96 votes

Piers Morgan Loses ANOTHER Gun Control Debate, Gets Angry & 'Throws' His Notes


I can only imagine the shock of this guest after being invited onto a CNN prime time show only to have the host lose it and start throwing things in her direction. This man is insane and should be deported at once for being unstable and rude towards guest while at the same time trying to undermine the U.S Constitution.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


END the SCHOOL GUN BAN and other "Gun Free Zone" laws.

That must be brought up every time in order to change this debate into a constructive discussion of why killers target schools and specific public places for their massive killings.

Every time someone like Piers asks "why does someone need a __________ gun?" he drives the debate in the direction that he wins, regardless of who answers. Male, female, black, white, logical, emotional. Doesn't matter, we lose.

It's identical to asking "why do you need to publish curse words to millions of people on the internet" in order to undermine our 1st Amendment rights of free speech and the press, or "why do you need to question your legislator directly in person" to undermine our 1st Amendment right to petition our government for a redress of grievance (I'm referencing the law passed last year barring protests within a certain distance of government officials).

When the burden is put on us to prove we need a certain thing or right, the government worshiper has framed the question wrongly. We must reframe it by showing how the government's prohibition against meaningful defense resulted in all these deaths in gun banned zones.

We can't change people's emotions or lack of logical thinking, so we need to change the question being asked and put the burden on the government stooge as to why continue the gun ban when it has resulted in so many mass killings.

Everyone should watch this


Citizens Against Senseless Violence. James O'Keefe has done it again. Great job.

thanks uastudy, for posting that link

maybe that video should have its own thread.I enjoyed it.

I'd rather have a bottle in front o' me than a frontal lobotomy

The woman says exactly what I said when I saw the response

The administration had for the NRA ad. Literally yelled at the TV when it was on the news. The dummy prances kids out behind him to make his announcements and he's been exploiting the dead children from Sandy Hook for his own means for a month now.

Literally as illogical as it can get.

Also, I love Piers slippery slope, "so everybody can have a tank". Like the conversation wasn't specifically about magazine capacity at that point? I hate this douchebag.

they make morgan appear like an idiot but they hardly won the

entire debate on the grand scheme.. that's what happens in most feminine style of debate where you argue with much empathy in your debate.. the topic gets crowded with too much talking and still nothing simple to grasp comes across the presentation to somebody who isn't already informed on the issue.. this country just has to learn to take the logical approach to arguments somehow or it will never advance. a sissy man and two women arguing back and forth on the most trivial details of self defense isn't going to forward this country's consciousness on the true intent of the 2nd amendment, to defend its citizens against radical potentials of the government. one can argue endlessly about what type of weapons is or isn't necessary in self defense, and that is not the point. some people think women are superior talkers because they engage in emotions, i think this is a prime example of why they are not, they speak to more people because many are at the level of being mired still in a mess of emotions, but that level itself is a problem. descending to their level does not help the grand scheme overall, it actually impedes it. there are just some places where emotions cannot carry us. it is a very simple fact.

The way he talks over his

The way he talks over his "guests" is exactly why Alex Jones went at him the way he did.

Live Free or Die Trying

Great comment on that video.

"Piers using children as human shields" and some vulgarities of course.

What a moron

He's becoming a pantomime villain now. The upper-class English twit that everyone loves to hate. Bet he's secretly loving the attention and CNN the ratings, despite the fact that the world despises him. It's the kind of guy he is.

And those women are awesome!!!

Obedience to God is resistance to tyrants.

Schooled by 2 women, Piers throws a hissy fit & crumples paper

What potato-brained demographic is this kind of behaviour appealing to?

This is kind of embarrassing to watch. Don't get me wrong, I want to see more, this s*** is fantastic. The whole "can't look away from a train wreck" thing really applies here.

Ill-mannered rude prick.

CNN: Most trusted name in this f***ing garbage.

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Wouldn't surprise me if he planned it that way

Bad publicity is still publicity.

Ratings matter more than content, and he needs to find some way to remain relevant. The fact that we're still discussing him proves it. ;)

A signature used to be here!

Sure, but I won't be tuning in to CNN anytime soon

Most of this is seen on YouTube so ratings don't really factor in here.

"There's no such thing as bad publicity" is the phrase and yes this is true but he's becoming known for being a completely arrogant tool. "Being an A**hole" should not be a style of interviewing. All he's doing is being a mouthpiece of these corporate f***heads to try and intimidate people. Well, you can't intimidate intelligence so we get to watch Piers burry his career one FAIL at a time.

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Have you noticed

every interview he does about guns, he always says "no one has given me a good reason for why anyone should own an assault weapon". He doesn't want a reason, he just wants to keep asking the same question over and over again. He doesn't care about the answer. I find myself actually getting bored of hearing his voice. This is the only thing keeping his ratings above water. After this dies down, or when people get bored of listening to his ramblings, his ratings will die. Then, he'll have to bring Alex Jones back on again to get more ratings.

I think a good answer would be

"Every American should own one and know how to use it for when the British invade we can repel them back across the ocean just like our forefathers did in 1776."

It is the wrong question anyway

The question is whether the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall be infringed.

Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń

"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln

The gun-grabber you love to hate

Ratings are everything on the teevee.

Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń

"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln


I'll happily watch a youtube/vimeo of Piers making a jackass out of himself, though.

A signature used to be here!

Fun To See

..Piers Morgan B^tch-Slapped by a REAL Woman. LOL!

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

Piers Morgan stoops to yet a

Piers Morgan stoops to yet a new low. When are they going to can his show???

Resist the temptation to feed the trolls.


When the ratings fall to a new low.

Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń

"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln

Should Someone Be Able To Own A Tank?

Well Pierce, apparently some people already do. This guy owns DOZENS:



That's wild!

It was fun the first couple times.

Now it's just formulaic.