10 votes

Mark Levin: If Obama unilaterally increases the debit limit, he will be IMPEACHED and removed from office.

Rand Paul had earlier hinted at the same thing.

If anybody has the clip send me the link.

UPDATE - Texas Congressman also threatens impeachment on Obama if he uses EO on any gun matter.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/14/gop-congressman-threatens-...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Mark Levin

should be impeached and removed from the airwaves...along with several others.

Whatever

Bill Clinton was impeached, yet he was not removed from office. Insiders would never go beyond wagging their fingers at the president, because they don't want the same to happen to them or "their guy" in the future.

downvoted...

just because a quote from this douche never deserves a thumbs up on the Daily Paul

lol

Oh I laughed so friggin hard at this. Thank you. Levin is quite an insufferable person.

But the news is welcome regardless for me. I'm a little excited at the prospect of getting Obama impeached not long before or after his inauguration and preferably before agenda 21 rears its ugly head.

Homeland security statement: patriotism is now considered terrorism.
I love www.isidewith.com shared it with everyone I know. If anything they realize its not just a red and blue idiot running for reelection.

By the way, Mark Levin is a liar.

He knows Obama is king now and does not answer to congress.

Yet Mark Levin pretends that Obama is under some authority to appease the idiots who listen to him.

.

.

I wrote Ron Paul only one time.
In 2005, as a constituent- I wrote and asked him why he did not sign on to DK letter of impeachment for duh bya.
Paul wrote back and said the "speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi, has taken this issue off the table".

Boehner will NEVER put osamas impeachment on the table.

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

any reason

Any reasons besides boner being establishment/bankster or that pretty much sum it up?

Homeland security statement: patriotism is now considered terrorism.
I love www.isidewith.com shared it with everyone I know. If anything they realize its not just a red and blue idiot running for reelection.

.

This was all decided way back when boner played golf with his high-ness.
Probably a "if I go down, you go down with me" type thing between them.
They are not afraid of the American People.
If I were them, I would be.

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

Long live the king.

.

The important question should

The important question should be: Whence comes this power? Could it be through years and years of usurpation that has gone unobstructed and acquiesced in by people who have now a stake in the matter? I’m glad people are concerned; it’s a shame, however, that lessons of history are neglected until it reaches a crescendo. I point this out to remind those that executive aggrandizement is not something that just happens. It’s built up, piece by piece, by artful charlatans and political demagogues, especially in times of “crisis,” and, of course, with the compliance of a servile citizenry.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I hate equality. - John Randolph of Roanoke

Impeached by whom??

It's my observation that 90% of Congress is on the bankster take.

Lol yeah right. Obama could

Lol yeah right. Obama could rape the Queen on live TV and everyone would cheer. He'll never be impeached.

you don't get it

the Senate has no say in the impeachment, it's all house, the Senate puts on the trial.

When you mess with guns in America you awake a sleeping giant that even Obama can't overcome.

If That Were True...

...and it is demonstrably not, then we would have none of the plethora of infringements that we have.

Fact.

Impeached for raising the debt limit?

What about for his gross violations of the constitution? Illegal wars, curtailment of free speech, and soon enough an attempt at gun control.

it always comes down to money my brother

The problem with all the other things you point out, is congress helped him with those, this would be a direct violation of the Constitution on his own.

It is because of Idiots like

It is because of Idiots like Levin that Obama is in office. If he would have fought for Ron Paul he wouldn't have to worry about it because Ron would have beat Obama 60 to 40%.

I don't disagree

but you don't kill the message because of the messenger. Ron Paul's own campaign manager screwed him far more than anyone else ever.

Obama will never be

Obama will never be impeached.

Levin is a NeoCon Douche

And he is more than likely wrong here too. Fatmouthed peckerhead. Senate has to confirm his impeachment, and that my friends in Liberty, will never happen.

And don't count on the R's getting control of the Senate any time soon with the internal mess they have on their hands. Not that I give them any credence to get anything done. The only impeaching they can do was over the definition of "is" and what a waste of time and money that was.

Ammunition -- 9mm - 40s&w - 45acp - .223/5.56x45 -- www.ammopit.com
Bulk Components starting this month also with 223 bullets!

Onthe contrary

it took almost a year from Nixon's I'm not a crook statement until his resignation. This wouldn't be tomorrow, a huge majority of Democrats coming up for re-election just about the same time as an impeachment trial. I think there would be some real possibility of it happening, and I think Dems up for re-election would be in trouble and probably already are with all the talk of banning guns. Already seeing Senate Democrats saying no way to any gun ban.

I hope you're right

but forgive me if I don't hold any positive comfort in regards to Obama ever being impeached. There are enough things for that to happen now.

I think the gun ban has little chance to pass in congress, but I hold no such thoughts about whether Obama thinks it's his right at 'King' to do so.

Ammunition -- 9mm - 40s&w - 45acp - .223/5.56x45 -- www.ammopit.com
Bulk Components starting this month also with 223 bullets!

Any senator voting to impeach The One will be unceremoniously

disappeared.

=======
RON PAUL 2012

geez people learn how the system works

Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeaching, while the United States Senate has the sole power to try all impeachments. The removal of impeached officials is automatic upon conviction in the Senate. In Nixon v. United States (1993), the Supreme Court determined that the federal judiciary.

The Senate does not have a vote to impeach, the Senate holds the trial, at points even members of the house come in to act as prosecutors. The President would be on trial, it would be televised by every channel. If the President is caught lying under oath, he is done as well, Thats what got Nixon.

B******T

Almost no way this will happen. The house may well impeach him but then the Senate must try him and find him guilty. No way the heavily Democratic Senate votes to remove him from office, or punish him in any way for that matter. Clinton was impeached by the house and found not guilty by the Senate. The Senate might vote to remove him from office but we must make the assumption that the majority of the people will know the Constitutional basis for the impeachment and call their Senator to demand his removal. I would say the odds of this happening will be about 1,000,000 to 1.

I'm going say a great chance

It would take a bit to impeach the President over a year. A huge amount of Senators are up for re-election, they begin campaigning this August. If timed correctly, those Senators would be gone.

I hope I am wrong

but I don't think there are enough brave elected officials that will risk their potential political gains and futures to protect the American people or the Constitution on a national stage.

"The more you sweat in training, the less you bleed in battle."