I believe abuse of authority while in the office of the presidency by both Bush and Obama should provide the basis to Constitutionally restrain or eliminate the use of executive orders.
"Executive Orders have two main functions: to modify how an executive branch department or agency does its job (rule change) or to modify existing law, if such authority has been granted to the President by Congress. Executive orders are not mentioned by the Constitution, but they have been around a long, long time. George Washington issued several Presidential Proclamations, which are similar to EO's (Proclamations are still issued today). EO's and Proclamations are not law, but they have the effect of statutes. A typical modern Proclamation might declare a day to be in someone's honor. Historically, they have had broader effect, such as the Emancipation Proclamation. A typical EO might instruct the government to do no business with a country we are at war with. Executive orders are subject to judicial review, and can be declared unconstitutional. Today, EO's and Proclamations are sequentially numbered. The average president issues 58 EO's a year. As of March 13, 1936, all EO's must be published in the Federal Register. The first to have been so published was #7316, by President Roosevelt."
The US has lost any so-called "moral authority" (not that such a thing ever actually existed) thanks to more and more blatant abuses.
That's why 97% of Home land Security funding is going to Jewish organisations.
We are being set up for another Bolshevik revolution. History repeating, lack of knowledge.....
"Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the nations and keep them in its service".
- Joseph Goebbels, The Creators of the World’s Misfortunes
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: