14 votes

Footage of missle hitting Pentagon ?

Has anyone seen this video?

http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/index.php?cmd=news.artic...

Looks like the cat is out of the bag now?
I hope there will be many of you who will keep this bumped for exposure.

Peace




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Rumsfeld

Is the footage of Donald Rumsfeld and his group picking up the little bit of missle debris on the pentagon lawn also fake?

THAT, is criminal what they did!

" In Thee O Lord do I put my trust " ~ Psalm 31:1~

I'm certain some other explosive mechanism...

was used...but it definitely co-existed with a plane flying very low over the Pentagon. Too much evidence exits to even doubt that. There is no plane in this video therefore...

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

Jefferson's picture

Exposing

the Fake Pentagon Missile Video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3tMbY9E5gc

Jefferson's picture

The

issue I have with it is that the video is shot from an aerial platform (helicopter?) I would like to know the source of where this video came from, and what was a camera doing focused on the area of impact at just the right time?
The "AA cruise missile" is a bit hoakie as well.
I have serious doubts that a 757 hit the Pentagram, but I'm also aware that people like to doctor things for whatever reason. It's also unfortunate that the video doesn't show the fireball after alleged impact.
If people can make things like this look real,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrrx9izp0Lc

then they can do something like what was in this video.

I'm not saying the video is fake, I just don't know enough details about it.

Allegory's picture

Good points Mr. Jefferson

Somebody was movin' on up to get that footage.

Real, or memorex?

Movin' on up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L09qnRfZY-k

allegory - ˈalɪg(ə)ri/ - noun - 1. a story, poem, or picture which can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one.

Jefferson's picture

8)

"WEEEZIE!!"

fireant's picture

Original footage here supposedly:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=249310
There are links to it in the thread.

Undo what Wilson did

fireant's picture

Absolute proof...

...that anyone who thinks it's real are unable to use their God given ability to think critically. This is a perfect example of how gullible people are when they arrive at a conclusion before considering all the facts.
The projectile hits the building at a 90 degree angle. The damage to the Pentagon was about 40.
The author attempts to make the viewer believe the "punch out" hole is the alleged airplane entry hole.
I'm sure there are other errors, but it's not worth further study. Fraud.

Undo what Wilson did

Just recently

saw it for the first time.
I honestly think those who still support the official story are either shills or so totally invested in "being normal" they literally cannot see what they see, they only see what they are told to see. I no longer talk about 9-1, I focus on 9-12. There is NO denying that the crime scene was destroyed before the investigation was complete. THAT IS A CRIME. No video to interpret, no discussion of fact. The crime happened, we have hours and hours of footage we can use to identify the criminals. Round 'em up!

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

Not...

Not saying its true or not true, but that cruise missile painted as AA is photoshopped...

Most likely they were

trying to make a point of what really hit and what was told the people.

We KNOW that it was NOT a Boeing!

" In Thee O Lord do I put my trust " ~ Psalm 31:1~