46 votes

FEMA Was Running a "Drill" Between 9am and 4pm on December 14th, in Connecticut!

Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection --in conjuction with FEMA -- was running a drill at exactly 9:00 am - 4:00 pm, December 14, 2012, in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

This drill was called, "Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters."

(Special thanks to TommyPaine who came up with the original links!)

http://www.ct.gov/demhs/ical/calendar.asp

http://www.ct.gov/demhs/ical/eventDetail_page.asp?date_ID=CA...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

.

.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

OMG!

OMG!

Thomas Jefferson 1796, 1800, 1804; James Madison 1808, 1812; Ron Paul 1988, 2008, 2012; Rand Paul 2016.

bump for the "anti-conspiracy talk" crowd

Please note the number of up-votes on this thread and compare that to the number of down votes on your thread. Then, please compute that in your head... It equals "The people here prefer those threads to mine" and let it go. Do not read, bump or comment on threads you are not interested in, and if most people agree with you those threads go away. But please stop trying to drive the course of discussion by your personal preference by suppressing what others discuss. Your complaints are absurd as we watch the gun-grab play out in response to a VERY suspicious "official story." We ask questions which may prove to save our liberties while you attempt to label people and lump them in "camp A or camp B." Pretty lame.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

Amazing that this has 43 up

Amazing that this has 43 up votes for a"FEMA Drill" at the same time as the shooting, as if this is to confuse the responders...

When in fact this is nothing but a FEMA CLASS, no simulation resembling the shooting. And it has 43 up votes despite having a direct link to the class description. Pretty lame.

There ARE conspiracies. Post like this one is the sort of thing used to associate "conspiracy" with "nutcase", "whack job" and the such.

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

Debunk, then. Pointing out facts is NOT a "theory."

The word "drill" was probably picked up at an alternative media site, who have been as bad as the MSM on this event. If asked respectfully, I bet the OP would change the word to "class." The point that you seem to gloss right over is that FEMA is always nearby in some capacity, and it is worth finding out IF this caused any confusion with responders. I will even grant you this does not look terribly suspicious to me, but I don't blame others for wanting answers and pointing out possible holes in the official story.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

No, it didn't come from

No, it didn't come from alternative media...well yeah it did. The OP credits tommypaine, of dailypaul, and links to the original comment.

Following is a link to locate Fema. Chances are, there one within 50 miles of ANY location at any time that you enter. So yeah, FEMA is always nearby in some capacity.

http://asd.fema.gov/inter/locator/home.htm

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

Anyone who would bother to

Anyone who would bother to follow the links provided in this post would discover this is a class course, NOT A DRILL.

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

20 minute response time with the police station almost across

the street?

CNN
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/12/us/sandy-hook-timelin...

Next question: How many Newtown cops were participating in FEMA exercise? What exactly did the FEMA drill consist of? Did anyone hearing the calls confuse the drills and real-world, like NORAD did on 9/11?

Norad
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a630vigilantg...

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Good question, map says its 6 min away

with normal driving speed

Total Distance: 2.3 miles Total Time: About 6 minutes
A 12 dickinson drive, sandy hook, ct, 06482
2.3 miles / about 6 minutes

Depart Dickinson Dr toward Riverside Rd0.2 mi
Turn left onto Riverside Rd0.2 mi
Keep straight onto CT-816 / Church Hill Rd0.4 mi
Keep straight onto US-6 / Church Hill Rd1.1 mi
Turn left onto CT-25 / Main St0.3 mi

B Newtown Police Dept
3 Main St, Newtown, CT 06470
(203) 270-4255

http://www.yellowpages.com/newtown-ct/mip/newtown-police-dep...

Maybe someone should call and find out if they were at the FEMA class or just sleeping in late that morning

RP R3VOLution

Is The Daily Paul the only

Is The Daily Paul the only alternative mainstream new media website covering this story?

Has any other new media website reported this news?

Nope. I just did a search...Daily Paul is number 1, and all the other links went to ct.gov or fema.gov.

