2 votes

Tax Burden - Who Will Actually Pay The Tax - Who Will Actually Benefit

SPECIAL REPORTS #5

TAX BURDEN

Understand this.

This is a Lesson.

1.) FAIR = JEALOUSY

2.) It is NOT about WHO pays the tax;

.... But it is WHAT the tax is paid FOR.

To illustrate why any tax that uses fairness i.e. Jealousy to tax the wealthy, simply taxes the POOR harder and keeps them poor;

as well as eventually financially enslaves them.

First you need to recognize your ENEMY, and that enemy is "YOU".

1.) Ignorance
2.) Jealousy

Now to recognize it in yourself, I will make you not only jealous of me, I will make you hate me.

First I will tell you I am rich, filthy rich (I am not, but that is what I'm using to make you recognize jealousy i.e. your worst enemy which is YOU).

Next, I will make you hate me: "You miserable pathetic poor person! I have everything I want! EVERYTHING! More Money, Cars, big house(S), boats, I'm always on vacation because I never need to work! I make so much money! HA HA but YOU! You pathetic little poor person, you will always be poor! Working for little to nothing! What is more, you will never get my money! Because I am RICH! HA HA RICH! And I will keep you poor by being so RICH! I will pay you nothing just so to KEEP YOU POOR!"

Feel that little enemy called "Jealousy"? good.

Now let us examine why taxing because of jealousy of the wealthy will never work, and why taxes need to be directed at what a tax is FOR; and

Why taxing the wealthy only taxes the poor by passing on the "BURDEN" of the TAX:

Let's say I am a wealthy shoe maker, and there is no income tax; I make a shoe for .50 and sell it for $1.00 for a .50 profit.

Now lets say a Jealousy tax (income tax, sales tax, Flattax, Fairtax or other) is created on my shoe of .25;

As a good business man, I will look to maintain my .50 profit;

A good business man will attempt to absorb override ANY expenses by including them in the selling price, this INCLUDES "TAXES".

Below illustrates what happens when you attempt to tax the wealthy harder because of JEALOUSY i.e. fairness.

Cost of Manufacture: .50
Profit: .50
Tax: .25 then .55
Final Cost of product: 1.25 then 1.50
Who pays the tax via "tax form": Shoe Company
Who pays the actual BURDEN of the tax: You the Consumer.
Who benefits: Government-Unions-Corporations

Now lets say that this makes you MAD, and you don't think that this is "FAIR" You are so "JEALOUS" that you want to force them to pay taxes that will reduce their profits; So you tax them harder! (brilliant) You tax them .75 on every shoe!

The Shoe manufacturer realizes that he cannot sell the shoe on the market for 1.75, so to maintain his profit margin, he makes his shoes for less, either by reducing quality, reducing number of workers i.e. "downsizing" or becoming more efficient.

Cost of Manufacture: .25
Profit: .65
Tax: .75
Final Cost of product: 1.65
Who pays the tax via "tax form": Shoe Company
Who pays the actual BURDEN of the tax: You the Consumer.
Who benefits: Government-Unions-Corporations

Now your really MAD! (in more ways than one - as in insanity); So you Tax them even harder!!! 1.00 a shoe!

The Shoe maker cannot manufacturer the shoe in the United States and maintain his profit margin; So he fires his workers and produces his shoes in China and also increases his profit margin.

Cost of Manufacture: 05
Profit: .70
Tax: 1.00
Final Cost of product: 1.75
Who pays the tax via "tax form": Shoe Company
Who pays the actual BURDEN of the tax: You the Consumer.
Who benefits: Government-Unions-Corporations

This makes you HATE the shoe company; and in your Jealous insanity, you tax them 1.25 on every shoe!

The shoe maker closes shop, retires or invests in something different that is taxed less. China makes the shoe for .02 (manufactured in India) and is happy to make .73 per shoe.

Cost of Manufacture: .02
Profit: .73
Tax: 1.25
Final Cost of product: 2.00
Who pays the tax via "tax form": Shoe Company
Who pays the actual BURDEN of the tax: You the Consumer.
Who benefits: Government-Unions-Corporations-China

Now the Consumer is stuck with paying 2.00 a shoe and a tax and bloated government that continues to create more BUREAUCRACIES that impose greater taxes to support their dependency on tax money;

To support their job dependency, they create more REGULATIONS that reduce free trade further.

This is how socialism advances.

Now you think the story ends here....

It gets MUCH better.

See all that FLAT PERCENTAGE, "FAIR", UNENUMERATED tax money?

The Shoe maker creates a Corporation (state born exclusive privilege of cartel) with a few Union officials and lobbies congress for a military shoe contract using mostly India labor and produces a army boot for .05 and sells it to the military for 49.95!!!

You might argue that a graduated income tax would make the company pay more taxes, but that would only compound the problem by giving more money to government, government contracts, Government Unions, Tax supported special interests and undelegated state and federal bureaucracies;

A flat set percentage sales tax would only guarantee increase to government with an increase in the private sector with no oversight or enumeration before it is collected.

Cost of Manufacture: .05
Profit: 48.20
Tax: 1.75
Final Cost of product: 50.00
Who pays the tax via "tax form": Shoe Company
Who pays the actual BURDEN of the tax: You the Consumer.
Who benefits: Government-Unions-Corporations-India

Now do you understand why trying to tax WHO is futile;

This is because it is NOT taxing for the REAL PURPOSE of what taxes are "FOR";

The REAL PURPOSE of Taxes are "WHAT" the tax is paid "FOR" is for NECESSARY SERVICES;

That means ENUMERATED for actual cost of those services ONLY; ..... and "BEFORE" "CONSENSUALY" (Very important) giving it to government.

This LIMITS the amount everyone has to pay.

NOT to throw a "flat" percentage "arbitrary" "tax amount" from either sales, income or property that is collected far in excess of that necessary for needful services, only to create more and more government dependency upon it.

The Democrats use Jealousy to increase Union government bureaucracies and tax supported Special Interest groups;

and the Republican's (those that are corporate capitolists) use the money derived from that jealousy to lobby for large government contracts as well as Union Contracts (private or government).

All are State born "Exclusive Privileged" and undelegated cartels which should not even exist in a free country.

------------

Some important understanding is that:

1.) You cannot base taxation on who pays taxes simply through a "tax form" given to the government, without considering who will actually pay the "BURDEN" of the tax.

2.) Often income tax only creates the role of tax collector on the part of who it collects taxes from, distorting who actually pays the "BURDEN" of taxation.

3.) Where taxes are considered by a service provider, retailer or manufacturer, which is almost considered by every business man, "EVERYONE" pays taxes;

4.) This absolutely discredits any reports that attempt to establish there is a percentage of people who pay Most or ALL the taxes in the United States; as tax forms are far from the exclusive determinator of who pays taxes.

5.) This also discredits any reports that there is anyone who does not pay taxes simply because they do not fill out a tax form;

6.) "ANYONE" who buys a product, hires a service, rents, buys gas, or other, from anyone or ANY entity who considers his own taxation so to establish a price he will receive for that product or service so to be able to pay it, which ANY business man does, PAYS TAXES;

7.) "ANYONE who does ANYTHING" to spend money within the United States "PAYS TAXES";

8.) Those end users of the system will pay the highest percentage of their earnings in this way, as they will be unable to Write-off the tax or transfer it elsewhere onto the price of products etc.

9.) This is why taxing "WHO" pays the tax, instead of limiting to "WHAT" the tax is supposed to be collected for, simply does not work;

10.) Regulation and FLAT percentage taxes, on sales or income, guaranteeing a percentage to government without oversight and consent BEFORE giving it, simply empowers Government and Exclusive privileges and creates waste.

11.) It also flies in the face of those who "attempt to establish" that all illegal aliens do not pay taxes, which "IN FACT THOSE THAT LIVE AND WORK HERE DO";

If they rent, buy products, buy gas, by food or any liquid such as milk or soft drinks or anything while they are here, >>>>THEY ARE PAYING THE "BURDEN OF TAXATION" ATTACHED TO THOSE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.

