7 votes

3 Days Before Sandy Hook Shooting United Way Posts Condolences Online

If THIS is real, all I can say is WTF? I don't watch TV but I'd like to know if ANY of the countless inconsistencies are being mentioned by the presstitutes from the MSM. Maybe someone can explain how this google search could be faked or is a hoax. I'm not sure how to go about verifying this. Enter yet another bizarre accusation about Sandy Hook.

(Thomas Dishaw) More twists to the Sandy Hook narrative. On December 11 Google Indexed the United Way website that offered condolences to the family’s of Sandy Hook.

This is a full three days before the actual shooting that took place on December 14 2012. Below is a excerpt from the December 11 united Way page.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

ALWAYS debunk me or set me straight if I post errors or bogus

$hit. Downvotes don't hurt my feelings. I only look for the truth. I try to use restraint from posting things that lack any type of source documentation or things that just stir up the mud...but I sometimes don't think before I post. Other times I post things because I can pretty much count on the people here to already have some background or additional info about whatever.

At first I really thought it was a reach when so many people started quetioning events at sandy hook. Now, there are so many things that just don't add up that I really wonder WTF?....but like so many other things...I guess we may never know the truth.

ANOTHER early donation page: Just who is Desaree Juarez?

GoFundMe donation page by Desaree Juarez created on Dec 13th.
So we have a 1)Soto facebook page 2)United Way posts 3)GoFundMe donation page all set up BEFORE the event.

1) It is easy to believe that many Facebook profiles are of non-existent people managed by military intelligence operations.

2) It is easy to believe that these same people who perpetrated these hoaxes fund their operations from unsuspecting, charitable, but naive people. These people also have access because Desaree's donation page was linked at a prominent local mainstream media NBC website.

3) The 9-11 'victims' fund is the same thing. Millions of dollars raised go straight to the media fakery perps who manufactured fake victims and fake events. Ouch.

Also check this pic out of the 'official memorial':


9-11 Media Fakery: Did anyone die on 9-11?


9-11 Actors:

Pysops.. media.. actors.. propagandists... disinfo agents.. fake videos.. fake photos

Can I Debunk This Without Getting Voted Down?

When I searched Google for - newtown.uwwesternct.org/ and then used search tools for the date December 1,2012 - December 11th,2012 I got the results below;


There's a 2nd result - RISING OUTLAWS | CHANGE IS HERE that says DEC 11,2012. However click on the article and you'll see that it was in fact published on 18, December 2012 based on the blog software they use. I suppose they could change this date but knowing Google I doubt this date we're seeing means much of anything.


This could probably be proven elsewhere. I also think sometimes the dates appear on posts and maybe not the root domain unless the root domain has updating blog posts. OKay that's too complicated.

The bigger the claim, the better the evidence needs to be. Right now, the liberty movement is flooded with conspiracy claim without hard evidence. If this movement wants to investigate these things, then we need to PHYSICALLY get out of the house and go find and interview people, THEN POST THE EVIDENCE ONLINE. Not just hearsay and suggestion.

Please do!

If you can debunk then DO IT - screw the down votes. Thank you for seeking the truth, and bringing it here.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.


basically a search for sandy hook at the dailypaul.com 1-11 dec 2012, first link is an image grab, second is google



Possibly debunked, but not by that google example

Note that in what came up in your google search for Sandy Hook & the Daily Paul between Dec 1-11, NO POST related to Sandy Hook appears for that time period. Despite the listed "Sandy Hook comments," if you go to those posts, you won't find them there. I don't know how google searches, how and what it links, but it appears that maybe it went to the Daily Paul and found posts for the indicated dates (any posts) WHERE someone who'd commented on that post had also commented on Sandy Hook - somewhere else at the website, some other time; well, in any event, some indirect connection. That's likely why, for all those Sandy Hook comments, you'll find an elipsis... before them. In other words, what you pulled up did not show any reference to Sandy Hook at the Daily Paul for the time period Dec 1-11, 2012.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

Here is more on this

I think this is the guy who started this story:

There were comments this morning indicating this type of dating was not accurate, so I let it go. Now I see he has posted a reply / explanation. I do not know enough about computers to say if he is right or wrong, maybe someone else can say?

And they were more like asking for money than offering condolences...

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Interesting. Can anyone

Interesting. Can anyone comment on this? I assume it's nothing, but I'm not sure about how these searches and dates work.

This has been debunked as far as I'm concerned

I assume it's nothing.


1) Yes
2) No
3) I don't know

Assumption: A decision based upon no knowledge of the matter.