7 votes

Ben Swann: The Truth Behind the 2013 NDAA - The Feinstein/Lee Amendment

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I Have Heard This Argument Before...

... but could it mean case by case? The text reads, "unless an act of Congress expressly authorizes such detention". Does this mean case by case or once and for all?

Say they want to detain a U.S. citizen, do they have to get permission from Congress? Why not give them a trial then?

We need to get an early start on 2016: Support Rand PAC 2016

www.randpac2016.com

https://twitter.com/randpac2016

Hard to Imagine

Congress getting its hands dirty dealing with the details, though I’m sure they could do it that way.

I believe it means an act allowing that, much like they do with declaring war.

Though, requiring an act of congress is like the peace prize now, worthless.

When I was a kid, my mother used to say "it would take an act of congress" to indicate that there is no way in h**l I will get what I want.

Looks like I'm going to Disneyland. Yea. ;)

Just open the box and see

But Declarations Of War...

...Are done case by case, correct?

We need to get an early start on 2016: Support Rand PAC 2016

www.randpac2016.com

https://twitter.com/randpac2016

True

But, they don't dictate each battle during the war.
Each arrest would be covered under the act as a whole.

Just my interpretation and what I think Ben's was.

Just open the box and see

Ben Swann NDAA BUMP

Thanks go213mph :-)

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul