56 votes

Paper is Warning Americans of "anti-Federalists"!

A West Point think tank is warning Americans of an “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”

This paper typically focuses on "al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists attempting to gain power in Asia, the Middle East and Africa through violence."

The report also draws a link between the mainstream conservative movement and the violent “far right,” and describes liberals as “future oriented” and conservatives as living in the past.

“While liberal worldviews are future- or progressive -oriented, conservative perspectives are more past-oriented, and in general, are interested in preserving the status quo.” the report says. “The far right represents a more extreme version of conservatism, as its political vision is usually justified by the aspiration to restore or preserve values and practices that are part of the idealized historical heritage of the nation or ethnic community.”

FULL ARTICLE HERE: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/17/west-point-c...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well crap

Federal Farmer, the name I am using, was a penname for an Anti-federalist that opposed the constitution on the grounds that it would by misinterpreted and lead to a despotic government.

It's the criminals

who have taken over power positions in this country who should be being warned.

If they managed to get into West Point

I would hope they have the smarts to see throught this.

Think T@nks

...just like boxes. It's difficult to think outside them.

Patrick Henry and Samuel

Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams were anti federalists so we are in good company. The anti federalists were afraid the federal government would become to strong and while they were not successful in stopping the constitution from being ratified, they were able to get the bill of rights added to the constitution. Their fears have come true.It seems that they were very wise men indeed.

AMC Launches 'We Hate Paul Revere' Show to Demonize Founders

"There will be pundits riding through town warning of a pending invasion not because thats true, but because they are crazy and want attention." - Internet Meme

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VACOVQRVHI

http://www.infowars.com/hollywood-labels-founding-fathers-te...

"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_enlistment

There is no duration defined in the Oath

GoodSamaritan's picture

Please don't hold this against all West Point grads

There are a few grads, such as myself, who are part of the Liberty Movement and are not surprised by the left-wing bias of that paper. Political Correctness gained a stranglehold on the Academy in 1976 when women were admitted for the first time. I entered a year later and the atmosphere was thick with PC. If a cadet or officer valued his career, then anything - ANYTHING - said even in the most innocuous way that could possibly be perceived as negative toward the presence of women at West Point, or in the Combat Arms in general, was verboten and dealt with harshly. Some of the senior officers, especially the Commandant, worked overtime to cover up unfavorable incidents involving the women that might have leaked to the press.

Just remember that statist bureaucrats come in both gray and green suits. The military is all about top-down, authoritarian control and therefore has little in common ideologically with those who love individualism and liberty. The U.S. Military Academy is a significant source of future officer and civilian leadership in the Military Industrial Complex. Despite taking the Oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, too many Academy grads will consider career first and foremost. Cadets are taught that they do not have to obey illegal orders, but at the same time they learn through daily participation in military life that even hinting at disobedience, or opposing group-think, is likely career stunting – or ending.

Ron Paul - Honorary Founding Father

It looks like the groundwork for brainwashing our soldiers into

Being able to fire without regret upon American citizens is being laid before our very eyes.

Any chance someone can find propaganda put out by the Nazi Wehrmacht before the outbreak of World War II where they do the very same thing, coloring anti-federalist Germans as terrorists? I bet it's out there somewhere.

This needs to be brought to Ron Paul's attention

We know he's now doing speaking tours and perhaps he can get one at West Point and debunk this garbage and learn them younguns a thing or two about our founding principles.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

Not only that

But Stuart Rhodes of Oathkeepers needs to be alerted to this as well.

For The Power of The Republic!

whenever someone mentions

"white supremacists" I'm going to ask them if they have as much power as jewish supremacists, aka zionists.

The ones whose rabbis constantly tell them that gentiles are less than human and only are allowed to live to serve jews. And yes, that can be sourced.

"If this mischievous financial policy [greenbacks], which has its origin in North America, should become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debts. It will hav

I'm an anti-federalist

So I oppose the constitution. Isn't it Orwellian double-think to say the constitution limited state power, when in fact it expanded the power of government well beyond the Articles of Confederation?

Here is one of my favorite anti's, Philadelphiensis:

"BEFORE MARTIAL law is declared to be the supreme law of the land, and your character of free citizens be changed to that of the subjects of a military king - which are necessary consequences of the adoption of the proposed constitution - let me admonish you in the name of sacred liberty, to make a solemn pause.

"A conspiracy against the freedom of America, both deep and dangerous, has been formed by an infernal junto of demagogues. Our thirteen free commonwealths are to be consolidated into one despotic monarch.

"Who can deny but the president general will be a king to all intents and purposes, and one of the most dangerous kind too - a king elected to command a standing army."

I posted more quotes awhile back. You can find most of their writings for free online.

they can call us what they want!

but i cant guarantee how much blood will flow once the nations constitutional rights becomes scarce!

Correction:

You're rights do NOT come from the constitutional. You are born with them naturally and cannot be given or taken away.

