21 votes

Alex Jones: Best Night of Television Ever

Jon Rappoport
January 8, 2013

Piers Morgan (CNN) thought he might pump up his horrendous ratings and avoid having to go back to England. So he invited Alex Jones to come east and appear on his show.

They would discuss gun control and the petition to have Morgan deported. It would be good television. An interesting conversation. Perhaps things would get contentious.

But Morgan’s producers and bookers had made a fatal error of judgment.

To say Alex was loaded for bear is a vast understatement.

He crashed the television party in a way it’s never happened before.

You could call it: the internet invades mainstream media. But that doesn’t begin to do it justice.

This was one man attacking the whole rotting corpse of major media, attacking the fascists of the federal government, attacking the psychiatric/pharmaceutical cartel for dispensing drugs that cause people to kill other people, attacking the host of the show for daring to come to these shores with his putrid put-on Brit arrogance, attacking the brain-dead premise that fewer gun murders equals a far, far better nation (England), swearing an oath that the US government will not disarm the citizenry…and Alex made all this happen in just the first seven minutes of the interview.

You could go back in the archives and comb through the history of television in this country and never find seven minutes like this. Never.

It broke through the fake civility of moronic, pundit-driven, stacked-to-the-ceiling-with-utter-bullshit news programs like a car driving through a showroom window at 80mph.

Go to infowars and watch it.

Then tell yourself you’re not dreaming, because you’re not. It happened.

If you were, by chance, tuned to the BCS championship game between Alabama and Notre Dame and missed the real slaughter on CNN, catch it.

According to Alex, one of Pier’s producers broke down and cried during the interview. Oh dear. Horrid. I hope the producer had friends to console her in their little mutually constructed elite bubble. Cocktails, tranqs, perhaps a visit to a shrink might be in order. No doubt, this is a case of PTSD, and might necessitate a long recovery.

No, the idiots at CNN were definitely not ready for this. They were blindsided. Piers tried to remain calm. That was his only strategy. He would be the voice of reason. Stiff upper lip and all that.
It worked about as well as waving a feather in front of a typhoon.
Which, when you think about it, is how the people of England handle their fascist government and their falling-apart society. “Look at us, we’re clueless with feathers.”

No doubt Piers is telling himself he stood up to the cave man from Texas, revealing to the American people how pernicious gun owners are. But that wasn’t it. That wasn’t it all.

Instead, this was cardboard television reality taking a dozen torpedoes amidships.

Alex did it exactly the way you’re supposed to do it when you want to destroy the whole stinking mess all at once. You give no quarter. You go on the attack from the first moment. You don’t let up.
You ignore the nicey-nice stuff.

I’m sure there are some boomer gun advocates out there who think Alex “presented an unfortunate face of the responsible gun-owner community.” They’re dead wrong. They don’t understand what an attack against tyranny requires. They never have.

You put the fascists on the defensive. That’s rule number one. You put them through the wall into the next county. You hit them with the truth so hard they never recover. That’s the goal.

It happened last night.

I watched the whole curtain of the television Matrix explode. I watched it with a joy that comes from knowing, for a long time, what such a moment would look like if it ever came to pass.

Then it did.

Thank you, CNN. This was your finest moment, your only authentic moment in all your years of building an insane consensus about reality.

Thanks, Alex. You came through like a champion.

Jon Rappoport
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

my take on it

I think he did a pretty legit job. At first when he did the british accident i thought man we screwed up but the thing he is he wasnt doing it for the dailypaul crowd who love to hear well thought out, reasoned debates with statistics , etc

He was doing it for the brain dead zombies who have a 2 minute attention span that may have even been flipping over from the notre dame alabama game . None of these zombies even gave 2 shits about larry pratt interview or wayne la pierre or the marine. As soon as their interview is over all their short term memories forget what larry pratt was even talking about if they paid attention.

His antics were the trojan horse to slip in real facts and perhaps if even lets say 10% decide to youtube alex jones and watch some documentaries they might wake up and tell their friends to spread the word

SteveMT's picture

The point of traveling to do this interview in person:

The volume could not be lowered, the screen could not be turned off, and there could be no technical difficulties when the interview is done right in studio. CNN wanted a ratings boost, and they got it, but not anywhere close to the way they had envisioned.

Not a fan of AJ's "in your

Not a fan of AJ's "in your face" method. I much prefer the reasoned, polite way that Ron Paul tears apart statist arguments.

That said, AJ did get in some shots but I wish he would have pressed on two points.

- The 2nd amendment exists to protect us from tyrannical governments. The millions mrdered by Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot are well known. An armed populace insures us from it from happening here. You say no way Americans would elect such psychopaths anyway? What about just a serious central planner, like Mao? Would 30 million Chinese peasants have starved to death when Mao prohibited them from family farming if they had guns to resist?

- While the murder rate in GB is lower than the US, the violent crime rate is much higher. Could that be because criminals there don't fear for their own welfare when committing crimes? Don't we want criminals thinking twice about robbing, raping, assaulting? Don't we want them fearing that their potential victim may in fact be armed?

Piers is just your typical progressive, easy to debate because, like most progressives, he's incapable of looking at the unforeseen consequences of his proposed intervention. It's just another form of the broken window fallacy that the progressive so easily falls victim to. So easy to counter.

I must be willing to give up what I am in order to become what I will be. Albert Einstein

My response

to people who want to quote how many murders are committed by "guns" (compared to other sources) is to quote Archie Bunker from "All in the Family"
"Would it make you feel better if they had been pushed out a window"?"

Do people actually think "murder by gun" is somehow worse than other murders?

He Did Talk About That Stuff

Listen again.


Love him or hate him, AJ got

Love him or hate him, AJ got everybodys attention thats for sure.

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams