8 votes

Coulter Tears Into Liberal Gun Hypocrisy: Why Can’t We Publish List Of Women Who Get Abortions?

Coulter Tears Into Liberal Gun Hypocrisy: Why Can’t We Publish List Of Women Who Get Abortions?

by Josh Feldman | 10:39 pm, January 3rd, 2013

Sean Hannity continued his pushback against gun control advocates with Ann Coulter tonight. They focused on how strongly liberals work in the wake of every mass shooting to crack down on guns. Coulter suspected many of them would rather forget the Second Amendment, while continuing to explain her issues with the NRA’s armed guards proposal.

Hannity first brought up the newspaper that published the names of all local gun owners, pointing out the list inadvertently alerts all criminals to which houses do not have guns. Coulter claimed that home invasions are more common in England than in the United States because of their strong gun laws. She asked why gun owners can be publicly identified but criminal records cannot be released in a similar fashion.

Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/coulter-tears-into-liberal-gun-hy...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
the stranger's picture

List Women Who Get Abortions

Ah, the fascist barbie doll Coulter and her hate thine enemy philosophy; consistent, eh?

when you are living extremely comfortably

and you sense, even if only on a subconscious level that this is all thanks to the state, you would be pretty fearful of gun rights to because they risk toppling everything. they can easily carry these thoughts while turning a blind eye to the blatant transfer of wealth going on or some other channels in which government prop up their corrupt lives. as with many other pathological psychotics, they won't even allow themselves to find out what's being transfered. they would stop their own thought dead in its tracks as soon as even a tiny initiation point, a droplet of curiosity, pops up. if it creates a ripple, they would just throw the whole pond out.

What would that do?

In 2004 you could buy a t-shirt from Planned Parenthood that said "I had an abortion." No shame there.


The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

Hitting below the belt

Or in this case, hips works for me.

Want To Boost Hannity's Ratings?

Allow Me To Kick Him In The Nuts On Live TV...

That calls for



The list of gun owners is how the Nazi's disarmed the Jews, union leaders and those publicly against the National Socialism of the party in power.
A few soldiers went to each listed house with a dog and forced a search on the house and property.
"This article addresses German firearms laws and Nazi policies and practices to disarm German citizens, particularly political opponents and Jews. It begins with an account of post-World War I chaos, which led to the enactment in 1928 by the liberal Weimar republic of Germany’s first comprehensive gun control law. Next, the Nazi seizure of power in 1933 was consolidated by massive searches and seizures of
firearms from political opponents, who were invariably described as “communists.”
After five years of repression and eradication of dissidents, Hitler signed a new gun control law in 1938, which benefitted Nazi party members and entities, but denied firearm ownership to enemies of the state. Later that year, in Kristallnacht (the Night of the Broken Glass), in one fell swoop, the Nazi regime disarmed Germany’s Jews.
Without any ability to defend themselves, the Jewish population could easily be sent to concentration camps for the Final Solution. After World War II began, Nazi authorities continued to register and mistrust civilian firearm owners, and German resistence to the Nazi regime was unsuccessful.7"

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty" TJ

Great Find Citizendave

Thank you and Happy New Year!

I'm against almost all most "public" records.

Including voter lists


Bump for Coulter. They should have to reveal this info to their local community for health and safety reasons.


jrd3820's picture

How do you figure?

What good would that information be in terms of community health and safety?




These factors coupled may or may not lead to other issues for the community as one can imagine.


jrd3820's picture


Someone else's personal health risks should not be the communities business. Neither should a gun owners address. I think the newspaper that released these addresses is irresponsible and should be ashamed of themselves. I just do not think Coulter's ideas make any sense either. It is not my business if the lady down the street has health problems due to her abortion. Just like it is not my business to know someone's address just because they have a gun permit. I see where the newspaper was wrong, I just do not see this action or idea to make much sense.