May I remind you Levin HATES Ron Paul and did everything he could to sabotage his campaign.
On about 90% of everything. The anarchists here are with Paul on about 60%. Levin is more Paul than the anarchists.
I hate Levin. He's never had a nice thing to say about Ron Paul or anyone that supported him. All of a sudden "we're losing the Constitution" and "the debt matters". Why didn't he join us then for the last eight years? I'll tell you why, he's a phony wannabe
Live Free or Die Trying
You have to listen to this youtube that a radio station that fires this Pos
Not by the man.
Even idiots can say things that are true.
allegory - ˈalɪg(ə)ri/ - noun - 1. a story, poem, or picture which can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one.
and consistency. Levin changes the way the wind is blowing to remain relevant.
Why is this man even here? He stated so much negative crap about Dr. Paul that was not true and he is a war monger. I really dislike the way he treats people, even when they agree with him. Can't stand the man. Sorry.
Knowledge is the currency of the Universe.-
Giorgio A. Tsoukalos
just thought i'd state the obvious.
George W. faced the same articles of impeachment, 35 to be exact. Oh, that's right, G.W. was a GOP Neocon/tyrannist, not a DEM Socialist/tyrannist. If it's partisan , it's crap! As evidence that it's being broadcast in print and on TV. If it's bi-partisan, hold on for dear life, you're about to be blindsided.
Take this crap off the front page. There's nothing here folks 'cept the same old song and dance: MSM only reports the Professional Wrestling Matches. The DISAGREEMENTS. Not the drinks afterwards, behind the song and dance, where they agree...where the real fleecing takes place.
What are they doing behind the scenes of this tired old wrestling match I thought we all saw through? What are they AGREEING on? I dunno, maybe this, raising gasoline taxes by 250%? For starters? Where the govt gets to decide how many miles your registered vehicle gets on a gallon of gas? http://washingtonexaminer.com/new-pay-per-mile-scheme-would-...
P.S. Doesn't it nauseate anyone that Levin says he's he one who first noticed this tyrannical govt then everyone else noticed, "caught on"? What? Like Ron Paul didn't exist!? What a crock.
"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina
is a SCOURGE on the World Wrestling Federation! I'm going to beat him to a PULP! (After we go out to dinner of course) Let me know if you think this is an off-topic comment.
OHHH waitaminute check this out...
Conservative talk radio host, lawyer[not a lawyer of course but an ATTORNEY and BAR member], and frequent National Review contributor Mark R. Levin comes out firing against the United States Supreme Court in Men in ...
Anyone starting to notice a common denominator?
They are entertaining the SHEEPLE... it's a SHOW... you think it's REAL. It's not real... this discourse is COMPLETELY FAKE... hello... hello... did you just hang up on me?
How many non-BAR members in congress... 1... maybe 2?
Visit the Mission Command Center & Join Our Ranks!
Mark Levin hates Ron Paul and his supporters, all these phony "freedom loving" media puppets need to go.
Who can listen to that guy?
I would bet he nags his wife :P
Savage is definitely better between these two.
This whole thing frustrates me so much. But what frustrates me the most is when poeple try to use logic (people, media, congress, president - even the god for saken Supreme Court said it)that all of this is justified because the poeple voted these poeple in.
Except -as we all know here on the DP and it is unreputable. THEY CHEATED THE ELECTION!! This group of politicians is not (necessarily) who the people voted for. This fraud did not start and stop with RP. it goes all the way to the top and to the end of the race. RP was cheated out of the nomination. No doubt. but Romney was cheated out of the election (unless he was placed there on purpose for Obama to win - which may very well be). We all knew that the winner of the presidency wasn't going to be who got more votes from the people. It was going to be who had more cheating power.
So please please please stop saying that this is all justified in the end because it is who the poeple voted for and so they are getting what is coming to them. No one is getting what is coming to them, because the the majority of the poeple didn't ask for this. Romney knew he wouldn't get the nomination on his own, he had to cheat to know for sure he would get it. And Obama knew for sure he would not get election by the majority of the people after his 1st 4 years, so he cheated the election too.
If every official won solely through cheating, then there would be no point in trying to change the system. The fact is that cheating is not the dominant reason for electoral victory. I've spent the past ten years talking to thousands of people in PA, NJ, and NYC and most do not select their candidates based on the Constitution. Even if cheating were widespread, the people do not care. They are not doing anything about it. It is not justified by our standards, but mob control dominates the electoral process. And this is what the people want.
The way to fix it is to change the people. You cannot fix it by complaining about corruption and saying that there is no hope.
Supporting a Needed Tool for Government Feedback:
A Citizen-Operated Legal System.
Mark Levin is doing exactly what the President wants. Obama wants foes to exhibit outrage and then feel better after losing. This started with health care and there is no more outrage today. It will occur with guns. And the final takeover of America.
In terms of impeachment, the Republican Congress might pass it, but the Democrat Senate will not convict. It would strengthen Obama because, after he wins, he would say that he could do anything that he wants more than ever. He would say that he was absolved and the decision was made by representatives that were duly elected by Americans.
