Does DP stand for "The Daily Paranoid"?

.

Sooner or later people will realize that only the ones with money are controlling the media and writing history. A good majority of our 'history' is one big twisted lie.

How can we not be 'paranoid' about everything from mainstream media?

all the while, Bill continues posting at the DP. He hates it so much he just can't pull himself away.

Only the paranoid survive!

You'll probably be more comfortable over at Huffington Post or some other watered down wimpy non doubting the official lies site.

Just maybe, many people that come here believe that the mainstream issues facing the nation are the most pressing, and anything that diverts from those immediate concerns, is perceived as a distraction, or a fringe element, possibily even a radical view..or worse.
Something to be condemned, marginalised and dismissed.

I see these so called 'conspiracy' issues more as 'fishing expeditions'
and it must be noted that just once in awhile, someone lands a big one, that those that would disagree, come to readily embrace as fact.
In the current era it started with 'Watergate' and it's just gotten more extreme ever since. Just maybe, if it wasn't for those that 'question everything', and accept nothing, no matter how insignificant it may appear, we might never be aware of what we now take as being fact..and when you look at it, is it any wonder some people take that stance.

GO AWAY!

Something for you to consider and keep in mind: Our interest in freedom and liberty is our common bond.

Ron Paul often says that "freedom brings people together," and he's right. Freedom brings people together from so many different backgrounds, interests, etc.

Not everyone here is the same. There are going to be plenty of differences of opinion.

The important thing, though, is that we always remember why we are here. That is where we need to continue our focus despite differences in other areas that we might not agree with.

why feed it?.

The kind of posts that complain about a perceived direction of Daily Paul. I say "perceived," because people tend to have a confirmation bias for things toward which they have a strong negative reaction. For example, you are afraid that Daily Paul is being "taken over" by a conspiracy egregore. I don't have that perception at all. For sure, there are always posts like that around, but are they a majority? Not to me.

There is nothing wrong with a healthy bit of scrutiny. The desire to see the evidence for one's self is the right way to approach such things especially when allegations of a stage are considered. Knowing that most of our sources of information are owned by people with a specific agenda in order to arouse hysteria for the removal of more of our rights adds to the need for evidence. There is no sickness in the desire to dispel conjecture for truth; even if the truth is undesirable to behold.

"Truth is an absolute defense against the charge of paranoia."
- Abe Lincoln