief.

...

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

[Sigh] ... Seems the posted article did not argee w/ you. Sorry

The term fluorine (F: Periodic Table of Elements, #9), rather than fluoride was then commonly used in referring to the air pollutant. - citation from the posted historical article
------------------------------------------------------------------
"If they can't get even these basic chemical facts right, then how are we supposed to trust the rest of the document? Fluorine and Hydrogen Fluoride are completely different. I honestly can't even think of a single thing they have in common. Both are nonflammable gases? That's about all I can think of." - Eric Hoffer
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Seems Merriam Webster's dictionary defines things differently as well.
Definition of FLUORIDE (Merriam Webster's Dictionary)
1. a compound of fluorine
2. the monovalent anion of fluorine

First Known Use of FLUORIDE: 1826

flu·o·ride noun (Merriam Webster's Medical Dictionary)
Medical Definition of FLUORIDE
1. a compound of fluorine with a more electropositive element or radical
2. the monovalent anion of fluorine
_____________________________________________________________________

History is oft confusing. I hope we can come to terms with it. Regards,

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

Mother of bleeping bleep of the gd bleep

DID YOU NOT READ THE DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS YOU POSTED?!

Fluorine is an element. Fluoride is a molecule. It refers to any molecule made with the bonded Fluorine element.

Hydrogen Fluoride for instance.

One is F with a subscript 2, one is an H with an F.

F2 =/= HF

This is why you need caution labels on things like breakfast cereal I swear... Yet in the late 1800s, it was discovered as an independent element and the distinction was made. I think 1880s? Go do some basic research instead of accepting whatever bogus garbage is thrown at you from a completely nonsourced website. Anything after 1880 that says Fluorine will be Fluorine, anything that says Fluoride will be some molecule containing the element Fluorine bound with one or more other elements, like Hydrogen or Calcium.

Which is why posting things like this:

Definition of FLUORIDE (Merriam Webster's Dictionary)
1. a compound of fluorine

Makes you a chemistry goat. Don't be a chemistry goat. Please go look at what a compound is. H2O is also a "compound of oxygen" but last I checked, you can't breathe it.

flu·o·ride noun (Merriam Webster's Medical Dictionary)
Medical Definition of FLUORIDE
1. a compound of fluorine with a more electropositive element or radical

Oh, so it needed to fill it's electron shell with some shared electrons from another element and formed a covalent bond? What a surprise! I'm sure THAT doesn't completely change the chemical structure or anything. /Sarcasm

Apologies on the overall tone, but I haven't had coffee yet and you just posted something that blatant proves my point as an attempt to refute me.

Eric Hoffer

You obviously know the difference between elements & compounds.

You are not alone. Hard as it may be to believe, even I know. You state the obvious well. No matter how perfect you present facts, leave it to your audience to interpret as they see fit.

With so many folk knowing the clear & present danger of fluoride, it amazes me how many places rascals put it (pretending to be helpful).

Definition of FLUORIDE (Merriam Webster's Dictionary)
1. a compound of fluorine

    Merriam Webster would be better to state: 1. a compound containing fluorine. Even this simple phrase has its detractors. As for the Medical version, I was alarmed at that one too. As for the term 'fluoride,' Merriam states... "First Known Use of FLUORIDE: 1826"

Suffice to to say many confusing things are stated about fluoride. Many lies are told. Much revenue is made selling these compounds in their toxic poisonous forms. Read the labels.

I am not, nor do I a seek the privilege of... being a goat. I shall live out my life as a man... the lowest form of animal.

    Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass.
    - Mark Twain's Notebook, 1898

Coffee it good first thing in the morning (about 10 am I figure). Regards,

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

Good post

Very informative

thanks

I think that Dentists are intercessors for the public administration so they cannot be very open or are ignorant and irresponsible that is not to say they are good and nice people and intelligent.

ie. They register to be dentists and when you register for something you willingly give up something/contract into something imo.

p.s. when you start a new job or join a college or military or security or teaching etc. they sometimes have their business code of ethics and you are compelled to sign even there are provisions where you may be in contradiction of acceptable practices and 'customs' or traditions outside the domain of the business and acceptable elsewhere in society you signed up to be with.

I strongly emphasize 'customs'. :)

donvino

Ok quick math check...please response with corrections...

In Indianapolis we have 4ppm added to our drinking water.

This means 4 ounces of fluoride exist per 1,000,000 ounces of water

12 ounces of water contains .000012 ounces of fluoride
.000012 ounces of fluoride is .00034 grams (1 oz = 28.34 grams)
.00034 grams is .34 mg (rounded) of fluoride per glass of water

In my toothpaste I have .243% fluoride, it is recommended to use 1 gram per brush. (http://www.colgate.co.in/app/OralHealthMonth/IN/EN/CDC/Steps...)

In 1 gram of toothpaste, there are .00243 grams of fluoride at that %, or 2.43mg fluoride per brush.

I would have to drink around 7.1 glasses of water to equate to just straight up eating my toothpaste out of the bottle. For kids (.25 gram per brush) that would be 1.8 glasses (at 12oz per glass).

Is this correct? Either way, I have hit my tipping point, I bought a RO system today. My kids use fluoride free, as will I from now on...

It is important to know....

the difference between Sodium Flouride and Calcium Flouride. Sodium Flouride is a toxic ingredient listed inbetween Arsenic and Lead of a poison toxic chart. Sodium Flouride is in toothpaste not Calcium Flouride.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"
GANDHI

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."

Why?

The mean lethal dose for Sodium Fluoride is 52 to 200 mg/kg, while the mean lethal dose for Calcium Fluoride is 4,250 mg/kg, quite a difference. I have wondered why this is so, and I am guessing that the bond between sodium and fluorine is much weaker than the bond between calcium and fluorine. When the bond is broken, then the highly reactive fluorine is free to cause havoc by reacting with our cells, essentially "burning" them. Fluorine is even more reactive than oxygen, so that if you introduce fluorine into a container of gasoline, you get an immediate reaction without even introducing a spark as would be necessary to get a reaction when introducing oxygen to a similar container of gasoline.

Perhaps this is why calcium is a known antidote to fluorine poisoning; it readily reacts with fluorine and this binding somewhat prevents fluorine from doing damage to our cells.

But this difference should not be takes as license to safely consume calcium fluoride, since the fluorine is not completely locked up, immune from breakdown, so to speak.

I point out that dental and skeletal fluorosis are horrible results from fluorine reacting with calcium in our bodies. We know what teeth look like in dental fluorosis, so imagine you bones and joints similarly deteriorated. Fluorosis consists of sclerosis (thickening or hardening) of the bones caused by fixation of calcium by fluorine, and calcification of ligaments in our joints. Bones become brittle and deformed and joints become so painful and deteriorated that the only real option left is surgical replacement of the joint with a prosthetic. How many people suffer what they think is osteoarthritis when they really are the victim of fluorine in industrial waste?

I have heard the observation that fibrous tissue is a precursor to cystic tissue, and cystic tissue is a precursor to cancerous tissue. This makes me wonder how many of the diseases that involve sclerotic or cystic tissue have to do with fluorine, or the lack of necessary iodine which fluorine and bromine are known to drive our of our cells.

"Bend over and grab your ankles" should be etched in stone at the entrance to every government building and every government office.

Generally correct.

"I have wondered... and I am guessing that the bond between sodium and fluorine is much weaker than the bond between calcium and fluorine. When the bond is broken, then the highly reactive fluorine is free to cause havoc by reacting with our cells..." - Henry, DailyPaul member

This point is key to allow folks to fit the rest of this puzzling matter to suit themselves. Me restating what you wrote well enough could confuse more that help.
______________________________________________________________________

Much more difficult to understand is why?:

Medical Journal Article. Excerpt of 2 pages.

How did something that is so rare in nature – fluorine – become so common in medicines? A fundamental strategy for medicinal chemists when inventing new drugs is to take a molecule, frequently from nature, and make modifications to its structure to alter its activity. Replacing hydrogen and other functional groups with fluorine can
have a dramatic effect on biological activity.

This explains why fluorine is used in medicine. It completely ignores the Hippocratic Oath: Do no harm. After the medicine is absorbed in our bodies, what becomes of the free fluorine? It latches onto something else... Most anything. The free fluorine element does perhaps more harm than the medicine's benefit.

        Do no harm. - Hippocratic Oath

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

You asked an extremely important question

and then followed it up with a chemistry fallacy. :/

The fallacy first: A carbon-fluoride bond is MUCH different than a flouride salt. The fluoride salt (like NaF) dissociates and essentially "latches onto something else," as you said, usually a calcium cation in the human body (thought it can most definitely in certain percentages interact with organic molecules, too).

But a carbon-fluoride bond is very strong. A fluoro-carbon doesn't dissociate into a fluoride ion, it acts as a unit. When the body encounters a fluoro-carbon, it metabolizes the fluoro-carbon as a whole and not the carbon and fluoride separately, so to speak.

Two examples of fluoro-carbon chemicals are Teflon and Prozac. Teflon does not realize fluoride ions and neither does Prozac. Some people tend to lump water fluoridation with NaF and drugs like Prozac into being the same thing, but they are not.

Now with that said, I don't know why the hell chemists have this obsession with fluoro-carbon chemicals. To me it is has gotten to the point of sheer ridiculousness and arrogance. Fluorine is extremely electronegative and leads to some organic chemicals having interesting properties, but from my perspective in medicine they don't seem to be working any better than not fluoro-carbons. I would even go as far to say they are LESS effective.

The best drugs we have discovered, like imatinib, which has proven to be essentially a "cure" for chronic myelogenous leukemia, do not have any fluoro-carbons in them. Yet a good percentage of new experimental drugs have fluoride functional groups (fluoro-carbon bonds) and none of them seem to work that great and have strong undesirable side-effects.

I seriously don't get it.

My reply to Henry was answering his wonderment question.

Henry has an understanding of elemental chemistry better than I. I felt he could digest the article separating the useful from what is not. I had to sift through pile of pharmaceutical propaganda selling fluoride laced "Alice in Wonderland" medicine... before I linked to this brief medical article(no ads; no politics). I was giving Henry a starting point as to his question, "Why?" He is a bright chap, as it seems you are. Both of you are well on your way to figuring this out.

I do find much of this mystifying.

  • Teflon ® (~75% fluoride; Teflon plumber tape; Gore-Tex ®) sold as non-stick kitchenware, plumber tape, rain gear non-medicine (over the counter w/o prescription).
  • Prozac ® (+90% fluoride) sold as non-stick calming medicine.

Sold to innocents that may never see a toxic land fill... Yet, eat, drink, & wear toxic products it all day long.

As for me, well... let us leave it be said I am a humorist. Thank you for your interest in this matter. And furthering my education.

Regards,

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

Now add the chemtrails mixture of...

aluminum and barium sprayed in the air that advantagely comes down to earth and mixes with the ground water of the sodium flouride for a more deadly combination. Picture yourself drinking an ice tea on a hot day that is tainted with aspartame (nanosweet). (aspartame, sodium flouride, aluminum, barium, and your mercury dental fillings - yummm) Now add a flu vaccine shot. Need I say more.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"
GANDHI

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."

Sodium

Now, why would that matter? Sodium chloride obviously contains Chlorine and is thusly super dangerous, because even ppm Chlorine is bad for you!

And Sulfur Dioxide is obviously good for you because it has oxygen!

Sigh.

Eric Hoffer

The mysteries of the halogen group of elements.

Fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, and astatine are halogens. They have in common only 7 electrons in their outer electron shell, making them very reactive. Fluorine has the lowest electronegativity of all elements which is why it is so dangerously reactive. Astatine is very rare, but the other four have found uses as killers. Among the applications, we use fluorine as rat poison, chlorine and bromine to kill bacteria in water and iodine in hospital rooms to swab skin before surgery.

There is no known body requirement for fluorine or bromine yet we get large doses of fluorine in fluoridated water and toothpaste, and of bromine as a pesticide on fruits and vegetables and as a flame retardant. You are breathing bromine as it evaporates from your electronic components, and probably sleep on it in the flame retardant in your mattress.

But we do need chlorine and iodine, lest we die from deficiencies of these two elements. Chlorine is part of the hydrochloric acid our stomachs make to digest our food, and is part of white blood cells to be released to kill invading pathogens. Iodine is necessary for our bodies to make thyroid hormones which regulate the burn rate in our cells. Every cell in our bodies has receptor sites to attract iodine.

These four elements compete for receptor sites in our cells. Without industrial civilization we would be exposed to very little fluorine and bromine, and if we consumed chlorine and iodine in the proper ration our bodies would function quite well. But introduce fluorine and bromine and iodine gets driven out by the stronger electronegativity of fluorine and bromine which attach at the cell receptor sites that are there for iodine. Additionally, hydrochloric acid it diminished as we produce hydrofluoric acid instead; perhaps this is the common problem of acid reflux.

When we don't have enough iodine, a whole world of problems arise. Our thyroid glands can enlarge in an attempt to produce more hormone (goiter). Babies don't develop properly when deficient in iodine resulting in low intelligence and nervous system problems. When the other cells of our body are running too slow from lack of iodine, then they don't produce sufficient hormones so we open up a host of problems. Of particular interest is apoptosis, the programmed death of cells. When cells are slowed down this process goes array, and cancerous growth of cells results. Cancer cells are our cells that don't stop growing and don't die to be replaced.

The minimum requirement for iodine is set by government at 150 mcg, a very small amount. Yet we could easily get 8 to 10 mg a day of sodium fluoride and who knows how much bromine. Since fluorine and bromine have a higher electronegativity than iodine, they out compete iodine for receptor sites and the water soluble iodine gets flushed out, leaving us deficient. Is it any wonder that thyroid disease is common. Breast cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, thyroid cancer, and prostate cancer plus the precursors to these diseases that involve enlargement, fibrous growth, and cysts are all related to iodine deficiency. When you brain cells are running at a low metabolic rate you are less intelligent which is why sodium fluoride reduces intelligence about 10 points.

We indeed are suffering much from industrial waste.

"Bend over and grab your ankles" should be etched in stone at the entrance to every government building and every government office.

Toxic Poison (toxicity between lead & arsnic)

Fluoride: Toxic Prescription

  • 1970. Over 90% of toothpaste now contains fluoride. This is the result of an intensive advertising campaign backed by a profit oriented dental trade association which is mistakenly perceived as an unbiased authority. This advertising has tended to establish the image of fluoride as ...a beneficial, even essential element, while, in fact, it is officially rated more toxic than either lead or cadmium. Have Americans been brainwashed? You decide.
  • 1971. Germany bans water fluoridation.
  • 1972. The February issue of the ADA's own Journal reports that dental incomes and dental costs per person are higher in fluoridated communities. Dentists don't mention that fluorides embrittle rather than toughen tooth enamel. Resultant cracks and chipping make tooth repair more difficult - and more expensive. Also, fluoride makes enamel porous, thereby increasing the wear rate of the tooth surface. These facts alone warrant ruling out fluoride treatment for teeth.
  • 1972. Sweden bans fluoridation of public water.
  • 1973. The Netherlands constitution bans water fluoridation.

    http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/fluoridechronology.htm

  • Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

    Not saying that flouride is

    Not saying that flouride is not bad for you, but my dad was a dentist, as is my brother-in-law, and they both have the opinion that there are no credible studies regarding flouride having significant negative side effects. Just throwing that out there.