Second Amendment Explained with Stick Figures
Submitted by fishyculture on Mon, 01/14/2013 - 16:00»
- Login to post comments
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here



Zazzle t-shirt
I have a Zazzle account and will gladly make up a t-shirt. Can you provide a larger graphic with more resolution? Zazzle will only let me enlarge this to a certain degree, and I would like to make it bigger. If the graphic has more pixels I can enlarge the image on the t-shirt more. If you come up with a bigger image with more resolution, you can reply to this comment and I will do the shirt on Zazzle.
--Paula
Thanks Fishy
Shared on Twitter.
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
My website: http://www.libertypoet.com/
STAND WITH RAND 2016
Simple and speaks volumes
Deserves a bump.
Approach to the Anti - Violent
I see nothing wrong in wanting a gun-free world as long as everyone agrees that it needs to be violence-free, first.
So as long as the goal is peace and harmony, we ought to be able to work together, as most sane people want peace, including Miss Congeniality.
The discussion should be about what to do in the meantime, including whether or not little old ladies and paraplegics should be limited to using baseball bats when attacked by linebackers on steroids, or whether it is more fair to let people have guns until linebackers on steroids no longer lose their tempers.
Same with dictators on steroids. Until dictators are no longer a danger to society, we ought to remain able to defend ourselves and others to prevent genocides, etc. Maybe we ought to arm small nations with nuclear weapons, as well, as the same principle applies.
What do you think? http://consequeries.com/
Peace is no Excuse - John Locke #228
John Locke:
In Full: http://www.pacificwestcom.com/oregonpatriotparty/Locke_Civil...
#228: "...MAY OPPOSE unlawful violence of - their magistrates (Government use of Force) when they INVADE their (THE PEOPLE'S) PROPERTIES, -, and that, therefore, this doctrine is not to be allowed, being 'so destructive to the "PEACE" of the world';
THEY MAY AS WELL SAY, upon the "SAME GROUND", that honest men may not oppose "ROBBERS or PIRATES", because this may occasion disorder or bloodshed.
IF any mischief come in "such cases", it is NOT to be charged upon him who "DEFENDS HIS OWN RIGHT", but "ON HIM" that "INVADES HIS NEIGHBOUR'S".
"If the innocent honest man must quietly quit all he has for "PEACE SAKE" to him who will lay violent hands upon it, I desire it may be considered "WHAT KIND OF PEACE" there will be in the world which consists only in violence and rapine, and which is to be maintained only for the benefit of "ROBBERS" and "OPPRESSORS".
Who would not think it an "admirable peace" betwixt the "MIGHTY AND THE MEAN", when the lamb, without resistance, yielded his throat to be torn by the imperious wolf?"
American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc
http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...
RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC
John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.
2nd Amemdment NOT!
Basing anyone's right to own a gun on the 2nd Amendment is falling into a trap.
If it is agreed that a piece of paper can give or assure my "rights" then it would follow that changing that piece of paper could take away my inalienable rights.
Gun rights are inalienable rights, and no one has the legitimate authority to take them away.
This is hilarious
But I guarantee some on the left would try to argue.
Those unarmed good guys sure
Those unarmed good guys sure don't look too happy.
Please read my new COMIC STRIP on Tumblr.
Also, you're welcome to follow me on Twitter.
The problem
The people who are for gun restrictions seem to believe that new laws will make all these horrible guns magically evaporate so that the bad guys don't have them either.
That's Good... Now get out to your State Capitols Saturday!
Guns Across America - EVENT
http://www.dailypaul.com/270130/guns-across-america-rally-january-19th-second-amendment-event'
And Make Laws Like THIS:
http://www.dailypaul.com/270164/feds-arrested-if-they-do-not...
So your Sheriff will do THIS:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...
Scroll Down To Kentucky Sheriff Story... No Gun Control in My County!
RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC
John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.
Bump
.
I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
Good Call
This might work on my liberal friends who are having a harder time understanding these things.
jrd is still here... kinda in a weird sort of way. She also just might be the happiest girl in the world because she got exactly what she wanted which was a perfect summer wandering playlist.
Ha ha ha
About as simple as it gets.