7 votes

An Appeal To Stewart Rhodes, Oathkeeper

Mr. Rhodes -
Would you be willing to offer to set up a legal team ready to defend anyone who peacefully turns in their weapon and then fights to the Supreme Court to get it back, and overturn the ban?
It is pre-emptive, but I honestly believe that they will stage a false flag and / or get people suckered into a gun battle to further justify their grab. Whoever they go after first might feel less like a cornered animal if they knew ahead of time that they had people ready to take this battle on in the courts. If the first case were taken to the Supreme Court and overturned the entire ban, they could prove to be a far more valuable tool for the second amendment by going ahead and surrendering peacefully than by being drawn into a bloodbath.
I post this here so that ANY attorney that might be at the DP could run with it, even if Mr. Rhodes is not interested.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You seem to be under the false impression that an act of

disarmament is a "peaceful" act. It is not. It is an act of War.

If you find yourself in a state of war, declared and recognized by Congress or not, your only choices are:

A) Die.

B) Fight and maybe, but most likely die.

Notice there is only one option with a chance of survival or of having any meaning to that survival, or of having any meaning or purpose to your death.

Even if you die fighting, your resistance WILL in at least some small way, weaken the enemy and toughen the resolve of those still alive to fight.

If they come to disarm you, or arrest you for being armed, the time for peace has already passed.

An act of disarmament is a violent act. No matter the trappings of "civility" it is cloaked in. There is nothing civil about rendering people defenseless in the face of tyranny.

deacon's picture

I will not turn them in

nor go to jail peacefully,or otherwise
if someone shows up for confiscation
they have identified themselves as the enemy,
this is how they see us as we speak
they could set that up now and represent the ones
behind bars already
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

ditto...

...

3rd

.

So which is it..

Peacefully turn in your guns or REFUSE to turn them in..

Don't know about the rest here but they aren't taking my guns and I'm not gonna give them up peacefully.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

If they come for you FIRST, please reconsider

Refuse to turn in your guns, but peacefully turn yourself in.
Whoever they come for FIRST will be our LAST chance for peaceful resolution.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

If they are trying to disarm you, the last chance for peaceful

resolution has already passed.

Disarmament IS a violent and very uncivil act.

The line is about to be crossed

If that happens, there is no chance for peace till it's reversed or this administration and those that supported the gun ban are removed, by whatever means possible.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

jrd3820's picture

.

I always know exactly what you are going to say in these threads. Consistency is admirable.

I hope you and many others that look at things that way,

towards others as well, feel that way in the months to come.

That's about all I want to say on that, except to say, thank you.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

Yep

Albeit that principled stance is an alien concept, to most.

Even though I always believed

it was inevitable, I hoped they wouldn't try it.. I had hoped that we could make enough of a difference before the hammer came down hard so that we could turn this around before it got to this point but nope, I guess not.

I still hold out hope that it will be crushed outright but I have doubts that are seeded deeply. I think he wants this... I think he is intentionally putting our backs against the wall because he thinks that we are damned one way or another..

Lash out and we are branded and he gets to tighten the rope more..

Do nothing and we lose any real ability in this corrupt system to make a change.

I've never been a person which balls up in the fetal position when cornered and I suspect that many Patriots are no different.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

This is a great idea!

bump.

It may be out of scope for Oathkeepers though. I don't know

What about the United States Justice Foundation or Mountain States Legal Foundation or what's the one that Tom Fitton heads up? I forget. It's more along their lines.

Yes GREAT IDEA!

Let's ask the SLAVE traders to defend our rights! Yes let's do that!

Newsflash: Stewart Rhodes is a BAR member. When he goes on video and disavows all connections to that COMMUNIST organization maybe I'll think about caring about him instead of wanting to puke every time I see him pay lip service to the constitution while he gathers up a list of the resistors.

WAKE UP! Sorry fishy... this is the first post of yours I've ever down-voted. I don't compromise when it comes to the constitution.

http://www.dailypaul.com/269892/our-justice-system-has-been-...

vince

Ideally it would be a partnership between folks like you and the tiny handful of attorneys like Rhodes. Having an attorney or two on a team opens doors, but they would have to be willing to fight the REAL fight, meaning take guidance from people like you.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

Attorneys (Bar Members)

have no vested interest in defending rights. You at least know me as a guy who does extensive research. I leave no stone unturned.

Hear me now: This guy's job is to collect up a list of the resistors. Same with Alex Jones. People knock me for not putting my mug up on youtube... THINK about IF what I'm saying is true... don't you think I'm risking my life enough just typing these comments trying to get people to focus on the BAR RUN SLAVE TRADE MONOPOLY?

This is why I do not want to "lead" anything. If you lead that movement you get KILLED and DEAD people can't comment on the Daily Paul. Everybody just needs to start paying attention to what is the CANCER eating out our LIBERTY.

This is not a METAPHOR. I'm not exaggerating. DO NOT HIRE ANY ATTORNEY they are all SOCIALISTS. Fishy please... delete this post or at least save it on your computer. Do not link your credibility to this guy or ANY BAR member.

You're either on team America or you are a BAR member... or you're just not paying attention or don't have all the facts.

I wonder how Mark Cuban feels

I wonder how Mark Cuban feels about the 2nd amendment? Does anyone have his email? He seems pretty cool.

juan maldonado

bump

for activism.

One error.
It's Stewart Rhodes.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
http://www.dailypaul.com/203008/south-carolina-battle-of-cow...
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

thanks

fixed

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

.

bump.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
http://www.dailypaul.com/203008/south-carolina-battle-of-cow...
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15