7 votes

Sandy Hook Wounded Witness Natalie Hammond and Other Witness: Where Are They?

It has been nearly two months now for witnesses wounded in hand and foot to recover, who were expected to recover quickly and fully. They are the only witnesses who actually may have seen the shooter. Where are they? With a news media hungry for sensation it is inconceivable that interviews have not been sought. Even more strangely, Lt. Paul Vance of the CT State Police in this briefing tells that the names of witnesess "are not released," although this is clearly not true since the names of Sally Cox (the school nurse) and others were released.

See opening of Vance presser here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki8LrQ7O3cI

The Danbury News-Times on December 17th:

Hammond, the recently promoted lead teacher at the school, is one of two wounded survivors of the nightmare that befell Sandy Hook on Friday.

The NewsTimes said:

Hammond was shot in the foot, leg and hand, but managed to crawl to safety behind a door. Lanza then went down the hall to two classrooms, where he killed 20 children and four teachers.

All this on top of the state's attorney now saying there are other "potential suspects," and the continued policy of secrecy with respect to the surveillance video and 911 call tape, and the disturbing pattern of a cover up emerges.

The good questions have almost been buried in the haze of the "staged" and offensive "no one died" memes. Who were the multiple suspects "running down Crestwood (Drive)?" Officer is heard saying "We got THEM...THEY'RE coming at me on Crestwood..." Why were grown men doing prowling around an elementary school while it was in session, then running into the woods? If one was an off-duty SWAT officer, why was he running?

If this was a false flag attack (and this is admittedly a big if) and the perpetrators think it is successfully buried, it is not. Where is Hammond? What is her statement? Who is the other wounded witness and why are they hiding him/her?

The questions are just getting started. The blood of these babies calls out every day. Like Judas Priest said, if they think it's over, they've got another thing coming. (Seriously now, has anyone ever said it as well as Priest or rocked so hard saying it?)




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Two months now, and still no hide nor hair of Hammond and

other wounded witness? WTF people??!!

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Still waiting for Hammond's statement and that of

the other surviving witness. The media is doing a crap job of following story, except to smear people asking questions, whether those questions are good questions or not.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

The compilation, with its sweeping, accusative introduction

is in extremely poor taste.

I know people here disagree with me, I know you have no qualms about alleging that everyone in this video is faking it, but as far as I'm concerned, this is sick.

And let me just ask you, have you ever lost a loved one and felt stuff other than crushing pain in the process of coming to terms with your grief? Ever seize on a light moment, looking for any temporary escape from the pain? To me, some emotional lability is to be expected. I've seen it at every funeral I ever attended.

I know someone who at her grandmothers funeral said

she had to suppress the urge to burst out laughing for some reason. She loved her grandmother very much. Then she broke down crying. Reactions at traumatic times are unpredictable, and we need to ask what these accusations of acting are getting at. That it didn't happen, the whole things was staged?

Either there were dead kids in there or there weren't. Asking questions is legit, but before psychoanalyzing TV interviews we need to get the crime scene photos. You can google that some of the funerals were open casket.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

It is beyond a lack of tears

Maybe they "pulled together" and pulled it together for the camera. But why no swollen eyes? Why no sign that they WERE crying? And who NOT ONE PICTURE of the crime scene? The media is not normally at all bashful about putting blood, guts and gore on screen. This sudden bout of decorum is completely out of character for mainstream news. We don't need to see the bodies, how about a picture of the trajectory of the bullets that hit that teacher's car? How about a picture of the front door, shot out? How about a picture of the weapons, and where they were found? If Adam is the "crazed, lone gunman" than surely it is not too distasteful to see HIS body, in order to prove he was in possession of the weapons that killed the others?

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

Crying and Grief

What the public often forgets is that the people who are berieved think of nothing else 24/7 until they begin to heal, if ever.

Meanwhile, those of us who just heard about it in the news, have mostly gone about our business with only occasional thoughts about a tragedy, and when we're reminded of it, it's still fresh.

It is folly to expect "swollen eyes" from people who are all cried out after intense grief, especially when they are attempting to get through it without falling apart.

I can't comment on the video, as I did not watch it, but crime scene photos aren't always easy to get.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

You aren't getting it...

You aren't getting it... whether or not people have already teared themselves out of tears or whether they are still in shock is completely irrelevant to what we are saying. Trauma and such may result in no crying, but fake crying is fake.

These people are putting off all the physical movements and facial expressions and sounds and sniffles of someone who really is crying and sad but without the actual guts (i.e., tears).

Whether or not they truly had people die, they are in fact faking their emotions for the camera. FACT. Maybe they are over it but feel the need to put on a public show and so they fake like they are crying - I don't know. But, they are faking.

Watch the video

I really do not want to focus on this, there are impersonal aspects that can be investigated without seeming like ghouls. But do watch the videos. It is just everything. This one couple, the woman "gets weepy" with no tears, and the husband sort of leans away. He NEVER so much as puts a hand on her shoulder for support, they never look at each other for strength in this shared grief... I have no way of knowing what these people have been through, but I have never seen anyone behave like this after losing a loved one. One "heroically strong" parent, OK, maybe. Maybe even 2. But the entire town? Is this Stepford?
So, watch the videos for your own sake. Then help me figure out who owned what car, that is a much less touchy endeavor, and probably a more fruitful one.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

Yes, Where is Her Statement? We Demand It!

Ms. Hammond's account as to what happened to her is critical to finding out the circumstances about the killings at Sandy Hook. Anika Sonski, Natalie’s longtime friend said in an interview that she was in contact with Hammond and “ … said she knows only the barest details of what occurred.” See: http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Sandy-Hook-survivor-s... .

The other person wounded is unnamed and we have no information about him (or her) as of yet.

We also have not heard from the custodian who ran down the hallway to warn the staff about the gunfire he heard or the person(s) he witnessed doing the shooting.

We also need to hear from the physician who treated Adam Lanza that states his or her diagnosis and what medication(s) if any, were prescribed as part of Adam’s healthcare. Where is the doc?

There is an account of another individual found in the woods that has not been explained either. Who was he and what was he doing there?

These queries are paramount to understanding the entire event that happened at the Lanza house and at Sandy Hook on Friday, December 14, 2012. The American people deserve to know the truth.

Another car question

This is supposed to be a photo of a slain teacher's car. Look where was it parked. How did it get bullet holes in it, if all the shooting occurred inside?
http://getthetruthout.icyboards.net/showthread.php?tid=3425
But first, can anyone verify that this car with the bullet holes was indeed AT Sandy Hook, and that is where it got the bullet holes?

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

deacon's picture

correction

the rust by the hole
looks new,probably from the moisture on
the car,it is surface rust only,and it
is bright,and if it was old rust,it would be
all around the hole,not just in one spot
sorry for the error
deacon

setting your expectations to high,can cause depressiuon

deacon's picture

looks to me like

it has been there a while
looks like rust in the cracked paint
also their is water droplets,but the rest
of the pics it is sunny and dry,even the parking lot
could be dew,but i noticed no other cars were shown that close up
the hole in the door post is heading out,so the shot came from inside

setting your expectations to high,can cause depressiuon

Good eye

The alternative media is pissing me off more than the MSM at this point. I EXPECT the MSM to lie, that is what they do. But starting with "Fabian4Liberty" and his LIBOR disinfo and his refusal to source it... I have been spending WAY too much time debunking my own sources - websites that I trust and contribute to. I am painfully aware that my OWN credibility is at stake, and I WANT ANSWERS, not sent on wild goose chases by my fellow "truthers."
I say it is time we start HAMMERING the ALTERNATIVE media every time they do not provide a source. I'm going to find the first story I can with that photo, try to find who started this one.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

deacon's picture

all i do is look for

things out of place
things that match,like the training scenarios
happening again and again,oh and again
some things just stand out like a sore thumb
and inconsistent stories,the truth needs told once,a lie gets told
over and over,but the lie is harder to remember,so it changes
remove everything that doesn't make sense and what is left is the truth
take for example the testimony of maksill,he stated Adam
was in the school,when he turned to his teacher,they ran
1)how did he know him? and how did he know it was him if he wearing a mask
2)how did he see him shoot his teacher if they ran when he turned?
these make no sense

setting your expectations to high,can cause depressiuon

none of this makes sense

but the public is eating it up

How many kids got out of Soto's class?

