25 votes

Guns Across America Rally - January 19th - Second Amendment EVENT

Guns Across America Rally - January 19th - Second Amendment EVENT

Guns Across America is a Rally at each of the States Capitols!

http://www.facebook.com/events/144639815690301

Find your State Below and get active!

EVENT NOTIFICATION! - NEXT SATURDAY - FIRST GUN OWNERS RALLY FOR SECOND AMENDMENT AT STATE CAPITOLS AROUND UNITED STATES - MARK YOUR CALENDERS - PACK A LUNCH - TAKE A ENJOYABLE DRIVE IN YOUR STATE - MAKE A SHOW OF SUPPORT OF YOUR ESSENTIAL NATURAL RIGHT - THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. SEE LIST OF STATES ORGANIZING PAGES BELOW:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...

Spread the word! Copy this letter and list! Post it on your Facebook Page! Post Everywhere, Like, Link, Spread the Word!

UPDATE: Please Scroll To the Bottom of this message for your state. If you do not see an event page or fan page link, we are updating hourly. If you are an organizer and find information wrong let us know.

More information from the founder, Eric, is at the bottom of this message.

... Alabama
https://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaAlabama
http://www.facebook.com/events/438906599509546/

Alaska- NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Arizona
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaArizona

Arkansas
Email: speedracer50-50@hotmail.com

California
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaCalifornia

Colorado
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaColorado

Connecticut
https://www.facebook.com/GunControlMoreCrimeConnecticut

Delaware- NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Florida * This event is not at the state capitol, it is in Hernando County Florida, which is centrally located to accomadate more people.
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaFlorida

Georgia- https://www.facebook.com/pages/Guns-Across-America-Georgia/3...

Hawaii-
https://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaHawaii

Idaho-
https://www.facebook.com/events/394928650594524/

Illinois
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Illinois-guns-across-America/1...

Indiana
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaIndiana

Iowa
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Guns-Across-America-Iowa/41236...

Kansas- NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Kentucky
Email: JLF49@YAHOO.COM

Louisiana
http://www.facebook.com/events/469195706451419/

Maine- NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Maryland
https://www.facebook.com/MarylandersUnitedForGunRights
https://www.facebook.com/events/301340709987039/

Massachusetts
Email: Jjpyrcz@yahoo.com

Michigan
Email: R.HEBETS@YAHOO.COM AND ANDYW48015@GMAIL.COM

Minnesota
https://www.facebook.com/events/411813318894135/

Mississippi
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaMississippi

Missouri
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaMissouri

Montana
https://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaMontana

Nebraska- ORGANIZER FOUND.. WAITING FOR INFORMATION

Nevada
https://www.facebook.com/events/286534551468579/

New Hampshire
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Guns-Across-America-New-Hampsh...

New Jersey
Email: YVR6S.RP@GMAIL.COM

New Mexico
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Guns-Across-America-State-of-N...

New York
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaNewYork

North Carolina
https://www.facebook.com/events/288626627926024/?ref=ts&fref=ts

North Dakota-NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Ohio
https://www.facebook.com/events/495069110543321/

Oklahoma
Email: Eric@culleninvestigations.com

Oregon
http://m.facebook.com/events/123470411154839?__user=0

Pennsylvania
http://www.facebook.com/GunControlmoreCrimePennsylvania

Rhode Island
https://www.facebook.com/events/585751154783985/

South Carolina
http://www.facebook.com/events/535429366481852/
www.facebook.com/SouthCarolinaGunsAcrossAmerica

South Dakota-NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Tennessee- NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Texas
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaTexas
https://www.facebook.com/events/225425857592741/

Utah
http://www.facebook.com/events/553216701357535/

Vermont- https://www.facebook.com/events/490587887651152/

Virginia- NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Washington
http://www.facebook.com/events/528696253831789/

West Virginia
http://www.facebook.com/events/553515974658558/

Wisconsin
http://www.facebook.com/GunsAcrossAmericaWisconsin

Wyoming- NEEDING ORGANIZER PLEASE EMAIL: ERICREED22@GMAIL.COM FOR INFORMATION IF YOU WANT TO VOLUNTEER

Hello patriots, it's Eric from "Gun Control = More Crime" again. "Guns Across America" is going to take place Saturday, Jan. 19, 2013 at "high noon." This is going to be a peaceful picketing protest against ANY, AND ALL future gun legislation. This is our chance to reach out to our elected officials, and tell them NO NEW GUN LAWS! "Guns Across America" is being tailored to happen in every states capital city**, at their capital building. The theory behind doing this event on a Saturday, is most conservative gun owners work a typical Monday through Friday job. I'm hoping for a massive response by doing this on a weekend.

