3 votes

Northeast U.S. Mumps Outbreak Involved 97% Vaccinated Children

The New England Journal of Medicine has recently released conclusions to the media of a manufactured mumps outbreak of 2009 which occurred in New York City, two upstate New York counties, and one New Jersey County.

There were a total of 3,502 cases of salivary-gland swelling and other symptoms clinically compatible with mumps of which 1,648 were confirmed with clinical specimens.

The results covered in the video report below indicate that 97% of the cases tested involved students who have been previously vaccinated against the mumps; and even more overwhelming is that 89% had received two doses of the MMR vaccination which is claimed to provided immunity from the mumps.

Read More: http://foodfreedomgroup.com/2012/12/06/northeast-us-mumps-ou...

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Why I would mistrust vaccines.

1) possibly, the most obvious fact about health is that the body must consist of what is ingested and eliminated.

2) Medical doctors are not intensively trained in nutrition. (I had this confimed by a surgeon with royal title for his work in health after raising it with him after I'd read it in works of my famous nutritionists. My question was "I heard that doctors get about 7 -14 days training on nutrition in the course of their formal education, as a general rule". Surgeon: "If they are lucky".)

Joel Wallach has done considerable survery of this and come up with a figure of doctors' life expectancies to be "average population in 1st world countries -20 years.

In my opinion, it is because their business and industry has been hijacked by big pharma.

My conclusion: use doctors for what they DO know because they are the best at it. a) mechanical repairs (b) suppression of symptoms if needed (because of emergency, long term neglect of nutrition, or to keep working to survive, etc.) (c) life support (for similar reasons as in (a)) (d) delivering babies (careful if you are in the US, interventions at last check were about 4 times higher than in Europe).

Do NOT use them to attain and maintain general health, and do the damage repair after the meds that they have used (which most often mimic or block known nutrients -- otherwise the body would not know how to process them as opposed to what it has encountered along its evolutionary line)




yes but these facts can be misleading''because they are bigger percent,,
natural news got busdted for misleading

even though less kids that were unvaccinated got it,,,, they also make up less of the total percentage
however the percentage of unvaccinated that got it was higher

maybe hard to understand how i wrote it,,,, but statistics can be manipulated

and i'm not a fan of vaccines,,,, but i've seen the alternaticve side spew false facts and manipulate it to fit their agenda as well

notice that story didn't mention the unvaccinated,,, 99% of them may have got it,,,, why didn't they include that

The way it reads is (as posted)...

... is that a sample was taken from all who were know to have contracted mumps in that broad area. As long as that sample was random then it covers both those who got and those who did not get vaccines.

It can be that the sample itself is faulty.

However, even if this sample was totally "unrandom" and only included those who got vaccines, it would then still point out that vaccines are only slightly effective because of the high percentages that DID get mumps of those who were vaccinated.