4 votes

WHY Does Obama Want to Diminish the American Defense Arsenal and Disarm Americans as Well?

"In Friday’s Wall Street Journal op-ed by John Bolton and John Woo, a State Department advisory group is advising that the U.S. and Russia both reduce nuclear weapons without a treaty, as a treaty would require ratification by Congress.

This would allow Obama and his executive branch to unilaterally cut our nuclear weaponry and ignore the treaty clause of the Constitution. As he promised in March, Obama seeks even deeper reductions through "a step we have never taken before—reducing not only our strategic nuclear warheads, but also tactical weapons and warheads in reserve."

Such cuts threaten both the viability of our strategic deterrent and the Senate's constitutional say over treaties, a critical check on executive power in foreign affairs.

If Obama is allowed to realize the Davis/Palmer/Ayers/Dohrn vision of a militarily impotent America , Americans will be faced with two very harsh choices.

Lay down your arms, and give up your sovereignty, to a United Nations world superstate.

Or face the combined military might of Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, possibly Pakistan, Indonesia, and Brazil, and several other countries…with hardly a friend in the world to come to your aid.

This wont be a one or two front conflict. This will be a multipolar, all out attack on the US homeland.

Americans need to wake up. And fast."

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Why does Obama want AK-47s in Soldiers hands?

When American soldiers use M-16s.

Only 3rd World Armies use AK-47s.

As an American I NEVER want to see AK-47s in the hands of Soldiers. Why would he press that point?

"First rule of Government Spending: Why build one when you can have 2 at twice the price?"
-S.R. Hadden

The Chances Are Still Slim For The Combined MIght Of

"Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, possibly Pakistan, Indonesia, and Brazil, and several other countries…" considering American citizens still have more guns than all of those together.

Also they'll have to dodge all of the American wide awake police, military plus veterans, and militia who might be hunting them down and doing target practice on them if they decide to go along with their orders.

Another thought... I think once the foreign military soldiers realize they're being used as cannon fodder and their chances of survival are slim, they just might come to their senses and realize it's time to go AWOL in a much freer country than their own... This could be feasible for the foreigners if everyone is considering the federal gov't as a lawless entity that needs to be eliminated.

I've thought of many different things that may be attempted, but honestly I believe the only way the corrupt gov't may successfully disarm America is if they trick everyone into giving up the guns. That's how it's been done in other countries, when people willingly turned in their firearms because of some stupid law shoved down the throats of their people. Unfortunately they've pulled this crap around the world too many times and America has noticed the results in each case being higher crime rates and eventually genocide, or democide. I believe for the most part, American people just aren't buying their crap anymore.

Although they are making huge psyop efforts on mainline news to try to convince everyone that gun control is the consensus, I don't believe they are being to successful with that. The reported sales of over 10 Million firearms and 1 Billion rounds of ammunition in the month of December 2012 alone (not counting the rest of the year sales) speaks to that fact. America has more firearms owned than the total population. Obama seems to be the best gun salesman in American history...

Also, as he keeps bragging, Obama supposedly won the election with just 15% of the total country population voting for him (Population 300 Million, 100 Million Votes Cast, Obama receiving slightly more than 50 Million Total Votes, Thats 50 Million divided by 300 Million which is roughly 15%), and most everyone even have serious doubts about that. I think the real number might be closer to 5% and they just added/padded votes.

Anyway, I say let them try to enforce a gun ban. If this country breaks out in a war, all of those politicians who voted away gun rights might be sharp shooter target fair game as well as foreign troops. Let's see them try & likely die due to their actions...

-LibertyG ... 2 Corinthians 2:16-17 "To some we are a scent of death leading to death, but to others, a scent of life leading to life. And who is competent for this? For we are not like the many who make a trade(for profit) but as those with sincerity...

They are smart cookies.

Bring on disarming the people and disarming America defensively as a nation all at the same time, in the same week. They want to cut down on all strategic defense weapons as well as take our guns. NOW I ask again, why weaken America in this manner...who gains...

I used to read articles from

I used to read articles from this site but I've found that most of them are even worse than abovetopsecret.

Obama is commander in chief, he is already in control.

Try Wall Street Journal Op Ed


I was skeptical at first, but it is not just this New Zealand journalist who is giving his opinion.

well the best way to conquer a people

would be to impoverish and isolate them to the point of surrender.

No doubt there are traitors running the government

There are a few traitors in government

who have been trying to dismantle America for a long time, those who are above any nationality, whose allegiance is to an elite group who want money and power, and to rule the planet for their own gain. The American military is stretched out thin all over the planet, with very little defense at home.