Mission Statement:
Guns Across America Events are committed to supporting the Right to Keep and Bear Arms as outlined in the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. Our goal is to inform and educate the public about their Constitutional Rights . Our objective is to ensure that law abiding citizens retain those rights through peaceful and legal means.

This is going to be a great success with your help. All you need to do is show up, and make your voice heard. If you're state has legalized open carry / concealed carry, and you're legal to do so, I encourage it. However, please make sure we're all in compliance with state laws, as this event will be a reflection on all gun owners across America. All details and updates will occur on the page, "Gun Control = More Crime." I look forward to making this a huge success, so please share this update.

**Some states are not gathering at their Capital City. Please check your States Facebook page/event page or ask your State Organizer for the proper location.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
meekandmild's picture

LAW OF THE LAND

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succintly stated as follows:
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. "
Marbury vs Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them quot;
Miranda vs Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no right; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed."
Norton vs Shelby County118 US 425 p.442
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, in in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."
16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177
late 2nd, Section 256

Which underscores this statement by James Madison as to Intent

-

Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:
In Full: http://www.pacificwestcom.com/americanpatriotpartynewsletter

James Madison: "....I cannot comprehend that the power of legislating over a "SMALL DISTRICT", which "CANNOT EXCEED" "TEN MILES SQUARE", and "MAY NOT BE MORE" than "ONE MILE", will involve the dangers which he (Patrick Henry) apprehends...."

(APP: Just THINK about that for a moment)

"...If there be any knowledge in my mind of the nature of man, I should think it would be the last thing that would enter into the mind of any man to grant exclusive advantages, in a "VERY CIRCUMSCRIBED DISTRICT", to the prejudice of the community at large. ..."

It appears that the federal government needs to be put back inside their "TEN SQUARE MILE BOX" as was the INTENT...

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

James Madison Quote - BUMP! - 25 to 1 Civilian Supremacy!

James Madison: "The highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does NOT EXCEED one hundredth part of the souls, or one twenty-fifth (1/25th) part of the number able to bear arms. This PORTION would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.

To "these" would be "OPPOSED" (APP: indicating that the "militia" is to be a "OPPOSING force" to the standing army as well as that of foreign enemies)

a MILITIA amounting to near half a million "CITIZENS" with arms in their HANDS, "officered by men chosen from "AMONG THEMSELVES", (NOT by government or the standing army - a solid restriction to the true definition of the term "MILITIA") fighting for "their" (the citizen / militia's) common liberties and united and conducted by government"S" (local) possessing their (the citizen / militia's) affections and confidence. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a "proportion" of regular troops (i.e. standing army). Besides the advantage of being armed, it forms a barrier against the "enterprises of ambition", more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

The governments of Europe are afraid to trust the people with arms. If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America did. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors."...

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

John Locke Quote - BUMP! Use of Force against Unjust Force.

John Locke 228. : "...MAY OPPOSE unlawful violence of - their magistrates (Government use of Force) when they INVADE their (THE PEOPLE'S) PROPERTIES, -, and that, therefore, this doctrine is not to be allowed, being 'so destructive to the "PEACE" of the world';

THEY MAY AS WELL SAY, upon the "SAME GROUND", that honest men may not oppose "ROBBERS or PIRATES", because this may occasion disorder or bloodshed.

IF any mischief come in "such cases", it is NOT to be charged upon him who "DEFENDS HIS OWN RIGHT", but "ON HIM" that "INVADES HIS NEIGHBOUR'S".

"If the innocent honest man must quietly quit all he has for "PEACE SAKE" to him who will lay violent hands upon it, I desire it may be considered "WHAT KIND OF PEACE" there will be in the world which consists only in violence and rapine, and which is to be maintained only for the benefit of "ROBBERS" and "OPPRESSORS".

Who would not think it an "admirable peace" betwixt the "MIGHTY AND THE MEAN", when the lamb, without resistance, yielded his throat to be torn by the imperious wolf?"

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

LIVE FREE OR DIE

free men own guns

slaves do not

what are we becoming?

http://shelfsufficient.com - My site on getting my little family prepped for whatever might come our way.

http://growing-elite-marijuana.com - My site on growing marijuana

NYers have been "Sacrificed"

...and are "collateral damage" in Little-Lord-Cuomo's bid to be a candidate for POTUS 2016.

NYS Senate Passes Gun Law.

http://www.dailypaul.com/270294/new-york-senate-approves-gun...

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

Let Them Know State Constitutions are Subject to Bill of Rights

Let Them Know...

Even STATE Constitutions are SUBJECT to the BILL OF RIGHTS!
i.e. RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is KNOWN AS THE "FIRST LAW OF NATURE".

Absolute Rights of the Colonists 1772:
In Full: http://www.pacificwestcom.com/oregonpatriotparty/Rights_of_t...

Samuel Adams:

"...1st. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men.--

Among the Natural Rights of the Colonists are these First. a Right to Life; Secondly to Liberty; thirdly to Property; together with the Right to support and defend them in the best manner they can--Those are evident Branches of, rather than deductions from the Duty of Self Preservation, commonly called "the first Law of Nature"--

All Men have a Right to remain in a State of Nature as long as they please: And in case of intollerable Oppression, Civil or Religious, to leave the Society they belong to, and enter into another.--

When Men enter into Society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions, And previous limitations as form an equitable "original compact".--

Every natural Right not expressly given up or from the nature of a Social Compact necessarily ceded remains.--

All positive and civil laws, should conform as far as possible, to the Law of natural reason and equity.-- ..."

Now Read This:

Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:
In FULL: http://www.pacificwestcom.com/americanpatriotpartynewsletter

George Nicholas: "...But the "COMMON LAW" is "NOT EXCLUDED". There is "NOTHING" in "that paper" (APP Note: referring to the US Constitution being considered) to warrant the assertion.

As to the exclusion of a jury from the vicinage, he has mistaken the fact. The legislature may direct a jury to come from the vicinage. But the gentleman says that, by this Constitution, they have power to make laws to define crimes and prescribe punishments; and that, consequently, we are not free from torture. Treason against the United States is defined in the Constitution, and the forfeiture limited to the life of the person attainted.

Congress have power to define and punish:

a.) piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and
b.) offenses against the laws of nations;

but they (APP: the federal government, legislature or supreme court) CANNOT DEFINE or PRESCRIBE the PUNISHMENT of "ANY OTHER CRIME WHATEVER", WITHOUT "VIOLATING the CONSTITUTION".

(APP Note: See this also in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions - Kentucky Resolutions #2 - This can be no clearer, the federal government and all those officials and citizens who support or allow others to be prosecuted under any "other crimes and punishments" not listed are in DIRECT VIOLATION to the Constitution they claim to uphold.)

If we had no security against torture but our declaration of rights, we might be tortured to-morrow; for it has been repeatedly infringed and disregarded. A bill of rights is only an acknowledgment of the "PREEXISTING CLAIM TO RIGHTS IN THE PEOPLE."

They BELONG TO US AS MUCH as if they had been inserted in the Constitution.

(APP Note: Which they eventually were)

But it is said that, if it be doubtful, the possibility of dispute ought to be precluded. Admitting it was proper for the Convention to have inserted a bill of rights, it is not proper here to propose it as the condition of our accession to the Union. Would you reject this government for its omission, dissolve the Union, and bring miseries on yourselves and posterity? I hope the gentleman does not oppose it on this ground solely. Is there another reason? He said that it is not only the general wish of this state, but all the states, to have a bill of rights. If it be so, where is the difficulty of having this done by way of subsequent amendment? We shall find the other states willing to accord with their own favorite wish.

The gentleman last up says that the power of legislation includes every thing. A general power of legislation does.

But this is a special power of legislation. Therefore, >>>"it does NOT contain that plenitude of power which he imagines".

They (The Federal government) "CANNOT LEGISLATE" in "ANY case" but those "PARTICULARLY ENUMERATED"...."

Pass the word, Re-Post, Get educated and Educate Others!

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

We know Freedom.

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

Samuel Adams Quote - BUMP!

Rights of the Colonists 1772:

"First, "The first fundamental positive law - establishing the legislative power; as the first fundamental natural/law also, - to govern even the legislative power itself, is the preservation of the Society. "6 "

Secondly, The Legislative has NO RIGHT to absolute arbitrary power over the lives and fortunes of the people:..." "

Thirdly, The supreme power "CANNOT" Justly take from ANY man, "ANY PART" of his "PROPERTY" without his "CONSENT", in person >>>OR by his REPRESENTATIVE."