I guess the Daily Paul is just waaaay ahead of the political curve.

WHY isn't this being reported!!! Especially after how everytime some major event happens it turns out that a government drill was taking place at the exact same time, with the exact same plot!

Perhaps we should send all of our alternative media friends a few e-mails, eh? Maybe they've been on vacation...but we need to kindly let them know it's time to get back to work!

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

I still wanna know

how the police supposedly know that Adam killed his mother.

Remember how about 2 or 3

Remember how about 2 or 3 days after the police said they knew of a possible MOTIVE but did not release any details?

It's been 2 weeks now and we still don't have no motive.

Nancy Lanza was described as being, "overly protective of her son." She was a, "Loving, caring mother who did everything to take care of her son."

NOBODY ever said his mother was abusive, or did not love her own child.

So why would he kill his own mother? EXCELLENT question, vinceableworld!

The one person in his life that was always there for him, took care of him, fed him, housed him and protected Adam...and even (allegedly) taught him how to shoot as any good mother would do if papa flew the coup, but I don't buy that story.

Where's the motive? Where did he get the bullet proof vest from? Why did the police take an hour to respond to a situation located less than 10 minutes away? Who was the first 911 caller? Why haven't we heard the PUBLIC tapes?

There are so many questions, but the FIRST question should be, why did he supposedly kill his mother while she was sleeping?

While she was sleeping....hmmm. MULTIPLE gun shots fired, but the neighbors must have been deaf.

Simple questions with no answers as to WHY or HOW Sandy Hook happened.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

Hmmm

Military jets were sent out over the Atlantic Ocean on 9/11?

*shaking my head*

I am not one who has pieced this together yet.

I don't believe anything, not the official story, not the many possible alternatives--

I just want to know the truth, and that seems impossible to obtain.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Mission accomplished.

and that seems impossible to obtain.

I agree which is likely the

I agree which is likely the intention of those people backing the official nonsensical version of the events. We know for a fact that the official story is scripted BS since we have proof of additional participants in the tragedy, i.e. the WABC video, a kid's testimony. We have disinformation agents on the DP adding to the confusion and those members of the DP doing so are obvious. Over the weekend, I'll be using the obvious discrepancies in the official story in a letter to my non-representatives and restating the obvious: with every attempt to control weapons in violation of the 2nd amendment, the blood of MORE innocent victims will be on their hands just as the case with those members of congress who voted to ban weapons within a school's perimeter. Criminals will always find access to weapons via a black market created by well-intentioned by misguided politicians in the aftermath of another needless tragedy which the politicians created in the first place.

deacon's picture

notice anything missing

between these 2 articles?
http://newtownbee.com/News/2012-12-14__10-59-12/Gunman+Opens...

http://newtownbee.com/News/News/2012/12-December/2012-12-14_...
one paragraph is gone
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

please cut and paste

if copyright is questioned send them my way I'll take care of it.

It was probably the pandas.

OMG!!! You don't suppose it

OMG!!! You don't suppose it might be that they wrote one article, and then after INTERVIEWING PEOPLE they expanded on that article???

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

Rather, redacted

The second article is missing something, nothing has been added or expaned. News changes by adding things, even things changing the original article. Never by taking things away. How can news be trusted when they redact portions?

Just open the box and see

I must have missed the time

I must have missed the time stamp...
I can see from the web address that both articles were published on the 14th, and I'm guessing that the first article, in order of THE ABOVE POST, that it was probably published at 10:59:12, which is AFTER the second article above, which was actually published BEFORE the first one at 10:32:45. Just because Deacon, above, put them in reverse order does not mean they were published in that order.

If they were to redact that paragraph, might it be that they royally screwed up, stating that they had interviewed a dead person?

The publisher has a "search" botton on those pages. If you search "sandy hook elementary" date 12/14/12-12/15/12, you'll get their results page, INCLUDING TIMESTAMPS for associated articles...Deacon states that one paragraph is gone. No, one paragraph was ADDED.

