Anderson Cooper on now talking about staged Sandy Hook & FLA Professor

but he is right this time. Mental anxiety dwelling in an unfocused mind, added to the parroting and peer pressure of the collective, creates wonders. But I disagree with Cenk that medical treatment can always help.

Everything Anderson said, along with his "experts", was carefully measured to sound reasonably objective while inserting all the fear and loathing they could of anyone's respectful questioning of reported inconsistency at Sandy Hook. They chose to pounce on what may be perceived as the weakest link, ie. the crisis actors accusations, to make it sound like the prof. started with that, when the foundation of his questioning began much earlier.

The professor knew that without live coverage, anything he said would be edited so as to serve their media agenda, and so he avoided their snare. He didn't need to conclude with a, "who dun it", to point out a long list of official AND media revision and aversions that are other than what we should be expected if all was likely just as, "the officials", concluded, eh?

They accuse of paranoia, or unreasonable fear and doubt; but will not report this profs list of questions in context, lest he somehow appear more reasonable than they wish to portray him.

Thanks for the CXA tip.

But meh. They probably know all about me. And they know I know that.

And their tool is an insignificant pretty boy to me, that I never watch or by accident.

Till then, they can all choke on that:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment

OUCH ! How did that feel, sweeties ?

... in the building, around the time the shooting started.

You said it so perfectly.

I'd like for your paragraph to "go viral."

... uses the SAME standard of evidence and accountability for BOTH sides.

Any person who takes one side's claims as valid WITHOUT evidence is NOT a serious person.

....

and I totally think that this was a false flag of some nature. Who mentioned Mossad? Not me.

1. Why does it take the cops 20 minutes to go 2 miles to the school from the police station?

2. Why does the state medical examiner, a man with 33 years experience, not able to answer the simplest questions about what the forensic evidence revelaed, deferring to his handlers, er first repsonder cops standing behind him? All the while reiterating that he knows how stuff goes in court and such AND changing the narrative from handguns to rifles and such.

3. Why does AG Eric Holder, the man who said 20 years ago that "well just have to brainwash" people into accepting gun control, have a private meeting with the first responders?

4. There are reports of multiple shooters, some of which may be mistaken for dads who came for their kids and were suspicious, but still unexplained is why the back of that one vehicle was shot out.

5. The news reports are full of "anonymous" law enforcement sources. So much of our information comes from government employees. Just five or ten years ago, this would have been percieved as a trustworthy source, but those days are long, long gone. How many times can we be lied to and not even question it?

So what serious person would swallow all this without asking "how to we really know this is true?" without driving up there and looking around for ourselves? This doesn't even get into the fact that the prop manager for the batman movie, with Sandy Hook on the map was from Newown and was killed in a car crash back in April.

I have to agree. I listened to over 30 minutes of the Prof. and I didn't hear anything close to concrete evidence, except a few far fetched guesses of what could have happened.

A few anomalies, sure, but who knows what that means -- yet.

But I'm all ears. What is the exact evidence of wrong doing?