These are some of the FIRST PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL LAW AND JUSTICE, and the "GREAT BARRIERS" OF "ALL FREE STATES", and of the British Constitution in particular. It is utterly irreconcileable to these principles, and to many other fundamental maxims of the common law, common sense and reason, that a British house of commons, should have a right, at pleasure, to give and grant the property of the Colonists."

i.e. Put in Modern Time: "...It is utterly irreconcileable to these principles, and to many other fundamental maxims of the common law, common sense and reason, that a United States Legislature, should have a right, at pleasure, to give and grant the property of the Free Citizens of the Independent States.

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

George Nicholas and Thomas Jefferson Quote - Bump!

Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:

George Nicholas: "...He then proceeded thus: But, says he, who is to determine the extent of such (federal) powers? I say, the same power which, in ALL well-regulated communities, determines the "EXTENT" of "legislative" powers. If they EXCEED these powers, the "JUDICIARY" "WILL" declare it "VOID", or else "the PEOPLE" will have a "RIGHT" to declare it "VOID".

Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 in full:
http://www.pacificwestcom.com/americanpatriotpartynewsletter

Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson:

Kentucky Resolution: #8: "...BUT, where powers are assumed which have NOT BEEN DELEGATED (to the federal government), a "NULLIFICATION" of the act is the RIGHTFUL REMEDY: that every STATE has a natural RIGHT in cases NOT within the COMPACT, (casus non fœderis) to "NULLIFY" of their "OWN AUTHORITY" all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them:

that nevertheless, this commonwealth, from motives of regard and respect for its co States, has wished to communicate with them on the subject: that with them alone it is proper to communicate, they alone being parties to the COMPACT, and solely authorized to judge in the last resort of the powers exercised under it,

Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions in Full:
http://www.pacificwestcom.com/candidates

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

George Washington Quote - Bump!

George Washington January 7, 1790 :

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence. From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable.

The very atmosphere of firearms "EVERYWHERE" restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's GOOD."

American Patriot Party.CC - Get Educated.
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

This Quote is BOGUS!

As a firearms owner and 2A activist please stop using it. It hurts the movement.

http://www.guncite.com/gc2ndbog.html

However guncite.com has some AWESOME quotes for ya'll.

http://www.guncite.com/gc2ndfqu.html

"Liberty's too precious a thing to be buried in books...Men should hold it up in front of them every single day of their lives and say: 'I'm free to think and to speak. My ancestors couldn't. I can. And my children will."

-Jimmy Stewart

Note that this Quote was reported in 1790 & NOT varifably Bogus

Sometimes purported to have been made in an "Address to the Second Session of the First United States Congress, 7 January 1790, according to the Boston Independent Chronicle (14 January 1790)",

In other words, there is a record of it being said in the Boston Independent Chronicle in 1790.

Who are you going to believe, someone who cannot find the quote in their local library or using ESP in 2013?

Or someone who was there and wrote it down in 1790.

Note and warning that WIKIPEDIA is ran by European socialists who are trying to rewrite history and do all they can to downplay the principles of our liberties by calling them Questionable or Bogus.

Instead, lets find the Boston Independent Chronicle (14 January 1790) and simply POST IT.

A copy of George Washington's Speech indicates that the idea is correct if not the word:

"...Providence has placed within our reach, will in the course of the present important session, call for the cool and deliberate exertion of your patriotism, firmness and wisdom.

Among the many interesting objects which will engage your attention, that of providing for the common defence will merit particular regard. To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

"A FREE PEOPLE ought NOT ONLY to be ARMED but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And THEIR SAFETY and interest REQUIRE that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them INDEPENDENT on others, for essential, particularly for military supplies.

The proper establishment of the troops which may be deemed indispensable, will be entitled to mature consideration. In the arrangement which will be made respecting it, it will be of importance to conciliate the comfortable support of the officers and soldiers with a due regard to economy. "

Now who at that time were the MILITIA?

Here is George Mason 6-16-1788:

Mr. GEORGE MASON. Mr. Chairman, a worthy member has asked WHO are the MILITIA, if they be not THE PEOPLE of this country, and if we are not to be protected from the fate of the Germans, Prussians, by our representation? I ask, Who are the militia? They consist now of the "whole people", except a few public officers..."

That says "FIREARMS EVERYWHERE" to me.

And if there is any question:

James Madison: "The highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does NOT EXCEED one hundredth part of the souls, or one twenty-fifth (1/25th) part of the number able to bear arms. This PORTION would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.

