Can somebody with a zazzle account put this on a t-shirt?
I have a Zazzle account and will gladly make up a t-shirt. Can you provide a larger graphic with more resolution? Zazzle will only let me enlarge this to a certain degree, and I would like to make it bigger. If the graphic has more pixels I can enlarge the image on the t-shirt more. If you come up with a bigger image with more resolution, you can reply to this comment and I will do the shirt on Zazzle.
Shared on Twitter.
LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15
Deserves a bump.
I see nothing wrong in wanting a gun-free world as long as everyone agrees that it needs to be violence-free, first.
So as long as the goal is peace and harmony, we ought to be able to work together, as most sane people want peace, including Miss Congeniality.
The discussion should be about what to do in the meantime, including whether or not little old ladies and paraplegics should be limited to using baseball bats when attacked by linebackers on steroids, or whether it is more fair to let people have guns until linebackers on steroids no longer lose their tempers.
Same with dictators on steroids. Until dictators are no longer a danger to society, we ought to remain able to defend ourselves and others to prevent genocides, etc. Maybe we ought to arm small nations with nuclear weapons, as well, as the same principle applies.
What do you think? http://consequeries.com/
In Full: http://www.pacificwestcom.com/oregonpatriotparty/Locke_Civil...
#228: "...MAY OPPOSE unlawful violence of - their magistrates (Government use of Force) when they INVADE their (THE PEOPLE'S) PROPERTIES, -, and that, therefore, this doctrine is not to be allowed, being 'so destructive to the "PEACE" of the world';
THEY MAY AS WELL SAY, upon the "SAME GROUND", that honest men may not oppose "ROBBERS or PIRATES", because this may occasion disorder or bloodshed.
IF any mischief come in "such cases", it is NOT to be charged upon him who "DEFENDS HIS OWN RIGHT", but "ON HIM" that "INVADES HIS NEIGHBOUR'S".
"If the innocent honest man must quietly quit all he has for "PEACE SAKE" to him who will lay violent hands upon it, I desire it may be considered "WHAT KIND OF PEACE" there will be in the world which consists only in violence and rapine, and which is to be maintained only for the benefit of "ROBBERS" and "OPPRESSORS".
Who would not think it an "admirable peace" betwixt the "MIGHTY AND THE MEAN", when the lamb, without resistance, yielded his throat to be torn by the imperious wolf?"
American Patriot Party.CC
RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC
John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.
Basing anyone's right to own a gun on the 2nd Amendment is falling into a trap.
If it is agreed that a piece of paper can give or assure my "rights" then it would follow that changing that piece of paper could take away my inalienable rights.
Gun rights are inalienable rights, and no one has the legitimate authority to take them away.
But I guarantee some on the left would try to argue.
Those unarmed good guys sure don't look too happy.
The people who are for gun restrictions seem to believe that new laws will make all these horrible guns magically evaporate so that the bad guys don't have them either.
Guns Across America - EVENT
And Make Laws Like THIS:
So your Sheriff will do THIS:
Scroll Down To Kentucky Sheriff Story... No Gun Control in My County!
I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)
This might work on my liberal friends who are having a harder time understanding these things.
About as simple as it gets.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: