4 votes

The next step?

I swear it's like living the Terminator nightmare... aren't the men and women at the controls of the drone war in Pakistan and elsewhere actually drones themselves to TPTB?

Washington'sBlog put up a very sobering post about the Second Amendment... Right to bear... drones?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/12/the-second-amendment-...

He quotes our Founding Fathers, then Orwell, who wrote in 1945:
"The connection between the discovery of gunpowder and the overthrow of feudalism by the bourgeoisie has been pointed out over and over again. And though I have no doubt exceptions can be brought forward, I think the following rule would be found generally true: that ages in which the dominant weapon is expensive or difficult to make will tend to be ages of despotism, whereas when the dominant weapon is cheap and simple, the common people have a chance. Thus, for example, tanks, battleships and bombing planes are inherently tyrannical weapons, while rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon–so long as there is no answer to it–gives claws to the weak.The great age of democracy and of national self-determination was the age of the musket and the rifle. After the invention of the flintlock, and before the invention of the percussion cap, the musket was a fairly efficient weapon, and at the same time so simple that it could be produced almost anywhere. Its combination of qualities made possible the success of the American and French revolutions, and made a popular insurrection a more serious business than it could be in our own day. After the musket came the breech-loading rifle. This was a comparatively complex thing, but it could still be produced in scores of countries, and it was cheap, easily smuggled and economical of ammunition. Even the most backward nation could always get hold of rifles from one source or another, so that Boers, Bulgars, Abyssinians, Moroccans–even Tibetans–could put up a fight for their independence, sometimes with success. But thereafter every development in military technique has favoured the State as against the individual, and the industrialised country as against the backward one …The one thing that might reverse it is the discovery of a weapon–or, to put it more broadly, of a method of fighting–not dependent on huge concentrations of industrial plant."
Washington'sBlog then comments:
If he were alive today, Orwell might say that – unless the American people create and adopt high-tech ways to defend themselves – guns will not be able to compete with drones, robots and other high-tech weapons created by the virtually unlimited American military budget.

This video was posted on the blog
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jplh7uatr-E&feature=player_em...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

One more thing for my prepper list.

Home defense for the poor man.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

Terminator for sure.

I wonder how they would fare against one of those big commercial duty fans blowing against them. Fans at the moment are legal, affordable and can dry your hair while you wait.

How about a test against one of these:

http://c.shld.net/rpx/i/s/pi/mp/4100/1976645801p?src=http%3A...

2014 Liberty Candidate Thread: http://www.dailypaul.com/287246/2014-liberty-candidate-thread

2016 Potential Presidential Candidates: http://alturl.com/mt7tq

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul