12 votes

Oh Dee-a...The Queen - The Queen Has Changed A Royal Rule Which Has The Brits Quiiite Upset Indeed...Ooh My...


The Queen has overturned a rule that had been in place since 1917.

The rule required a male heir to be first in line for the crown, but due to Kate's pregnancy announcement in December, that rule will be extracted.

The new rule states any gender will have a stake in line for royalty.

If the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have a girl, she will be third in line for the throne.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not exactly.

Male-preference cognatic primogeniture, which dates back to the beginning of time, has not changed. There has, however, apparently been a proposal to move the United Kingdom to absolute cognatic primogeniture. In the former (and current) system, the line of succession goes through all of the king's male children, eldest to youngest, then through all of the king's female children, eldest to youngest. Under the latter, proposed system, the line of succession goes through all of the king's children, regardless of gender, eldest to youngest.


More to the point, however, this is the actual rule change, and it's entirely cosmetic. Since 1917, the only great-grandchild of the sovereign who held the title "Prince" was the first male child of the first male child of the Prince of Wales (i.e., Charles' first grandson). Now all children of the Prince of Wales' (Charles) eldest son (William) will hold the title "Prince" or "Princess" (Kate's baby, and any future babies).

It's a PR move.


Who should care about those

aristocratic elite globalist thieves anyway.

"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." (Dr. Seuss)


You talk about sheeples.

The gun-less sheeples of Britain who pay 80% taxes must love their servitude.

They might as well keep worshiping their stupid-ass royalty.

They're all serfs and too indoctrinated to know it.



"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

The Queen is like a leach

on the backs of peasants.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

Was a Royal Dog ever seriously cpnsidered

for pro-forma head of state? Ask the Brits is they have any spare royal dogs. We could also use one for ever seat in the house and senate.

There is nothing strange about having a bar of soap in your right pocket, it's just what's happening.

i don't understand how any of their system even works

And I don't think that I care enough to try lol. I've got family over there and I feel bad for them to have to put up with that place. I wish they would just move back to Ireland or come here..

Homeland security statement: patriotism is now considered terrorism.
I love www.isidewith.com shared it with everyone I know. If anything they realize its not just a red and blue idiot running for reelection.

ecorob's picture

If I were one of Princess Diana's two sons...

I might be getting a bit worried!

Also, with Charles, William, and Harry, wouldn't that make "her" 4th?

But, back to my point, I don't think the old inbred bitch of a queen wants ANYthing to do with Diana's blood line on her throne.

Just sayin'

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Wouldn't That Produce More Heirs?

If you live in the U.S., you might be interested to know that the Declaration of Independence says what you said, much more elegantly.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

Does it really matter..

Does it really matter..

"Hell is empty, and all the devils are here" (Shakespeare)
RP 2012~ Intellectual Revolution.

uhhhh. the royals!

If ever there was an example of the people having no choice...
Check out this video


Protect your assets and profit from the greatest wealth transfer in history.


the queen and her inbred family of theives should be stripped of their wealth and forgotten. The money should be redistributed to the countries they have occupied.

These royal people have been

These royal people have been plundering the world for centuries:
a. They caused the Irish famine and mass migration
b. Ethnic cleansing of aboriginal people in Australia.
c. Starvation of people in India.
d. Colonization of middle East.
etc. etc.

ecorob's picture

would this be...


its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Obama has way more power than the current queen

Hard to make fun of any other royalty with our own Imperial Families running a-muck and talking about Executive Orders.

“The devil...the prowde spirite...cannot endure to be mocked.” Thomas Moore

As a British supporter of liberty, it's just a distraction.

The monarchy these days to the running of the country is meaningless.

I tried to think of an american equivalent and I think I've got it. It's like the Prom King and Queen you see in the movies. They've nothing to do with the running of the system (school) but are a symbol of a lot that's wrong with it.

It's been that way since parliament fought a revolution and chopped Charles II's head off. In part for levying of taxes without representation & parliamentary consent...

In all fairness it does at least stop us having a powerful executive branch. I think it's much harder for a Prime Minister than a President to become a de facto king.


the Bank Of England, Rothschild Central Bank, owns the the FED!

HENCE Rothschild, who controls the Bank of England and the FED and the Royal Family Billions seems to actually be the power behind every throne including the USA.

There is your puppet master controlling it all, and that includes controlling OBAMA and the US military.

Is it that simple?

The rabbit hole ends there?

Honestly, Obama doesn't have the power he believes he has... His continued overstepping and abuse of his Constitutionally Limited power will be his downfall. (Or if I am wrong, ours)

Our "King" has Feet of Clay.

No. It is a bunny farm

and they all are the same kind of greedy egoistical power-money hungry tyrants. Obama is their man. Were he an honest man like Ron Paul he would not play their game. The people of the world are trash to these tyrants. They do not have the same values as the ordinary person.

I don't think so.

Don't think that bloodline of power has retrieved any of its global tentacles.

gw bush knelt before the queen.

Answer this

Who is the "Commander in Chief" of the largest military the world has ever seen?

Who has their finger on the button of 1,000s of nukes?

Who blatantly killed one of their own 16 year old children with a drone and got away with it?

I could go on...

Not Necessarily

Custom has it that any challenger has a chance at the throne before the coronation ceremony to dispute the inheritor of the Crown when a Knight rides through Westminster Abbey asking this question. Granted this means has not been used in some time, yet it is still on the books. In essence it is more like an election by the English people in this case. Thus are 2 methods of sucession; Inheritance and election.

Indeed it is a challenge and it is based in history.


F Kings & Queens, F politicians and anyone else that has

a superiority complex. I am born a free man and I am the master of my soul. I ask not to lead anyone and I ask no one to lead me. So to kings and queens to governments and corporations my final answer is still the same, NO!


Waiting In Line For The Throne

...certainly sucks. Especially at concerts and sporting events.

lol +1... exactly what I

lol +1... exactly what I think of the "throne".

In the Old Days...

Harry would have had his minions waiting to off the baby at the earliest opportunity. Thank god we are so evolved and modern now. oh, wait...

Hey common guys, don't be so tough on the Queen

Her family is so dysfunctional, probably due to being genetically scrambled from many generations of interbreeding, she is just hoping for an heir with some semblance of normalcy. LOL

I say, "Off wi' 'eir 'eads!" what, what?

I say, "Off wi' 'eir 'eads!" what, what?

No, there is no constitution in Britain, just a rubbish heap of rules and regs that get trampled by the dirty old drug-pushing Queen whenever she feels like it. Her inept inbred moron of a son lives off the revenues of Cornwall and Devonshire, while her stupid sister gets half the kitty of Lincolnshire to blow away at Baccarat in Cannes.

Every time some socialite on E! says "The royals bring in more revenues from tourists than they could ever spend," I say that's total crap. Nobody goes to London because there is a Queen sitting on her throne (the porcelain one) counting her opium money with lavendar gloves.

I mean, Vienna is full of palaces and tourists. They haven't had a drooling monarch on the throne in 90 years. England ought to give the guy in a black hood a try.

"Off wi' 'eir 'eads!"

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

I can't believe this royalty

I can't believe this royalty crap is still tolerated in 2012.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

Boot licking runs through their veins.

Just put a crown on your head and start passing out feathered uniforms and soon your regime will be in charge. They'll bow down begging you to save them.

or even 2013

Happy New Year! ;)

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.