________________________________________

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. ~Thomas Paine

Turning Al Qaeda into White America was the PLAN

Just look at the Dark Knight Returns. Bane attacks Wallstreet to support the 99% and are 'anarchists', then it turns out they come from a pit in the middle east and wear turbans.

I remember growing up watching Soviet Propaganda and then Jackie Chan movies and seeing the propaganda, but man the USA movies today are thickly layered in it.

================================
Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9ir62bp8nshv83m

Grouped Up

They are grouping freedom-loving, Constitution-loving, Liberty-loving folks in with racist white supremacy groups...

This is a sad state indeed.

Don't take this lightly

This will impact an entire generation of the "best and brightest" who put on a uniform and never stop to consider what gives them the authority to use force or the threat thereof against innocent people (well, they won't be innocent according to the definition propounded by this think tank).

And before you dismiss me, ask yourself what you, personally, are going to do when they put away the more "radical" elements of the liberty movement... Like a story I heard about a marine in Virginia and an activist in Alaska. Pretty easy to take out the resistance one person at a time because even when we know about it, we do nothing.

Unlearning and self-teaching since 2008. Thanks, Dr. Paul!

here is the actual report link

Long Read

148 pages. Worth it though.

I got to here: "Violence derived from the modern anti-federalist movement appeared in full force only
in the early to mid-1990s and is interested in undermining the influence, legitimacy and
effective sovereignty of the federal government and its proxy organizations. The anti-
federalist rationale is multifaceted, and includes the beliefs that the American political
system and its proxies were hijacked by external forces interested in promoting a “New
World Order” (NWO) in which the United States will be absorbed into the United
Nations or another version of global government. They also espouse strong convictions
regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a
natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they
support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-
federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its
proxies in law enforcement."

What is wrong with activism, individual freedoms, and self government?

While they label us as extremists, they do exactly what we believe they are doing. "believe that the American political
system and its proxies were hijacked by external forces interested in promoting a “New
World Order” (NWO) in which the United States will be absorbed into the United
Nations or another version of global government."

What I find to be the most amazing, is that these folks really believe what they are saying.
That is what makes them so dangerous.
We live in perilous times.

Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

John Adams

lol

Did Freedomsreigning write this?

A signature used to be here!

As an anarchist, i applauded

As an anarchist, i applauded the Articles of Confederation, and thought the Constitution was too progressive. But i'm definitely in favor of the Constitution just for the sake of being called an Anti-Federalist.

lawrence

I am...

"anti-Federalist"!

When Fascism goes to sleep, it checks under the bed for Ron Paul!

My first guess was Southern

My first guess was Southern Poverty Law Center

Southern Agrarian

This is laughable to say the least...

End the wars, end the Fed, end government collectivism, don't use force except in cases of self-defense...

Yeah, sounds pretty violent to me as compared to murdering civilians - men, women, and children - through unmanned drone strikes, starving entire populations through economic sanctions, and conducting offensive wars. Yeah, the leftist administration we currently have now certainly is forward thinking. After all, indiscriminate murdering is a very modern tactic while individual freedom is very outdated.

Most of this is garble about nothing

They want to label anyone who criticizes the government.

"It says anti-federalists “espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government."
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/17/west-point-c...
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Falsehood runs deep.

Failure to learn from fatal errors made by dead people can be illustrated with a scenario taught to new students of emergency medical care.

Past oriented = fatal errors known to be fatal errors

Future oriented = fatal errors will continue so know better about them

A person arrives on the scene and a person is visible at the scene as a victim of some injury, the victim is not moving in the distance ahead.

A.
Move to a future place where the injured person is, do so quickly, the injured person appears to be dead from a distance away from the victim.

B.
Learn from the past, look around, take in the scene, there can be hazards that exist in that future place whereby you will be the next victim, and call for help now, while you have the chance to do so, as you appraise the situation before jerking your knee, leaping into an obviously dangerous future place.

Moving onto the concept of "Anti-Federalists".

You, reader, aught to read some.

The country America started as a defensive action to preserve a working Democratic Federated Republican Voluntary Government in 13 States that were claimed as property by criminals in England.

OK, so you don't use English words like I do, granted.

There is this document called The Declaration of Independence.

The free people who volunteered to leave England, going to America, declared that it was their duty to stand their ground against criminals running governments.

No matter which English words used, that is the lesson offered.

Stand your ground against criminals taking over government.

That is how Democratic Federated Republicans, of the day, thought and acted.

They were called by many names:

1. Rebels
2. Rabble
3. Insurgents
4. Patriots
5. Free people
6. Liberated people
7. Commoners
8. Common Law people
9. Democratic Republicans
10. The angry Mob
11. Secessionists
12. Friends of Liberty

If a Tory or Loyalist spoke of the free people they used a set of words that made a claim upon the people who set themselves free, as if saying "You, yes you, you belong to me, and my army, so you may think that you can run away, slave, but this word I'm using can let everyone know that you belong to me and my army, because I say so, and you are not allowed to question that fact, Rebel, Insurgent, slave, etc."