The fact is that the voting majority does not care about the Constitution. If they did, they would not have allowed Obama to be re-elected. They would not have allowed Romney to win the nomination. Third parties would have gotten a higher percentage of votes. They would not have elected a Senate that never heard of the Constitution. This is a basic problem with human nature - short term gains at the expense of long term investment.
Of course, we need to keep the debate open and engage. But the battle against socialism does not look promising.
It's NOT REAL.... they are all ACTORS!
Levin is correct, but I can’t trust his sincerity. He would have to attack the Imperial Presidency itself, rather than its current holder, and this he can’t do since he supports one of its most important features: unilateral action with regards to war and national security. The debate is partisan and over the degree of Caesarism: for how can one advocate a practically unrestrained president regarding war powers and its attendant massive security state and be surprised that this Leviathan just won’t listen when it usurps more power in domestic affairs? He forgets that power accumulates. He forgets that giving power to a president that one favors does not disappear once out of office.
Incidentally, has anyone else noticed the game plan these “conservatives” have been playing? Ever since Obama was elected the tone has been this: Everything before Obama was, on the whole, pretty good, with a few exceptions, then Obama came into office and just made a big mess.
malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium
I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I hate equality. - John Randolph of Roanoke
He would have to attack the Imperial Presidency itself, rather than its current holder, and this he can’t do since he supports one of its most important features: unilateral action with regards to war and national security.
Precisely. If Obama were doing a better job of killing Muslims then Levin would be perfectly happy with his power over Congress and the rest of the federal government.
Also notice that Levin isn't upset with Obama being able to assassinate US citizens or detain anyone indefinitely without trial. His "liberty" is very different from ours.
Obama is not Mary Levin's kind of dictator
YOU HELPED OBAMA GET ELECTED LEVIN!
Going to war without congress declaring. Oh forgot, you like to pick and choose which laws to follow.
YOU COULD HAVE HAD RON PAUL IF YOU SUPPORTED HIM!!!
Radio talk show host Mark Levin says he couldn't vote for Texas Rep. Ron Paul in the general election even if the Texas congressman were to somehow win the Republican nomination.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/16/mark-levin-ron-pauls-inter...
Love Liberty, be Vigilant
"Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty" (2 Corinthians 3:17)
Faith in God will prevail all things!
Some people seem to forget mark is a person with an opinion. Not a politician. Take it or leave
WRONG again!! They are agents for the propaganda wing of the Politburo
And so is HOLLYWOOD. PROPAGANDA POLITBURO PROVOCATEURS
That was radio talk show star Mark Levin.
Really? Radio talk show star?
STARS in radio?
Wonderful. Way to introduce collectivization on mass scale. And so the feuds begin.
*shakes head side to side* *sighs*
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me
Study nature, not books. -Walton Forest Dutton, MD, in his 1916 book whose subject is origin (therefore what all healing methods involve and count on), simple and powerful.
when Ron Paul is no longer in the picture. They are now for the Constitution and they see tyranny clearly. Too late, Mark Levin. Although Romney's brand of tyranny would have been more to Levin's liking, it would still have been tyranny.
...that it's not HIS Republican imperial president in office.
What you have done with this site is fantastic. I listen to Ernest Hancock, who I met at the Iowa straw poll in August of 2007, and I bought a shit load of your dime cards. LOL
And it was some time after dailypaul got started that I figured out why your financial blog disappeared! I can't remember many of the sites I used to frequent before Ron Paul began his exploratory bid for president in 2007.
Could you at least tell me the name of the old site. It bugs the hell out of me that I can't remember it.
I used to run:
Bull! Not bull. The archive is still up at. www.bullnotbull.com
And before that I ran Depression2.tv. "The second great depression will not be televised." That archive is off the web for now, as I've been toying with the idea of firing back up again. The second great depression has been in suspended animation for the past ten years or so, but I think it might be time for the revival.
But running a website is a big job. Nice to know that there are people here from way back when. Thanks man.
I can't stand listening to Mark Levin so I won't watch the video. However I listened to Mark Levin enough to know I can't stand him back when GWB was still in office. An imperial president is exactly what he wanted as I recall.
The last thing Levin wants is freedom IMO. As far as I can tell he just wants his 'team' in charge.
and back when I did, he used to spend hours on end defending the unitary executive. I doubt for a second that he changed his mind on Presidential power- esp. when power is grabbed for any "national security" purpose. Levin just disagrees with how Obama is using that power. That's why we oppose these powers across the board, Levin!
Perhaps if conservative talkers had given a damn about the overreach of the Bush/Cheney cabal, Obama and the Dems would think twice. But I fear that Obama/the left is governing as if they'll never again lose power in a general election. They're openly calling to flush the Constitution, end Presidential term limits, etc.
Visit https://soundcloud.com/politics-of-freedom for all recent Ron Paul interviews, speeches, debates, forums, panels, press conferences, news coverage, and Texas Straight Talk updates!
"Terrorism is the war of the poor, while war is the terrorism of
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: