9 votes

Judge Napolitano On Spending: 'You Don't Cut Cancer Out One Cell At A Time, You Cut It All Out'

Judge Napolitano On Spending: 'You Don't Cut Cancer Out One Cell At A Time, You Cut It All Out'

Varney & Co | Fox Business | January 3, 2012

http://youtu.be/2Nq_V6Bc65A

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who are all of these butchers

Who are all of these butchers that want to sell bad meat to the public? Do they think that would be a good strategy to grow their business? And no consumer or consumer review agencies would spontaneously emerge reviewing the quality of meat being sold? People who accept the principle of the federal government inspecting everything before it goes to market have to stop saying they believe in the free market. The free market, as I understand it, does not forcefully prevent anyone from making a voluntary exchange. Also, according to this guy, thousands upon thousands of Americans who use completely unregulated marijauna must be getting deathly sick from the poorer and poorer quality of the plant. Or is the quality of the plant being sold improving despite of no federal inspection and actual federal hinderance of research and devolpment of the product?

"Where liberty is, there is my country." -Benjamin Franklin

To continue the metaphor...

To continue the metaphor... Unfortunately, cancer usually returns and ends up killing the patient.

What an idiot...

He's arguing with Judge Napolitano about the government ceasing to borrow money. But at the end the Judge nails him.

He says we both agree we want a government that lives within its means. I want it tomorrow, and you want it eventually, right? Then the idiot says, yes, I think I agree with that.

Well how does he expect it to happen "eventually"?!? Has he not seen that U.S. government liabilities are growing EXPONENTIALLY?

http://www.spickardssigns.com/-%20fotos/us-debt-graph-2020.jpg

Without the right to bear ammunition, the 2nd Amendment right...

may as well be the right to bear paper weights.

This is in response to the Judge's discussion.

The man ever heard of

The man ever heard of radiation?

Very, very, very easy to say.

What is his plan for getting us out of this mess? How is he going to balance the budget?

Ron Paul took a hammer to our budget, and only came away with 700 or so billion.

Plan for eliminating the national debt in 10-20 years:

Overview: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/my-plan-for-reducin...

Specific cuts; defense spending: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-detailed-look-a

Ron Paul's budget cut $1

Ron Paul's budget cut $1 trillion in the first year and balanced in 3.

Rand's budget, I believe, balances in 5.

You still have to take an ax to it, gradually balancing doesn't work like Paul Ryan's "plan"

Actually no. Ron Paul's

Actually no. Ron Paul's budget was mathematically flawed. IIRC, it double-counted some cuts in mandatory spending. Actual cuts were only 707 billion (or so).

He also balanced the budget in three years by using the CBO's terrible assumption that we will have more than 7% in real growth per year over the next 5 years.

Rand Paul's budget also has a mathematical mistake (really only save 450 billion) and uses the same mistakes the CBO makes.

Plan for eliminating the national debt in 10-20 years:

Overview: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/my-plan-for-reducin...

Specific cuts; defense spending: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-detailed-look-a