You'll quickly notice that the one with the extra paragraph was published second chronologically. The article where they stated that the "principle said...", but the principle was one of the victims...

http://newtownbee.com/search/default.aspx

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

deacon's picture

the paragraph

with the principal came out first
the 2nd one without her statement came out 2nd
i printed the first out when it came out
they took her testimony out of the 2nd one
then going by the timestamps,the article with
the principals testimony came out second?
what i did was put them in order as i found them
on the internet,i found the article with her testimony first
which was the same day it happened
and i found the article with her statement taken out yesterday
if the 2nd came out first,wouldn't i have seen it first?
and not the other way around
if the timestamps are in the links,then didn't they interview
the DEAD principal?
i have posted this article about that interview here,the same day it happened,with her testimony,it is not like i was up to something
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

They are both from the same

They are both from the same day, within 30 minutes of each other. They "interviewed" the dead witness before the victims names had been released. Of course its easy to get a dead witness to say whatever you want them to say...of course she may have not been dead at the time of the interview. Possibly she stumbled outside to give the interview, then stumbled back inside to die of her gunshot wounds. You'd would think that the reporter would have noticed that she was wounded, near death and in need of medical attention, but these reporters have a lot on their mind trying to get the true story and all, obviously.
The time stamp is in the links, but the Bees archive has a timestamp on all of their articles.

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

The timestamps are meaningless.

"Timestamps in links" <--- this has no basis for any kind of evidence as that can easily be changed by the webmaster.

You're right, it is not any

You're right, it is not any kind of concrete proof. But logically, they have three similar articles. The first one according to their timestamp is very short. The next one according to their timestamp is basically the same as the first with additions, and the 3rd according to their timestamps is basically the second one with yet still more additions. It is logical that as more information, whether contrived or otherwise, becomes available that the articles would follow such a path. It would be illogical that the article would get shorter as more information became available.

Of course considering the publisher claims to have interviewed a dead person, its obvious we're talking about illogical people here, or just simply idiots, which would equate to illogical...

You would think that if they were going to bother to change the timestamps, they'd also take out the interview with the walking dead...

This all makes me wonder how much common sense exist HERE on this site...

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

deacon's picture

from your comment...

"This all makes me wonder how much common sense exist HERE on this site."
why would a paper questioning a dead person,give you pause as to
the amount of common sense here at the DP?
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

It is not the paper

It is not the paper questioning a dead person that gives me pause. It is people looking so intensely that they see things that are not there...looking to the point of ignoring and unable to see the obvious, straining and contorting themselves to the point of being illogical in their quest to find conspriracy, even to the point that the possibility that a conspiracy does not exist is not a possibility. To the point that ANY and EVERY conflict MUST BE a conspiracy. "Their out to get us" is ALWAYS the FIRST and ONLY possibility. The "story" is ALWAYS a lie, therefore NEVER believe ANYTHING. ALWAYS look for "their" screw ups.

And from THIS frame of mind...we get "a paragraph was REMOVED" instead of the obvious, a paragraph was ADDED just as would LOGICALLY be done as more information became available...whether contrived information or otherwise.

But the paranoia results in the OBVIOUS and LOGIC to be ignored, even SHUNNED, because if its obvious, it MUST BE "their" lies. It is what "they" want you to think. Its too easy, its too obvious, its too logical. Therefore it MUST be a lie. Need to look closer for what is missing here... must be something, anything that will lead to the TRUTH...it just CAN'T BE what it obviously is...there MUST BE something else..."they" are coming for us...nowhere to hid now.......................

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

deacon's picture

lol

your answer is too funny,and just a touch disturbing
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

I did too

I didn't see a time stamp on them from the page, and I did think about it. Thanks for alerting me that the search would show the time.
I still say that a redaction of a submitted story should be impossible in the interest of honest news. Retractions or changes should be added to what was said.

This case however, should be of interest to the editor of the paper. Whoever submitted the story, and then amended it, with bad information, should be examined as to whether they really are reporter material. ;)

Just open the box and see

Did the State Police

ask if this was an exercise or test? Did the dispatcher say, "This is not an exercise, not a test?"