Thanks to pseudonym for pointing out yet ANOTHER inconsistency. Z
Here we have an EYEWITNESS who says FIVE kids ran out:
http://www.inquisitr.com/450873/bryce-maksel-boy-escapes-san...
This is related by his mother:"“He said [of gunman Adam Lanza], ‘He looked at all of us, then he turned around toward our teacher and all five of us ran,’ ” Jen Maksel"
and repeated later in the story:
"But another mom soon told Jen that five kids who escaped were found running down the road"
and yet the first line in the story props up the official story, even though it contradicts the eyewitness account:
"Bryce Maksel was just feet away from gunman Adam Lanza during the shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School, but somehow managed to escape along with five others when Lanza looked away briefly."
And Rosen also comes up with 6:
http://newsone.com/2106580/gene-rosen-sandy-hook-school-shoo...

So, pseudonym, it would be great if YOU could figure out why the numbers in your article do not jive. Asking questions is great, seeking answers is even better.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

The article I posted was rehashing People magazine's article

http://www.people.com/people/package/article/0,,20656736_206...

which has the total count at ten survivors from that class...hmmm. Jen Maksel says she saw five kids from her son's class and then another mother told her there were five more at the police station.

"And Rosen also comes up with 6"

I don't know what Rosen has to do with it...what's your basis for assuming that the kids who came to him, according to his account, are the same ones who escaped from the classroom where Lanza was shooting? Did Rosen name names?

He named "Soto"

Last time I am answering questions for you. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

Thanks for your help

I have been researching, I just never saw him naming names before.

So, obviously these six are different from the five Soto class survivors at the firehouse, and they are not the five who made it to the police station.

Either there were 16 total survivors or some big time lies going on!

Edit: 16 survivors looks feasible:

"In one classroom was Lauren Rousseau, a substitute teacher who was filling in for a teacher out on maternity leave. The gunman shot all 14 students in the classroom, law enforcement officers said.

In another classroom, Victoria Soto, 27, moved her first-grade students away from the door. The gunman burst in and shot her, according to the father of a surviving student. Six students were killed in that classroom."

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/12/us/sandy-hook-timelin...

The article says the boy was from Soto's class

Maybe you are beginning to see why I ask so many questions? I don't care HOW many times I get "punked" I am still going to dig for the truth.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

?

I don't understand your comment. I thought you were trying to get an approximate number of survivors from Soto's class and figure out where they scattered after the massacre.

deacon's picture

a bus driver walked/ran

5-6 kids past the firehouse,sets them down in rosens
driveway
he tells the story of them kids saying how theirteacher was shot
he states"i didn't correct them"
he also says he has to check the list to see of their
names are on there
later says he needs to get a list to see if they are on there
cops took an hour to get there for a 25 min drive at 65
i know this,i do it all the time
Bryce Maksell states "He said [of gunman Adam Lanza], ‘He looked at all of us, then he turned around toward our teacher and all five of us ran,’ ” Jen Maksel said in an interview with People. “He said, ‘We just kept on running. We didn’t know when to stop.’
this statement makes no sense,if adam was indeed wearing a mask,then how did he identify him?
he then says "he watched him shoot his teacher and his friends"
how? if when adam turned they bolted out the door and kept running
and didn't know when to stop?
so far by looking at this,i have counted 5 of the kids had recently moved there, and one helper just started that week,not done yet
http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2012/12/15/news/doc50cce7...
what is the deal with the parents being in entertainment?
and one working with rosen?
deacon

setting your expectations to high,can cause depressiuon

nice work, deacon

I look forward to seeing what you uncover.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

It is not about "looking fake"

It is about getting the facts straight.
Although I must say, their reaction does not look at all like how people I know have reacted to losing loved ones. I never met a mother who lost a child who did not want to hold the child one last time, no matter how badly the body was damaged. My brother in law had a gunshot wound to the head, but my mother in law still insisted on seeing him. So did my husband.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

Where in the video do they say

that they were given the opportunity to hold their child and refused?

Or are you just taking the absence of commentary about wanting to see a body as the presence of disinterest in seeing the body?

Different couple said that in an interview

and the ME declares that no parents saw or identified their child, that he did it all.
It is on the internet, go find answers to your own questions. Bring the answers you find here. Then we ALL work together to get to the TRUTH regardless of what we "believe" right now. That is called "being part of the solution."

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

Can you stop preaching at me?

You pride yourself on asking questions, then alternately say I am asking too many of my own questions and not asking enough questions.

I think your comment about the couple in the video is not very relevant. You don't know whether or not they wanted to see the body. Just because they weren't able to do so doesn't mean they had no desire or made no effort.