13 votes

.

.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You don't wait for them to come, FORM AN ORGANIZED MILITIA

if you die fighting from your home they'll just call you a gun nut terrorist, and no one will know what happened, read what this man says, and realize that this isn't the end, you have to be creative to win this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqgY8EQTJfs

thanks for pointing this out!!

great article. will pass along.

Christians should not be warmongers! http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html

Ever see, "Straw Dogs"?

The protagonist was willing to take anything, even humiliation by his wife, until he knew he had to either stand and fight the bullies or die.

When enough people find those their only options, some, at least, will do the right thing; and "some" may be enough.

Sad To Say But

..Kevin & Marina Krim, who suffered the Murder of two of their three children, after the publicizing of the Bankster Fraud News Story have now resurfaced, to be used as "tools" for the Anti-Gun Movemnet it seems.....Have they been sequestered knowing they are to be used for this nefarious agenda?
Perhaps they need to go public and "stand up" as you reference here.
See:
http://www.dailypaul.com/260706/cnbc-digital-vps-children-mu...

Many NEW links are in the comments section, Please Bump this!

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

It will be confiscation by attrition.

There will be rewrites of laws which will use the ban on Felon's owning firearms as a basis. They will expand this to high misdemeanors first and then proceed to things such as a mere indictment of traffic violations showing you don't respect the law and cannot be allowed to have fire arms. Feinstein is merely a sideshow, a slow boiling frog has no clue....and we are all in the same pot.

If not us than who?

News reporters who encourage such crimes need to go first.

Those in media who promote the idea that the constitution is dead deserve no first amendment protections.

If the second amendment is dead in their eyes then the first amendment is dead in the eyes of their viewers too.

As such, news rooms and reporters in the field are clearly just another military target, and a primary one at that.

.

...

...

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

I honestly don't think they will come for our guns.

There are two things happening:

1. Continued gun crimes that cause a part of society to WILLINGLY relinquish their guns and call for gun control.

2. Continued threats from TPTB to dismantle the 2nd ammendment causing the gun-owning part of society to become twitchy and ready for a fight...just need a TRIGGER to cause people to react. This will be their impetus to create order our of chaos (chaos THEY created) and the order will be obtained with force via population control weapons.

Military law and all that goes with that will be the new order of the day. And there will still be people bleeting, "Whatever it takes to keep us safe."

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

People are only willing to fight to keep their guns.

It seems that the government does whatever it wants and everyone just sits and whines about it but then they talk about how they will fight to keep their guns. If this is the case then why should government try and take peoples guns? Americans have already proven they wont use them no matter what the government does so why not just let people keep there toys and then continue to run roughshod over our rights? Gun owners aren't hindering their plans.

I do not believe most will even do that.

When the ban comes, as it surely will as nothing meaningful is being done to stop it, what will these fighters do? Go down to the ban and stop the confiscation? That will end in a bloody mess. Will they wait until the cops come for their PERSONAL gun, and then make their stand all alone, one gun against as SWAT team?
This needs PREVENTED, not fought after the fact.
And you are right. I am sort of dazed by all the fuss over Obamacare. No one even whimpered when they were forced to buy insurance for their car - and "no fault" was not an option.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

doesn't look like this guy

doesn't look like this guy waited around to be disarmed.

http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/featured/white-death-si...

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

With the exception of the insurance

comment I agree because mandatory auto insurance does not compare to Obamacare. Simply put autos are man made and are subject to mans regulation AND you only have to buy auto insurance if you plan to drive an automobile on public roads. If I don't drive an automobile then I am not subject to that law.

On the other hand, I am not made by government motors and should not be subject to personal regulation and since I don't use the bogus "healthcare" system then I should not be subject to that law. I am only beholden to GOD for my existence and I will not accept the medical industry as my God.

Do you understand about "no fault?"

Free market insurance. The way insurance is mandated, I have to buy enough insurance to cover YOUR 100,000 Lex-cedes-orsche. I drive a paid for POS, worth about 1,000 if I can sell it on a day it runs. If I want to risk taking my car as a loss, I can. If you want to cover your beast for total replacement, you can. But to make ME buy coverage for people who drive beasts is absurd. The insurance companies make insane profits on this model, where no-fault would allow people to decide how much they WANT to insure their OWN cars for.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

I understand what you are saying.

It is ridicules to make some poor working stiff pay for some rich jerks $100,000 automobile. So I agree that there should be a limit on liability and the one who makes the decision to drive an overprices status symbol on the road should be the one responsible for the overage. And we actually do make the decision on coverage for our OWN cars which is why you are only required to carry liability.

To say that I should carry YOUR liability in total is wrong and we haven't even discussed personal injury. For instance who should be responsible if you run over a pedestrian? Should I have to be self insured just to walk so I can take responsibility for someone elses fault of running me over? In such a case would my insurance go up if you run over me? To say that I should insure myself, while walking, so someone else doesn't have to take responsibility, while driving, is exactly what Obamacare is about.

That is why auto insurance is not the same as Obamacare.

Not the same, but there are similarities

Forced to buy an insurance product regardless of your personal insurance wants/needs being the one I am talking about.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.