72 votes

Sandy Hook: Read the last sentence in today's Newtown Bee newspaper article:

This article: As Shooting Probe Progresses Police Union Seeks Funding For Trauma Treatment
By Andrew Gorosko

A man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school on the day of the incident was an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town, according to the source.

http://newtownbee.com/News/2012-12-27__14-58-27/Police%20Uni...

Also, please see Infowars reporter Paul Joseph Watson needs your help on Sandy Hook article he's writing



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

An Inquisitive Couple’s Visit

An Inquisitive Couple’s Visit to Newtown, Connecticut

http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/28/an-inquisitive-couples-...

give this a thread

This is what we need- citizen journalists.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

An excerpt from: We then

An excerpt from:

We then went to the offices of The Newtown Bee, the community’s weekly newspaper, where we spoke with the editor, Mr. Curtis Clark. Mr. Clark did not offer a warm reception and stated from the start that they were concentrating the paper’s efforts on healing efforts and that he had little time. I told him I was there to follow up on The Bee’s report that stated, in part, “A man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school on the day of the incident was an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town, according to the source.” I asked who this officer was, and why he was in the woods.

Mr. Clark told me that there was a number of “conspiracy theories floating around” and “some of them even suggest that the shooting didn’t even happen.” Furthermore, “Snopes.com debunks many of these conspiracy theories.” I told Clark I was familiar with Snopes, but it was The Bee that reported that this was an off duty officer prancing about in the woods on the day of the shooting. Clark would not address this report and became very agitated with me “interrogating” him. “I don’t intend to discuss this any further with you,” he said. Mr. Clark then referred me to the Newtown Police for any additional questions. As I was walking out of the office I overheard a lady on the phone explaining to a caller that “there is an ongoing investigation,” and referring the caller to Snopes.com.

Next, we proceeded to the Newtown Police Department. After entering I walked up to the glassed-in safety window, picked up the phone on the wall and asked the attendant on the other side if I could speak with the Communications Officer. I explained why. He directed me to The Newtown Bee. I advised him that The Bee had directed me to them and he asked me to have a seat. The room was rectangular with doors on both ends. Then, a male and female police officer simultaneously entered through each door. I addressed the female sergeant, telling her I would like to know who was the off duty tactical officer The Bee reported on on December 27. A male officer I was not addressing repeatedly ordered me to remove my hands from my pockets.

The female sergeant told me that the man detained was the uncle of a student at the school who had gone to get his niece. I asked about the police scanner audio where the dispatcher reports that a caller from inside the school saw “two shadows” run by the gym at the back of the school. Additionally, an officer apparently arriving at the scene stated “I’ve got ‘em (sic). They are running at me down Crestwood.” Crestwood Drive borders that backside of the school beyond some woods. The sergeant told me that this was the confusion of the day and that there were not two individuals. “It was just someone that went crazy, killed a bunch of people and then killed himself,” she said consolingly. “You have nothing to worry about. You are safe.” I still wonder.

Keep In Mind

...that if this was a staged event or hoax, the school children would not have been put in harms way. That is why everyone's behavior in interviews does not match real human responses to actual mass shootings. The kids heard "loud noises", the teachers calmly read stories to the children, etc....
If real gunfire occured as part of the staged event, safety measures were likely put in place to guarantee no child would be injured. That's why so many inconsistencies exist. It's IMPOSSIBLE to make a "fake" mass shooting. That's why in the end it won't succeed. The TRUTH eventually leaks out amidst all the holes in such an absurd story.

Wow

So many strange pieces of this event starting to show up. Coincidence? Who knows, but at least information is coming out. I think Jesse Ventura, who just recently took a more wait and see approach to everything, after at first backing off completely from any suspicion of the tragic event, is a telling sign.

We need to get our hands on...

The interior map on Sandy Hook. What classrooms were hit, who was in each classroom, hell, the obvious, where was Lanza's body found, and where were the victims found.

This seems like an easy one. What door did Lanza enter, what was his path through the school. Does anyone have interior photos from the school? These are a few topics I haven't seen discussed.

Something else that does not make sense.

This video talks about shots being fired from outside the classroom window into the classroom. Listen at 3: 32 up to about 3:40.

"Her teacher took first graders into the rest room after bullets came through the window."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7GC5p0Chzs

Also seems like lots of touched up family photos and people pasted into photos. Total lack of tears on faces. The voices sound like the tears should be pouring down faces. Actors normally get real tears by holding a cut up yellow onion just below camera level.

Hate to be so skeptical but too much of this does not add up. Someone mentioned a coffin should be examined to see if there is a body in it. Too much!

I found a paper that corrected it's reporting errors!

http://www.kplu.org/post/police-make-contact-lanzas-missing-...

It is from the next day, when the reporter had time to go back and check for accuracy, which they surely would have done now that they have already had to make one correction...
"Note: Details from this tragedy have changed since this article was published on Friday."

So, have a look at the CORRECTED information:
"The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they official were not authorized to speak publicly about the developing investigation.

The first official said Adam Lanza is dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

According to the first official, the suspect drove to the scene of the shootings in his mother's car. Three guns were found at the scene — a Glock and a Sig Sauer, both pistols — and a .223-caliber rifle. The rifle was recovered from the back of a car at the school. The two pistols were recovered from inside the school."

STILL ONLY TWO GUNS IN THE SCHOOL.
I am sorry, but how do you get the MURDER WEAPON WRONG even once, let alone after a correction?

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Wait up tdd4ron

You said he had a 'rifle'?
Is that the case?..any links to that..

"Hell is empty, and all the devils are here" (Shakespeare)
RP 2012~ Intellectual Revolution.

Noted that a teacher put everyone in a bathroom

adjacent to her classroom then obscured the door from view with a bookshelf. So she was outside of the bathroom so did she live to tell that one? Can't get over that morgue guy call the scene "one big magnificient thing". Crackpots everywhere you look at Sandy Hook.

She actually said

She actually said "barricaded" the door with the bookshelf "before" she closed the door. So she was inside with the children, the barricade outside with the killer--which makes no sense. That's why they edited right there and moved into a shot of "chaos"
on the streets. Then that part was edited out later.
My other thoughts--- Where is her room, where was the bookshelf, where's the bathroom.? What school has a tiny, tiny, tiny bathroom. She makes it sound like a closet. She told them they have to be very very quiet---and then goes on to describe all of the conversations they have.---and all they want is to have Christmas???? All of it sounds too fake to me. Doesn't mean no-one died, but nothing is sure.

No

He was referring to the medical tent that was setup.
Check the full version of the media statement video.
Just to keep the facts right. ~12:58.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=zE0...

"Hell is empty, and all the devils are here" (Shakespeare)
RP 2012~ Intellectual Revolution.

Not a single source,

and the site looks generic, I don't know if it is credible thus I can't think of it as such.

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

Newtown Bee is the same paper that interviewd the

dead principle after the massacre.

No...not credible.

I could understand, somewhat,

I could understand, somewhat, the misunderstanding about the Principal. However, the claims of the Newtown Bee author concerning the man behind the woods being a tactical squad officer from out of town, seem too descriptive to be a misunderstanding. The Newtown Bee said they received this information from "sources". Either the claim is true, the Newtown Bees' sources are incredulous, or the Newtown Bee is making it up. This seems like a different category than the "Principal misunderstanding".

Not to me

They said they spoke with the principal after the massacre, and named her by name. She was dead!

So they are out in La La land completely.

"Danbury State's Attorney

"Danbury State's Attorney Stephen J. Sedensky, III, said this week that five search warrants which were issued to police investigators in probing the mass murder remain under court seal.

Mr Sedensky sought and received a judge's approval to keep those five warrants sealed from public review for 90 days to protect the ongoing crime investigation. He declined to describe the specifics of the warrants.

Those warrants would now be unsealed with their contents disclosed by late March, unless the state seeks and receives from a judge another time extension to keep them sealed.

In a statement on the investigation, the Chief State's Attorney's Office said that the Danbury State's Attorney's Office will continue to work with the state police, Newtown police, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, and other local, state, and federal agencies on the crime probe.

"It cannot be stated too often how invaluable and necessary the work of the United States Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Marshals Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and other federal agencies was and is to this investigation," it added.

Once the investigation has been completed and all documents and evidence are reviewed, Mr Sedensky "will make any appropriate decisions regarding prosecutions pursuant to state law and will issue a report of the incident with input from all agencies involved," according to the statement."

http://newtownbee.com/News/2013-01-03__16-24-26/Police+Inves...

TwelveOhOne's picture

Reminds me of Goebbels

Emphasis mine:

""It cannot be stated too often how invaluable and necessary the work of the United States Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Marshals Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and other federal agencies was and is to this investigation," it added."

Joseph Goebbels - "If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth."

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

Can't wait to hear how they explain this one away.

Great find.

ecorob's picture

EVEN IF this outrageous statement were true...

I would hate to think this "off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town" ran away like a COWARD when children were being killed right in front of him

what a freaking LIE!

the truth, imho, he was a tactical officer, alright, but he WAS ALSO, if he were there, ONE OF THE KILLERS!

and, probably, adam lanza's killer!

i am POSITIVE he was a "controller" of the event in some fashion!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

WHY DID HE RUN????

????

***edit***
by the way, great find.

"The two weakest arguments for any issue on the House floor are moral and constitutional"
Ron Paul

So the local police take 20

So the local police take 20 minutes to show up to a big massacre and an off duty police officer from outside of town is already there? Sounds suspicious to me.

driving directions

From police HQ to school.
http://mapq.st/W976yA

It just so happens... On the

It just so happens... On the day of mass murder at the school, an off duty officer whom was from another city (maybe another state?) is wondering around (alone?) in the woods, dressed in camo and armed with a rifle. I sure doubt those woods are open to hunting. What are the chances?

If this is true the woods need to be searched for a buried body or something.... He couldn't have been up to any good. Makes no sense why would someone travel to be in those woods?

Connecticut hunting rules

Deer hunting would be the only likely hunting situation imaginable, yet unlikely since the land is next to a school. Even so, CT hunting rules state only a smooth or rifled bore shotgun using a single projectile (aka slug). In this case, the report is saying "armed with a rifle." This usually means a gun other than a shotgun, however, I suppose if a shotgun has a rifled bore then technically it could be a rifle.

http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/regulations/26/26-86a-1through...

ALSO

If he was hunting anything other than coyotes or fox, he would have been wearing blaze orange.

Jefferson's picture

Where

did you learn he was "armed with a rifle?" I'm just curious.

If you look at the satellite picture of the area, there's not a single direction you could fire without almost hitting a building or someone.

Definitely NOT hunting grounds.

Look at the posting again.

The sentence above starts with "A man with a gun".

Jefferson's picture

I guess

I took the headline instructions too literally. I went directly to the link and read the last line of the article. It's been a long day. Thanks for the guidance.
There's been so many different versions of stories, it's hard to keep up.
I remember originally reading somewhere that the guy was supposedly the father of one of the kids, and he had just returned from hunting. (no reports of a gun in possession)
If it were one of MY kids and I possibly still had a gun in the vehicle (or even a brick) I wouldn't be running away from the school, I'd be going towards it.