3 votes

Gun Control Acts By Obama Evoke Historical Definition of War Against The People

Gun Control, The Proposed Acts by Obama, Violate the "ORIGINAL COMPACT" where the AUTHORITY WAS CREATED and INVOKES THE Historical Definition of the "ACT OF WAR" AGAINST THE PEOPLE.

WARNING!

WE ARE SEEING CLEAR Executive and Legislative "DESIGNS" to ENSLAVE.

Here History is Warning us - "WAR BY DESIGN":

John Locke - on Civil Government #222:

"...whenever the LEGISLATORS endeavour to TAKE AWAY and destroy the PROPERTY of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under ARBITRARY POWER, they put "themselves" into a "STATE OF WAR" with THE PEOPLE, who are thereupon absolved from ANY farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence.

Whensoever, therefore, the LEGISLATIVE shall transgress this FUNDAMENTAL RULE of society, and either by "ambition, fear, folly, or corruption", endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of "ANY OTHER" (Banks, Corporations, Foreign Interests), an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this "BREACH OF TRUST" they FORFEIT the power the people had put into their hands for "QUITE CONTRARY ENDS", -

What I have said here concerning the legislative in general HOLDS TRUE ALSO concerning the "SUPREME EXECUTOR",

who having a double trust put in him, both to have a part in the legislative and the supreme execution of the law, "ACTS AGAINST BOTH", when he goes about to set up his "OWN ARBITRARY WILL" as the law of the society.

He ACTS ALSO CONTRARY TO HIS TRUST (THE AUTHORITY AND LIMITATIONS Created in the ORIGINAL COMPACT WITH THE PEOPLE) when he employs the force, treasure, and OFFICES of the society TO CORRUPT THE REPRESENTATIVES and GAIN THEM TO HIS PURPOSES,

WHEN he openly pre-engages the electors, and PRESCIBES THEIR CHOICE, such whom he has, by solicitation, threats, promises, OR OTHERWISE, WON TO HIS "DESIGNS", and employs them to bring in such who have promised beforehand what to vote AND WHAT TO ENACT.

Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new model the ways of election, WHAT IS IT BUT TO CUT UP THE GOVERNMENT BY THE ROOTS, and POISON THE VERY FOUNTAIN of public security?

TO PREPARE SUCH AN ASSEMBLY AS THIS, and endeavour to set up the DECLARED ABETTORS of his OWN WILL, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, IS CERTAINLY AS GREAT A BREACH OF TRUST, and as PERFECT A DECLARATION of A "DESIGN" to SUBVERT the GOVERNMENT, as is possible to be met with.

To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the same end, and all the "ARTS OF PERVERTED LAW" made use of to take off and destroy all that stand in the way of such a >>"DESIGN", and will not comply and consent to betray the liberties of their country,

IT WILL BE PAST DOUBT WHAT IS DOING.

What power they ought to have in the society who thus employ it "CONTRARY TO THE TRUST"

that along with it in its >>>>"FIRST INSTITUTION" (i.e. ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT)",

is EASY to determine;

and one CANNOT BUT SEE that HE who has ONCE ATTEMPTED ANY SUCH THING AS THIS

"CANNOT ANY LONGER BE TRUSTED..."

RE POST!!! - Get Educated - Pass the Word - Be Prepared - Stand Ready.

-------

HERE IS HOW YOU DO IT, You Nullify it and back it up with FORCE.

As John Locke says it:

Locke #155:"...what if the EXECUTIVE power, being possessed of the force of the commonwealth, shall make use of that force...

...I say, using force upon the people, without authority, and contrary to the trust (Constitution which created and LIMITED that authority) put in him that does so, >>>is a "STATE of WAR" with the PEOPLE, -

In all states and conditions the true remedy of force without authority "IS TO OPPOSE FORCE TO IT".

The use of force "WITHOUT AUTHORITY" always puts him that uses it into a state of war as the aggressor, and renders him liable to be "treated accordingly"...."

-------

Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions, 1798: #8:"...BUT, where powers are assumed which have NOT BEEN DELEGATED, a "NULLIFICATION" of the act is the RIGHTFUL REMEDY:

that every STATE has a natural RIGHT in cases NOT within the COMPACT, (casus non fœderis) to "NULLIFY" of their >>>>>>>>"OWN AUTHORITY" all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them:

-------

Much Respect to the PRESENT DAY LEADERS of this Principle:

Wyoming leads the Way to Protect 2nd Amendment pressing Jail Time for Feds who do not obey the Second Amendment: http://forlibertysake.wordpress.com/2013/01/10/wyoming-propo...

Kentucky Sheriff Stops Gun Control: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/11/Kentucky-...

Linn County, Oregon Sheriff Stops Gun Control: http://www.businessinsider.com/tim-muellers-letter-to-joe-bi...

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...



Trending on the Web