96 votes

Piers Morgan Loses ANOTHER Gun Control Debate, Gets Angry & 'Throws' His Notes


I can only imagine the shock of this guest after being invited onto a CNN prime time show only to have the host lose it and start throwing things in her direction. This man is insane and should be deported at once for being unstable and rude towards guest while at the same time trying to undermine the U.S Constitution.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I wonder...

Has "please moreguns" ever been the victim of an assault?? By multiple people? If he hasn't then he where does he get the wheels to say what someone would need or want to protect themselves.. such a pissy little shill.

Just for the record.. I have been the victim of a home invasion.

Daughter of 1776 American Revolutionists

that was pretty "low rent"...

....for a Brit who is supposed to have manners....

You Probably Posted It First But...

... Here is the full debate (around 12 minutes)


We need to get an early start on 2016: Support Rand PAC 2016



My question to Peirs

Lets just say that there was a total ban on assault weapons. Which leaves the handgun rights to its citizens exercising their second amendment.

Which in turn still leads to irresponsible and criminal ownership of handguns. Which means there can still be mass shootings.

So what are we to do about this situation? The problem is still here! Assault weapons or not. The fact remains the same... how are we going do protect our children and citizens from mass shootings without infringing of the rights of responsible americans?

Let me tell you... our second amendment and open carry. Bottom line!

Peirs says that he supports the ownership of handguns, but his logic is undeniable foolish.

The world is not perfect and never will be. The world is a beautiful and dangerous place deal with it.

Freedom always wins

metalhed19's picture

These 2 beauty queens rocked

These 2 beauty queens rocked it! Piers must be getting quite the raitngs, he keeps hammering on the ripping up of the 2nd amendment...

*Wisconsin Constitution* Article I, Section 25 "The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security,defense,hunting,recreation or any other law-abiding purpose"

I want to see someone ask

I want to see someone ask Piers Morgan if he is the arbiter of need and then follow up by asking how big his home is and then make him defend why he needs it. Then ask him what he drives and make him defend why he needs it. On and on, one choice after another right down to what temperature he keeps the interior of his home at and what he ate for dinner until he loses it or drops the silly 'need' question.

There is some sort of human tendency to justify choices. Thus control freaks exploit this with their need question. They try to make themselves the arbiters of need which in turn gives them power. What I don't like is seeing the more libertarian minded playing this game and coming up with a need. If Piers Morgan asked 'why do you need to breath?' and someone answered 'to get oxygen to live' he could then come back with something about how the person answering didn't need so much O2 or something. There is no 'right' answer to the need question. The person asking is looking for something to ridicule or otherwise make the person answering look bad.

A gun is an object. It is property. There is no justification needed for an AR-15 or any other piece of property rightfully obtained through trade or by one's own manufacture. I would like to see people challenge these questions. Even if the answer is 'I wanted it'. It's time to stop playing their 'need' game. Need is subjective and all they have to do is get a majority manipulated into thinking a need is invalid. Don't argue it.

Plus anywhere it is done successfully becomes precedent for doing it with other things. Oh they get to determine what sort of firearm we 'need'. Well next they'll decide what car we 'need'. Then what food we 'need'... on and on until they control everything. They are looking for social power by framing the argument in terms of need.

The Question

It goes like this... "Why do you need...?"

It is this question that speaks to the nature of liberal communists. They feel as though they know best as to how people should behave, what they should say, what they should buy, how they should worship, etc, etc...

In others words, they're authoritarians. And yet they continuously claim it is conservatives who are the fascists. They are so incredibly brainwashed, they fail to see their hypocrisy.

These are dangerous people.

Why is it...

...that we as Americans, put up with this foreign national trespassing on our soil and telling us that we are wrong for what we hold dear as an inalienable right? Some applaud Peirs for bringing intelligent pro gun advocates onto his show for a debate? I say there is no debate. I say ship his ass home and let him face charges in his own damn country!

░░░░░░███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ ☻/
Il███████████████████]. /▌
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤.. / \

Piers can start were Jimmy Savile left off in England

Morgan maybe another commie Luciferian?.These devils are getting bolder by the day. Piers says he never met the slug from hell.More like MUMS the word.

Money talks and dogs bark

Take that Piers

A strong, smart, believer in the 2A and the self defense just kicked your British buck teeth in, metaphorically speaking of course.

Throw a ball of paper at me in your 'self disgust' and I will stick that ball of paper where the sun don't shine, that is assault pal. Piers Morgan, fit throwing, whiny ass, pussy that won't go back HOME to face charges for perpetrating a lilly livered spy ring he conducted on private citizens and for being a thief of people's private info. I spit on your existence as a human being, Piers. You need some rehab dude, you are high on something and endangering the public.

So far as the shooting is concerned

There is a strange lack of tangible evidence as well as the father of one of the dead girls was laughing before the speech in which he had notes to go by and a couple who smiled during the entire interview with Anderson Cooper. Another thing, while investigating, the officials stated the ar15 was left in the trunk of the car and they said it was the gun used to kill the children.

There are many holes in what happened but the lack of evidence is the part that bothers me most.

Camery I agree, the first

Camery I agree, the first report I heard said the AR15 was left in the car. Either the MSM lied then or they are lying now.

Keep digging...

I am now convinced this is a completely staged event and I doubt that anyone was actually killed. Check this out... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr2SHssCaWM

and this:



People should watch those.. especially the second one !
Why doesn't that surprise me :(

Freedom is a byproduct of acceptance - judge not.

Garan's picture

This is a not a Piers Morgan comment. You should Post it.

I'm guessing that's why you have a down vote.

Paper Cuts

Throwing things at someone and hitting them is legally assault.

One would hope that no gun shop owner would sell him a gun.

Maybe I've been watching too much Dog Whisperer, but when you lose your temper, you lose the fight.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

I have great respect for

I have great respect for Piers. He keeps bringing intelligent pro gun guests onto his show, and ones that address the issue from different angles. He might disagree with us, but he doesn't avoid the truth. He shows the truth, and his screwwy logic, to everyone. Shame on the viewer if they can't learn the truth from these debates.

Good point.

I'll give him that much

Keep um' comin' Piers

We love watching you lose. Someone needs to tattoo "Insert foot here ^" on his chin...something else could be tattooed there as well but lets keep this clean people!

If ignorance is bliss, Washington DC must be heaven.

Pretty close xbanks2

Aside from the fact that Piers isn't getting it, I think it probably has to do with brown nosing the shadow government. I think he is a coward and he is looking for where he thinks the protection is when things really get bad. What Piers doesn't seem to understand is that those he thinks of as friends do not have a heart. They don't care if he lives or dies. For that matter in the end they will be gone too. Then where will that leave him? Every single person he meets will have become a potential enemy. Man what a condition to be in!!!


How's the deportation of this smelly, NWO NAZI shill/coward coming?
He shows these STRONG, SMART WOMEN have bigger balls than he does!
Either one could kick his vagina!!!!


Watched a bit....

Happened to stumble across the interview while looking for the Aussie Grand Slam Tennis match. I could not believe the arrogance, smugness, and out right lack of civility in this man. Taking on two ladies, and not giving them any chance to answer his questions. Just talking over them like some tantrum prone juvenile, and making a complete fool out of himself. I was totally discussed. The man has no scruples whatsoever. He really needs to be taken off the air, he actually represents nothing.

Why, oh why,

can't he go back to Britian? WE DON'T WANT HIS SCUM HERE!!!! What a low life.

at 6:30 he says

"The pair of you would like to have the right to have a tank...".

Well, now we are getting to the heart of the issue. Piers, it is the people who have the right to keep and bear arms, government has permission to use weapons in their duty to protect the rights of the people and defend the constitution. The issue is not whether people need a particular type of firearm, the issue is that the government may not make that decision. It is clearly defined in the second amendment that the right to keep and bear arms may not be infringed.

See the following. http://goo.gl/QEGJi

Someone please send Piers

some douche so he can wash the sand out of his vagina. Why does he even bother to have guests on his show if he's not going to let them answer his questions?

sharkhearted's picture


That first statement caused me to fall out of my chair. Hilarious...and true! And you are right. He never intends to get answers out of people. Because when they answer...he just steamrolls right over them. Everyone is on to his game now. What a fraud journalist he is!

Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

I am thinking that

the big blue banner (on the lower CNN border) declaring that 55% favor stricter gun control...is a big fat lie. Every poll I've noticed over the past few days, show approximately the same percentage (mid-to-high-50's) being AGAINST GUN CONTROL!!

55% of what or whom? CNN employees? Politicians? Control freaks? Certainly not your every-day, average, John Q. Public, though!!

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond

"It shot 17 people".

Speaking of the AR-15 rifle, Piers said, "IT shot 17 people," and repeated "It" multiple times, dutifully trying to personify the gun.

Just ridiculous. An inanimate piece of metal shot people. No, Piers, a drugged person shot the people. Somebody on drugs YOUR sponsors sell!

When Piers was asking the brunette, "Should that man (being attacked by multiple attackers) have shot somebody?" "So that man should have shot his attackers?"

What silly questions!

She could have replied, "Let me ask you, if you were being attacked or your wife was being attacked, and for example, under threat of rape, would YOU shoot your attackers?"

I mean, it's like he believes the answer is you shouldn't shoot people who are attacking you. Silly.

He said James Holmes was a law-abiding citizen and he still shot 17 people in a movie theater. And your point, Piers? Obviously there is crime in the world. "So Piers, are you saying that you believe in a world where there would be no crime?"

He's just plain silly. Do people buy his stuff?

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford

People can be killed by other things too.

Exactly! It did not do anything. You can't outlaw every object (rocks, sticks, bottles, etc) that could be used as a weapon because the objects do not cause the harm, it is the operator that causes the harm.


Maybe somebody should suggest to Piers that murder be outlawed, as that will surely fix the problem.

All crooks start out as law-abiding citizens until they break the law by doing something like murdering seventeen people. The law against murder did not stop the perpetrator, what makes Piers think that other laws would?

What actually could have stopped the perpetrator was the defensive use of force by one of the victims.


"He said James Holmes was a law-abiding citizen and he still shot 17 people in a movie theater."

Proof from his own mouth that gun laws are prone to failure.