Left out of the list above is the word Federalist.

The information you aught to know, all you people standing on the edge of the new future situation ahead, is that Federalist was a name stolen by Nationalists, it is a False Front.

Federalist is a false front name.

So the warning offered by the past is to warn the people on the edge of a new future, to say to those people, look around, and look for false front names, like Federalist, because there are criminals hiding behind those false fronts, and they are ready to claim you as their property.

If you begin to resist the criminals who call themselves Federalists, as has happened in history, what do you think you will be called when you begin to resist the criminals who are hiding behind the false front called Federalist?

You will be called Anti-Federalist.

You can protest the name, and you can say that you are not against Federalism, but that does not matter to liars, criminals, and those who work to own you.

You, according to those who work to own you, must obey without question, and here, they say, is your name, or your number, or whatever those who work to own you tattoo on your forehead figurative or literally.

As people stand on the edge of the new future on Earth, here in America, it also aught to be understood that the real POWER of criminal government is gained when those who work to own you convince you that you are one of them.

You are already dead, in that case, but you have no way of knowing that fact, since your freedom has been stolen between your ears.

Good luck with that fools.

Joe

FYI

http://www.infowars.com/nobel-peace-prize-nominee-obama-asks...

from here: http://www.dailypaul.com/271465/nobel

You may have already seen this, but it appears there is a purge taking place.

Also quoting from the article a comment regarding Waco

"Last week, Gloversville Mayor Dayton King warned that any federal gun confiscation program could lead to a “Waco-style standoff” in rural areas of America."

Do you read that article as being the truth? I am not talking just about the statement I quoted above. I am talking about the whole article.

...

Coincidences?

As we two are narrowing down our viewpoints on the measure of mankind, as we judge, or borrow judgment, or believe judgement, or know judgment, concerning the relative good or bad of human kind, this shows up?

An effort to remove any employee or, please, can we use my POWER perspective for awhile here?

Traders.

Not employees.

Not employers.

Traders.

An effort to remove traders who won't "fire on US citizens" is the same exact effort to keep (have an association connected to) traders who will "fire on US citizens" is the object in view.

Someone, some group, is collecting up a number of people (traders) who will "fire on US citizens".

How about removing the false front: "fire on US citizens"?

Can we agree to remove that false front from the discussion?

Instead of "fire on US citizens", can we realize, before it is too late, that those symbols are lies?

Why not know, instead, that the topic in view is murder?

What is the topic in view?

Person A orders person B to do something. Person B obeys the order, because Person B is specifically found and utilized as a fellow associate because Person B is specifically qualified to act according to a specific set of actions desired by both Person A and Person B.

Murder.

Why confuse murder with "fire on US citizens"?

Who benefits when anyone agrees to trade with those enemies, by using their false front words?

Why not start speaking the actual truth?

So, assuming, that you agree to start using accurate words, and we both start speaking the truth, we have in view a number of past, current, and future murderers who have been on a crime spree, and the crime spree is serial killing and mass murder.

Is it at all a surprise to you, knowing the truth of this, that the murderers are seeking to join their forces into a more powerful murderous gang of murderers?

I'm not surprised.

Why should I be surprised?

Are you really needing any help with this thing in view?

Please notice how the Prison Planet article employs quotes liberally.

Note how I can't even use the word "liberally" without knees jerking, people seeing "Red", or "Pink".

Note too the reference to China.

I'm telling you, bear, the World War III thing is the focus of destructive POWER at this time, and all these other things are distractions.

The FED is going down, it is a corporation that is being raided, and the empty shell, and all of American productivity, as much as can be destroyed, is being destroyed.

There may yet be a few more false booms before the actual shift of POWER from The FED to the new World Reserve Currency Power, shifting to Asia, or wherever, who knows.

I don't.

China is fit for it.

China is fit to be tied.

They are booming, buying up Gold, buying up debt.

"They" are masters and slaves, all slaves to falsehood, same as America.

So, will mankind prove to be good, or bad?

Will our military at the Colonel level and lower succeed in retaking the POWER of moral conscience, or not?

Waco happens every day, the names are different, the color of the skin is different.

Free traders trade freely all the time too, while much of their power is stolen by deception, powering the routine, the Fraud and Extortion in various forms such as The FED and IRS.

How many murders have you had in your yard?

I have had none.

What is the full measure of mankind?

You have a powerful edge over my viewpoint, a sound currency that you call The Word of God.

I hope you are wrong.

I think mankind is good, in so many more ways, more powerful ways, than those few criminals running amok among us, and I think that our Military/Police/Citizens (same thing) will prove the point before We The People end up being either/or murdered or murderers.

Joe