This is not to say that they should be misusing our laws, it simply establishes a gross misstatement that all aliens, or that anyone that does not pay taxes simply because they do not make out a "income tax form" does not pay taxes. A complete lie;

12.) These type statements derail the American public as to the real problem; and that is not abiding by the Constitutional way taxation is suppose to be; DIRECT CONSENSUAL TAXATION FOR ONLY THOSE THINGS THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN DELEGATED TO TAX THE PEOPLE FOR.

Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788
http://www.pacificwestcom.com/americanpatriotpartynewsletter

Mr. PENDLETON. "Mr. Chairman, this clause does "NOT" give Congress power to impede the operation of ANY PART of the Constitution, (N)or to make >>>"ANY REGULATION" that may affect the interests of the citizens of the Union >>>"AT LARGE".

Mr. GEORGE NICHOLAS,: "....He endeavored to show the committee that it only empowered Congress to make such laws as would be necessary to enable them to >>>>pay the public debts and >>>>provide for the common defence;

<> that this "GENERAL WELFARE" was united, >>>>"NOT" to "the general power of legislation", but to the <>particular power<> of laying and collecting taxes, imposts, and excises, for the purpose of paying the debts and providing for the "common defence",

that is, that they could raise as "much" money as would

pay the

(1) debts

and provide for the

(2) "common defence",

>>>>>"in "CONSEQUENCE" of THIS power".

The clause which was affectedly called the "sweeping clause" contained >>>"NO new grant of power".

To illustrate this position, he observed that, if it had been added at the end of every one of the enumerated powers, instead of being inserted at the end of all, it would be obvious to any one that it was "NO" augmentation of power.

If, for instance, at the end of the clause granting power to lay and collect taxes, it had been added that they should have power to make necessary and proper laws to lay and collect taxes, who could suspect it to be an addition of power?

As it would grant "NO" new power if inserted at the end of each clause, it could not when subjoined to the whole...."

It was clear to the Founder's, that FEDERAL TAXES CAN BE COLLECTED FOR TWO THINGS ONLY!!!!

Review the CONSTITUTIONAL way to collect Taxes that removes costly REGULATION costs, LEGAL and INCARCERATION costs and COMPLIANCE costs:

Learn More:

The "A" or Anonymity Tax system is a
Constitutionally correct tax:
http://www.pacificwestcom.com/patriottax

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

BTW.

I think your "A" tax needs it's own thread. There are huge amounts of people, even here, that don't know what taxes are Constitutional.

I realize that some of "us" don't like paying taxes at all and think they all should be abolished but I'm not one of them. Of course if taxes were Constitutional, I wouldn't be paying income tax to begin with. :)

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

Thankyou - I will Post it.

...

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

I think you haven't went far enough.

The real base for sticking it to the rich, those also that got their money fairly, is greed. "Greed" is okay if tempered, but it has been let loose in plague proportions.

I don't want to stick it to anyone but my government and that's only because they are sticking it to us.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

This is the Corruption of EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES by Governments

The issue of the wealthy "fairly" getting their money has another issue that is rarely discussed, and that is the existence of the government granting "EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES" that should not exist in a free society.

This is covered here: under "Privileges and Contracts"

http://www.pacificwestcom.com/americanpatriotpartynewsletter...

See Also: Virginia Declaration of Rights 1776 - George Mason:

IV "That no man, or "SET OF MEN", are entitled to "exclusive" or separate emoluments or privileges from the community,..."

Corporations, Unions, Tax supported Special Interests, Undelegated Federal and State Bureaucracies, (and ZONING) are all State Born Exclusive Privileges that can not be allowed to exist in a free society;

This is because they turn Free Trade into PRIVILEGED TRADE and Freedom of Contract into PRIVILEGED CONTRACTS.

James Madison Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:

"...If there be any knowledge in my mind of the nature of man, I should think it would be the last thing that would enter into the mind of any man to grant exclusive advantages, in a very circumscribed district, to the prejudice of the community at large..."

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.