To "these" would be "OPPOSED" (APP: indicating that the "militia" is to be a "OPPOSING force" to the standing army as well as that of foreign enemies)

a MILITIA amounting to near half a million "CITIZENS" with arms in their HANDS, "officered by men chosen from "AMONG THEMSELVES", (NOT by government or the standing army - a solid restriction to the true definition of the term "MILITIA") fighting for "their" (the citizen / militia's) common liberties and united and conducted by government"S" (local) possessing their (the citizen / militia's) affections and confidence. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a "proportion" of regular troops (i.e. standing army). Besides the advantage of being armed, it forms a barrier against the "enterprises of ambition", more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

The governments of Europe are afraid to trust the people with arms. If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America did. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors."...

Sounds like "FIREARMS EVERYWHERE" to me.

American Patriot Party.CC

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

Thomas Jefferson Quote - BUMP!

"On every question of construction (of the Constitution) let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." (Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322)

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

Thomas Jefferson Quote - Bump!

Thomas Jefferson; "...We established however some, although not all, its [self-government] important principles. The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent, (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their RIGHT and DUTY to be at ALL TIMES ARMED…” (Thomas Jefferson to John Cartwright, 1824. Memorial Edition 16:45, Lipscomb and Bergh, editors)

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

Thomas Jefferson Quote - Bump!

Thomas Jefferson - Kentucky Resolution 1798:

"...WHENSOEVER the general (FEDERAL) government assumes UNDELEGATED powers, its acts are "UNAUTHORITATIVE", "VOID", and of "NO FORCE":that to this compact "each State" acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party:

that the government created by this COMPACT was "NOT" made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself (Fed. Supreme Court, Executive, Legislative are not final judge); since that would have made "its discretion", and "not the Constitution", the measure of its powers;

but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (state) has an EQUAL right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress."

American Patriot Party.CC - Get Educated.
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

Founders Quote - Bump!

James Madison - Author of the Constitution - Virginia Resolution 1798:

"...That this state having by its Convention, which ratified the federal Constitution, expressly declared, that "AMONG OTHER ESSENTIAL RIGHTS", "the Liberty of Conscience and of the Press "CANNOT BE CANCELED", abridged, restrained, OR MODIFIED by "ANY AUTHORITY" of the "United States" (federal government),"

(APP: This includes Executive Orders (which in itself is unconstitutional), Legislative or Supreme Court)

"...and from its extreme anxiety to guard these rights from EVERY possible attack of "SOPHISTRY or AMBITION", having with other states, recommended an amendment for that purpose, which amendment was, in due time, ANNEXED to the Constitution; it would mark a "REPROACHABLE" inconsistency, and "CRIMINAL DEGENERACY", if an indifference were now shewn, to the most palpable violation of ONE OF THE RIGHTS, thus declared and secured; and to the establishment of a PRECEDENT (UNDER A PRETENSE OF AUTHORITY) which may be FATAL TO THE OTHER (RIGHTS)...."

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

John Locke - 222 - Lesson - EXECUTIVE DESIGN TO ENSLAVE - BUMP!

John Locke 222:

"...whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a "STATE OF WAR" with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence.

Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption, endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, -

What I have said here concerning the legislative in general holds true also concerning the supreme executor,who having a double trust put in him, both to have a part in the legislative and the supreme execution of the law, acts against both, when he goes about to set up his own arbitrary will as the law of the society. He acts also contrary to his trust when he employs the force, treasure, and offices of the society to corrupt the representatives and gain them to his purposes, when he openly pre-engages the electors, and prescribes, to their choice, such whom he has, by solicitation, threats, promises, or otherwise, won to his "designs", and employs them to bring in such who have promised beforehand what to vote and what to enact. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new model the ways of election, what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security?

To prepare such an assembly as this, and endeavour to set up the declared abettors of his own will, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, is certainly as great a breach of trust, and as perfect a declaration of a "design" to subvert the government, as is possible to be met with.

To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the same end, and all the arts of perverted law made use of to take off and destroy all that stand in the way of such a >>"design", and will not comply and consent to betray the liberties of their country,

it will be past doubt what is doing.

What power they ought to have in the society who thus employ it "CONTRARY TO THE TRUST" that along with it in its >>>>"FIRST institution" (i.e. ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT", is EASY to determine;

and one cannot but see that he who has once attempted any such thing as this "CANNOT ANY LONGER BE TRUSTED..."

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.