15 votes

What did the founding fathers of America mean by ' the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.'?

After reading Micheal Nystrom's blog post about the Battles of Concord and Lexington and numerous posts about the hot topic concerning the attack on the 2nd amendment I thought that a post on this topic would be appropriate.

In 1775 Lord Dartmouth ordered General Gage to take action against the colonials. As a result Gage sent 800 British soldiers to confiscate the 24-pound shot cannon at Concord, one of the most formidable attacking weapons of the era. The equivalent today could be considered to be a tactical ballistic missile.

'Pitcairn knew the cannon had been buried on the property. Jones was ordered at gunpoint to show where the guns were buried. These turned out to be three massive pieces, firing 24-pound shot, that were much too heavy to use defensively, but very effective against fortifications, with sufficient range to bombard the city of Boston from other parts of nearby mainland.' Fischer, David Hackett (1994). Paul Revere's Ride.

So you can say that the Revolution started because the British were going to confiscate a weapon large enough to possibly blockade the port of Boston.

So does that answer the question of what the heros of the American Revolution were speaking of when they said 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.'?

What do the rest of ya'll think?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I have a right to bear arms

I have a right to bear arms
from my knuckles to my elbows.
I have a right to stand up
for myself and for my fellows.

I'll stand against you should you try
to put me in some gallows
and should you ever ask me why
I'll gladly tell you

Friend, now that we're clear,
I'm glad that you're here.

It was probably the pandas.

I think it means that handcuffs are an abomination

and a disgrace.

It was probably the pandas.