Hypothesis - Sandy HookSubmitted by Remnant Patriot on Sat, 01/19/2013 - 12:52
I had a brain tremor last night, and I don't know if this has already been brought up. Guess I'll find out in a minute.
First, check out these articles that I had posted elsewhere:
Said post included this text:
Drills like these serve multiple purposes.
1. Increase public paranoia of domestic terrorists.
2. Get police used to working with soldiers.
3. Get soldiers used to being used on American citizens.
4. Get everyone used to viewing constitutionalists as terrorists.
5. Reinforce the gun control position in the current political struggle against private firearm ownership.
Hypothesis: Sandy Hook was one of the biggest "exercises" ever pulled off (almost) by our government - except Sandy Hook was way more elaborate, as in, it included hundreds of people, local/state/federal officials, funerals, etc, and was worldwide.
Wouldn't this "work" for their gun grabbing barrage that was obviously already in place, they were just waiting for this false flag - for the deception of the nation/world to begin?
It makes sense to me. . . The towns people/parents of children who came to the scene - they could be innocent. Someone had asked me about the children, saying children usually won't lie. The kids interviewed didn't lie. They did hear things, and were reacting to how the adults were behaving. In line with that the unknowing townspeople were reacting to the "actors" at the scene.
People do react to stimulus around them. . .whether it's good or bad. Think about the "laugh tracks" they use on sitcoms - people hear/see laughing so they laugh - even if it's not funny.
We know that the media learned mass human manipulation a long time ago, that humans can be moved like a school of fish.
If truly innocent by-standers rushed to the school - and were convinced by those ridiculous "actors" that all of those children and adults were shot to death - they're seeing people panicking and "acting" their parts - they would react to that in the same way. You would.
Seriously. . .think about it. . .the intercom mysteriously being on, all they heard were sounds. . .like an old radio program where they would read stories and add sounds, gun shots, clippity-clop for horses, for example.
Other than the (really BAD) "actors" - no one credible saw bodies or blood, (not that I need to see that). We didn't see any bodies being taken out (they paraded something on a guerney through the parking lot - that doesn't count). Not one picture of the broken front door glass. No surveillance video showing the front door getting shot out. We did not see one actual tear from parents whose child was heinously murdered - just fake crying, then laughing, butterflies, and rainbows. The list goes on and on. . .
We did see blocked in ambulances. We saw/heard threats of Federal Marshals - first time in history that our entire nation was threatened to have Federal Marshals show up at their door for communicating with each other. We saw that no one knew the shooter. Et Cetera.
The stories are sideways, backwards, and clash with each other. That's not how "truth" works. Truth is consistent - AND - makes sense.
Since it's Gun Appreciation Day - shoot holes in my hypothesis (not me) - please. Give me PROOF. Sandy Hook could be as simple and as elaborate as merely a government "exercise".