22 votes

Sandy Hook. Emilie Parker theory.

I'm sure I'm not the first one to come up with this theory, but here it is:

This video

http://youtu.be/cy4CPgDOLEY

makes a pretty compelling case that the picture it analyzes has Emilie Parker photoshopped in.

Going over the Parker family photos, it's possible that Emilie has been photoshopped into each one.

Then, what seems to be the same girl appears in the photo shoot with Obama. What could this mean?

Here's a theory that would explain it:

Emilie Parker never existed. What we are seeing is an older and younger version of the same girl photoshopped next to each other.

I assume the girl with Obama is provably not Emilie Parker, it's the "middle" sister. The girl in the older family photos is the same girl, a year or two back, with her current self photoshopped in, to create someone who never was.

This is also supported by Robbie Parker's behavior in the famous video. All he would have lost in this scenario is an imaginary character, so he might have a hard time mustering authentic-looking grief.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who did the PArker family bury?

1) Its an empty coffin
2) There is a child in the coffin but it has NO genetic relation to Robbie Parker.
3) There is a child in the coffin and it DOES genetically match Robbie Parker and that opens a very dark door of possibilities.

"First rule of Government Spending: Why build one when you can have 2 at twice the price?"
-S.R. Hadden

From the film, Stepford Wives

" And then I asked myself, where would nobody notice a town full of robots? Connecticut!"

Colchester, New London County, Connecticut

The Xmas Card Photo below PROVES This Video

Look at that xmas card photo:

Her hair is NOT perfect -> you can see the background behind the strands of her hair.
Also - you can see some of those pieces of her hair in front of Robbie Parker's shirt.

I'd say that photo is real.
Which means the photo in the video - clearly a fake.

Also - can facial recognition software or something judge if someone is from the same family? Robbie Parker's kids look NOTHING like him or his "wife."

The wife looks fake. The smile is not genuine. You can always tell by looking at the eyes. She is not happy, she is exerting effort.

Awesome breakdown. This is interesting stuff.

Emilie is on the LEFT

She is the LEFTMOST child.

Hollywood Life made the mistake when they made that picture.

http://hollywoodlife.com/2012/12/16/robbie-parker-forgives-g...

Emilie is seen here with her father.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/12/emilie-parker-...

She is clearly the leftmost child in the family picture.

AGAIN! Emilie is "JUST OFF TO THE RIGHT" in the X-mas card!

http://pmchollywoodlife.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/emilie-p...

Is she their least favorite Kid?
Does the photographer have any animosity towards her?

Or was she just pasted into the photo.

"First rule of Government Spending: Why build one when you can have 2 at twice the price?"
-S.R. Hadden

Disgusting

It's disgusting so many in the liberty movement are entertaining this horseshit. Same people who thing Alex Jones did a "great job" on Piers Morgan. Sickening.

deacon's picture

have any proof

of the same ones who think AJ did a great job?
or was that just pulled out of a hat?

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

explain it then

This whole shooting stinks. I don't trust any of it.

"First rule of Government Spending: Why build one when you can have 2 at twice the price?"
-S.R. Hadden

my question is the few adults killed there

don't they have more connections than these kids? if those were imaginary people i suppose it would be easier to debunk those

what about the shooter and his dead mother? they just vanished? if you say the entire thing was staged. it might be quicker to just get his surviving brother to come out

Bring it all out, expose them

MORE family members who only sound as though they are crying. Every one of them have white eyes, not blood shot from crying as they make their 'crying' sounds and not a tear ever, ever to be seen. Either Visine is being passed out like candy or something isn't 'real' here. The pictures are a bad photoshop job. This is fake!

Deekey

Please consider my debunking of this theory...

Let's examine a few things that some may not know. Emilie Parker's family lived in Ogden, Utah (I happen to live in Utah as well) before moving to Connecticut. Their family belongs to the LDS Church (more commonly known as the Mormon Church). Because much of their extended family still lives here, several relatives, (aunt, grandpa, and such) have been featured in local newspaper stories. Here are a couple of examples:

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865569355/Emilie-Parker-l...
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865568848/Former-Ogden-fa...

Also, the members of their religious congregation knew the family and Emilie as well. Here is an official article from the LDS Church that talks about Emilie, and specifically mentions her Stake President, (a leadership position in the church) David Christiansen:

http://www.lds.org/church/news/you-could-see-the-savior-thro...

So now you have to believe one of two things: either David Christiansen is a paid actor and a liar, or he doesn't exist at all. But assuming that he also doesn't exist means that the LDS Church is involved in the hoax at the highest levels of their leadership.

So assuming your theory is correct, it doesn't involve just Robbie and his wife as paid actors, but dozens and dozens of people, many of whom are held up as pillars of integrity in their religious communities.

Think about this for a second. If you want someone to believe in a hoax, do you corroborate the story in a sparsely populated state hundreds of miles away in a couple of local newspapers that 99.9% of Americans will never read? That's quite a diligent effort. It's one thing to keep an intelligence secret at the highest levels of government. It is quite another to invent a person when literally hundreds or thousands of people would know. I'm not saying I know exactly what happened that day, but I am saying that I find Emilie Parker not existing almost impossible to believe.

I would also like to address another issue, which is the emotional state of Robbie Parker, which many have called odd or fake. LDS people have a very strong belief in the afterlife. Not only that, but we believe (I'm a member as well) that family relationships last beyond the grave. If you go to a Mormon funeral, you may not see as much crying or mourning that you would be accustomed to, because Mormons believe that this life is just a short time when compared to eternity, and although it is extremely painful to be separated from family, we hold the view that we will be with our loved ones again, and continue the same family relationships. I thank you for your time and hope that this explains some of the things that many have asked about.

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."-Samuel Adams
http://brushfiresinthemind.blogspot.com/

deacon's picture

if she is known

when did they move to Utah?
http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/crime/little-girl-killed-in-con...
also the time line without the NM move doesn't add up
that family moved from Ogden Utah 8 months ago to SH
there are 3 months kids are not in school,they would have had to
of moved before kindergarten was up
if they moved from rio rancho to utah,the numbers still do not add up
which story is right?
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

According to this article...

They moved from Ogden to Connecticut
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865569077/Emilie-Parker-f...
"Numerous fundraisers already are under way for the young girl's family, who relocated to Connecticut from Ogden within in the past year"

Other news stories say they moved to New Mexico from Utah.

But I think what we have here is just a case of the media getting some facts wrong, which they often do, and then we jump to conclusions like people never existed or there is a whole big conspiracy or cover-up

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."-Samuel Adams
http://brushfiresinthemind.blogspot.com/

deacon's picture

you think??

thinking is not knowing,media getting the facts wrong?
yes, but at this point who knows if any were right
so you didn't debunk a thing,what you did was remove what you
didn't like,and kept what fit your mold,for your outcome

wouldn't the fact the media conspired be a theory or truth?
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

But you haven't explained...

...where all the dozes of people who knew Emilie personally have come from. Are they paid actors or did they come out of thin air as well? You see a simple discrepancy in the timeline and you assume that people never existed. You are doing the exact same thing you accuse me of doing, removing everything that is inconvenient and only accepting what you already accept as truth.

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."-Samuel Adams
http://brushfiresinthemind.blogspot.com/

I'm not sure what to believe...

...about SH in general, since the story has changed so much; but assuming there's nothing to this Emilie Parker theory, what do you think explains the anomalies in the photo?

I don't know about anyone else...

...but every family picture my family has taken has been heavily photoshopped. Granted, I have a big family, so it's almost impossible to get a picture where everyone is smiling and doing it in the same picture. So what do we do? Photoshop. If my family were ever involved with something like this, everybody would be saying, "what is wrong with this family? they have the most doctored photos of all time! every single one!"

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."-Samuel Adams
http://brushfiresinthemind.blogspot.com/

ecorob's picture

I don't know about anyone else...

but every family picture my family has taken has NEVER been photoshopped!

Am I that backward?

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

That sounds...

...plausible to me. If ALL of the photos of Emilie had the same oddities that would make me wonder.

deacon's picture

no i haven't removed any truth

as a matter of fact,i pointed out more
discrepancies in their own reporting
and you came back with"i assume that people never existed"
you came up with the debunking theory,and i showed you someone is wrong
and even if they didn't move from rio rancho to utah,the timeline is still off,so therefor it is wrong,this does not make me wrong
this makes one of the stories wrong,or maybe both are
lets say she went to knd,in utah,moved to SH 7-8 before she was shot
did she finish school in utah first?
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

removed

double post

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."-Samuel Adams
http://brushfiresinthemind.blogspot.com/

Those Girls look TOO much alike

I say it's the same kid at different ages. Yup.

skippy

Ha.

I thought I had a decent theory explaining how Emilie Parker might have been generated from thin air, and solving the mystery of who it is next to Obama two days after the massacre.

Maybe nobody reads that far down?

they

should.

"The two weakest arguments for any issue on the House floor are moral and constitutional"
Ron Paul

Great video!

This is yet further evidence of a HOAX...

9-11 Media Fakery: Did anyone die on 9-11?
http://www.cluesforum.info/

http://www.septemberclues.info/

9-11 Actors:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE

Pysops.. media.. actors.. propagandists... disinfo agents.. fake videos.. fake photos

I am a Graphic Designer with almost 10 years of experience

and I have to agree that the photo shown here is a doctored photograph. All the observations stated are, in my own professional opinion, correct.

This is quite amateur as well. I have done several jobs where people needed to be "placed" into a group photo and it may just be my detailed nature but I would have EASILY added some shadowing and the straw that's cut off. Also what immediately jumps out is the completely wrong 'white levels' in "Emilie's" shirt which are higher (brighter) than the other four. Also "Emilie" has more contrast to her image as well, you can tell everyone else looks slightly faded or dull. It's very slight and you may not see it if you don't do this as a profession.

Same evidence came out about 9/11 "victim" photos FYI.

It won't be long before we see 100% Computer Generated "Video Footage" that we will be shown as authentic. That is, if we haven't already. Remember, that the Powers That Were have people in the Hollywood biz where they make realistic Special Effects that look unnoticeably real already.

Be Vigilant!

EDIT:

Can anyone find this photo? I can't seem to see it anywhere and I'd like to take a closer look at it.

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

deacon's picture

lol brother

i haven't graphically designed anything
you should see my computer table!!
and i saw that mistake :) j/k
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

Here's the page where I found

Here's the page where I found the video linked: http://www.truthin7minutes.com/

This guy, whether or not you agree with his worldview, has a lot of relevant information in one place.

Thanks

All I was able to find was a news clip with that image. Same one I'm assuming was used in the above video. Same anomalies are present.

Aside from these anomalies there is also one telling sign that something is off here: Body Language.

You can see how "Emilie" looks "out of place" and it looks very odd that the parents have their embraces around the other two children yet "Emilie" is not a part of that "family" embrace and off to the side and behind her "father".

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

same thing in two family pictures!!

Emilie is off to the side, nobody is holding her in both pictures and also in the father daughter picture.