20 votes

Fifty Shades Of Grey – Pedophilia Hidden In Plain Sight

The story of convicted child rapist Jerry Sandusky is well known. So too is the Fifty Shades of Grey phenomena, a book that has become so popular among women that some are referring to it as “Mommy Porn” for the masses. That description is actually a lot more disturbing than a lot of folks are currently realizing.

Yes, 50 Shades is pornography. Like most pornography, the storyline is weak, the characters one-dimensional, while the sex itself graphic, detailed, but formulaic. The underlying theme to 50 Shades is something far more sinister and appalling though than your mere run-of-the-mill porn. It is pedophilia. It is child porn. Kiddie porn.

Now I know after saying that, many female fans of 50 Shades, many of them mothers, will naturally put up a defense against that kind of description. These women, being mothers, are naturally wired to protect kids. People like Jerry Sandusky are viewed with hatred, revulsion, and disgust. Rightfully so. What mother would want to condone anything having to do with the sexual abuse of children? Of innocents?

But that is exactly what Fifty Shades of Grey is really about. It is a story of a girl being sexually molested, over and over again, by a male figure with all the power, all the control. It is the classic abuse scenario. And mothers are, in some cases, quite literally getting off on it, which takes the disgust of this phenomena to a whole other frightening level.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yeah, and who makes movies out of books that bomb?

And how does a terrible book become a best seller? Media hype. This book is being forced into the "national conversation" and made "best" by decree. It is like these politicians who "win" elections, then 2 weeks later they have a 16% approval rating.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.


We are not the only ones asking how a terrible book becomes a best seller. House of smoke and mirrors. You really have to stay alert to find the truth these days.


The "child" in the story is described as 21 years old, getting ready to graduate college.
But I'll be open minded here.

What it comes down to is:

I can buy into the rhetoric and do something about this supposed pedophilia literature... maybe organize some kind of nazi-style book burning?


I can get my nose out of other peoples' lives so I can better look after my own.

Yes but the argument is that

Yes but the argument is that the protagonist talks like a child, hence the emphasis on the 'cart wheels', 'skipping' 'pigtails' and phrases like 'double crap'.

The writer makes the point that if you read the story whilst not taking any notice of the girl's age, it's a story of paedophilia.

But it would be interesting to see how many more much-loved stories you could change simply by editing the age, wealth, size or race of a character.

My wife is 28

We have 4 kids. I'm only 31. She listens to Selena Gomez songs (Disney girl), colors in a coloring book, likes sparkles, reads Twighlight (written for young adults) and does all sorts of other stuff that seems childish. However, she raises our kids like a good mother, she works, she went to college, and she is free to act as young as she wants whenever she wants. Part of that is just a sexual dynamic amongst women who like to feel young and vibrant and taken care of by an older "more mature" man. The book, written by a woman, seems to understand that. I never had the inclanation to read it, because porn is free on the interweb, but women feel embarrassed about porn, so sometimes they need it disquised in book form.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).


So literature about a 21 year old who has their hair in pigtails and cartwheels should be considered incriminating enough.

Yeah, ok... let's see where we go with this.

Well, that book titled The Hobbit? Yeah, it's pornography as well. Bilbo is short, like a child, sleeps with gruffy old men like that pedo Gandolf and a bunch of bearded old men supposedly "dwarves". It's no wonder Bilbo's name sounds so much like a certain sex toy!

So, let's get together and burn 50 Shades of Grey and The Hobbit and... well, you know what? There's mention of gay men sleeping with each other in The Bible, should we burn that too? It is a violent book.
Speaking of violence, there's lots of books with violence in it, isn't murder like one of the worst things you can do to someone?
Yes, any literature that has murder in it needs to be burned as well.

And if anyone refuses to burn their "bad" books, then I guess we'll just have to employ violence on them for not giving up their violent books.

Yes, I see where this is going. Brilliant!

The above was (very) sarcastic. (rolls eyes)

YOU are the ONLY ONE talking about censorship

The rest of us are discussing an example of social engineering. Please, go read all the porn you can find, I truly do not care. Sounds like you might really enjoy the snuff porn. I don't care. But people who are concerned about deliberate manipulation of their psyche understand, I am sorry you are so hung up on defending porn that you can't get past it.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

What to Do?

And here I come along and see this thread thinking that MAYBE someone has done some real work and found some subliminal messaging in an occult work or something.
What a disappointment.
Now there's just a silly show of people getting worked up over some smut. Not so entertaining.

I believe the question imposed was: So what do you want to do about it?

Apparently if this is child pornography then the example we've been shown is whining and complaining on a liberty oriented website.
Well, that is very just very cool...
But not something I'm into.

Again, I'll simply just say "Ok, I'll believe you: this is conditioning us to accept pedophilia".
So... I'll have to add it to my long list of having to be accepting of homosexuals, blacks, women, vegetarians, Libertarians, cute little kittens... etc.
It's a big nothing.

Now that we've got that over with maybe we can focus on some REAL problems.

Just whatever you do: Don't read Romeo & Juliette.
Full of pedophilia and violence!

Be aware.

That was the point. If you equate pedophilia with vegetarianism, their efforts are working.
For the LAST time, there was not ONE WORD about censorship in the article or OP.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

Missing the Point

Let me say this again so you can follow along:
Even if it is more than just disguised pedophilia, even if it is some kind of mastermind's social engineering tool... nothing was proposed about what to do about it.
The only thing done was whining about it on this site.
Whining and complaining does little good.
The option to burn the book and enforce censorship would actually do something to stop this (supposed) social engineering.

But before we can get to the book burning you're going to have to prove that it is an evil tool of mass mind control making us all be more accepting of people who are into college girls being little brats.

Until then, we'll be stuck with a bunch of babies complaining here and never get to the good ol' book burning. So get to work.

What did he say exactly that

What did he say exactly that makes it sound like he'd enjoy snuff-porn?

All I saw was him saying that people should be free to read and write what they like. Don't you think its a bit over the top to accuse someone who disagrees with you of enjoying snuff porn?

Does the understanding that someone has the right to put drugs into their own body mean that we endorse drugs?

Does the understanding that someone has the right to read and write weird or even immoral porn mean that we endorse immoral porn?

Does writing fiction deprive someone else of their right to life, liberty or property? Please remember that freedom means you're free to be an idiot. You're free to engage in activity that is immoral and self destructive so long as you are only hurting yourself. If you want a free society, you must understand that not everyone is going to be a goody-two-shoes god-boy. There are plenty of sick monkey's out there who do plenty of sick stuff. Long as they do it to themselves, you and I have absolutly NO say in what goes on in the privacy of their own homes, or with other consenting adults.

What about Vladamir Navokov's Lolita? A literary classic involving a sick monkey's obsession for underage girls. Did that create a generation of pedophiles?

What kind of book exactly, is going to "culturally condition" parents into thinking its okay to have freaky pedophiles trying to seduce their children? I can't even concieve of letting my daughters date until they are at least 35... let alone when they are 12. Do you think a freaking work of fiction is going to change my mind? Or even a lot of them?

Look at the Japanese. Half the crap they come out with is about tenticle monsters raping little girls, yet pedophilia (and all other uncensored porn) is still illegal there and they have almost no crime. Most of the men there are perfecty content to go buy dirty panties out of a vending machine, rent a love doll, and check into a hotel room. Weird freaking culture, ill be the first to admit, but they aren't hurting anyone, nor depriving anyone of their rights. I think some people get a little too hung up on the impact of "fiction" esspecially in the realm of sex. Infact... I think some people just get to hung up on sex in general.

Pedophiles are always going to be criminals. Always. Fathers will always be ready to execute any mother@#$%ing peodphile who goes near his children. Always. Sleezy porn and literature is "not" going to change that.

I was being sarcastic, my bad.

But I sahll explain to you, since you seem to only read the sarcastic part of my reply...
I DON'T ADVOCATE CENSORSHIP OF THE BOOK. I want people to see a well done example of SOCIAL ENGINEERING AT WORK.
Can you hear me now?

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

I understood it the first

I understood it the first time. I disagree with your opinions. I disagree that "You sound like you enjoy snuff-porn" is simple sacrasm. It sounds more like a baseless attack to me, an attempt to demonize someone who doesn't agree with you. It was completely uncalled for given the debait you two were having.

Next, I disagree that there is any mass conditioning going on to make pedophila acceptable in America. Everyone HATES pedophiles. As for this book, tts not social engineering. Its smut. Smut has been around for as long as humans could draw boobies on rock walls. Its not going anywhere.

Pedophiles will never be accepted into society no matter how many "Lolitas" are written. No matter how many "50 shades of grey" are written.

I won't disagree that some of the boy-hungry pedophiles up in DC would probably love to see that happen, but it wont.

Protecting our children from perverts in not a "christian" thing. Its a "human" thing. As the christian religeon dies out, it will not mean that suddenly everyone accepts pedophiles.

Well, you are just wrong.

Not everyone hates pedophilia, In fact, there is an effort to normalize it in psychiatry.


Now, if you understood that there really was a push to normalize pedophilia, you would perhaps understand why I got exasperated with the "censorship" nonsense.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

What im saying is that it

What im saying is that it won't happen. Ever.

Even if some ologarchs at the top use their "pull" to push psychologhists into claiming its normal, its not going to mean a damn thing to parents.

No parent is going to say: "Welp... the gove says its normal, so go ahead and have sex with my ten year old daughter grampa."

No society on the face of the earth has ever "normalized" pedaphilia. Not even the greeks. What HAS happened in history is that balance of power between serfs and lords has grown so disproportionate at times that the Lords rape children as they please, and the serfs have no say in the matter unless they want to have an extended stay in the torture chamber.

Tyrants do what they want. The only way pedophiles will become "normal" in THIS society, is if we let the tyrants disarm us and turn us to serfs. I guarantee you no matter what the "law" says, any @#$%ing pedo lays a hand on my daughters, and they sprout some leaks... badge and all.

As for those sources you posted, the pschologists are simply saying that attraction to children is a sexual preferance. They aren't saying its freaking legal to have sex with them. And they are right. Of course it is a sexual preferance. If it wasn't, then those people would "prefer" something else. Woe to the poor bastards born that way. Can you imagine worse fate? I expect a lot of these people wouldn't mind a little research done on this matter in hopes of figuring out a way to rewire their @#$%ed up minds so they don't turn into preditors in the future.

We are past the days where everything that is evil in society get a big "satan" stamp on it, and the learning stops there. If you want to stop pedophiles from stalking your children, you have to learn what makes them tick. The brain is a computer, and it can be decoded, and in extreme cases, rewired.

Personally I would love to see a little science done on this issue in the hopes that the POS eyeballing my daughter may actually go get help and get a cure as opposed to hiding away until he becomes a repressed lunitic and kidnaps a child.

What can I say? You are wrong.

I see my daughter and her friends tolerating things that I am horrified by. They say I am just a prude. I have been told by a number of young mothers and fathers that it is healthy and normal for a father to deliberately sexually arouse his children, that they child is too young to understand so there is no harm being done, and it is just good clean fun.
Have a look at any "children's entertainment" and see what parents deliberately expose their children to, and look with "open eyes."
It is already happening.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.


You can remain aware that what society considers "normal" is constantly being molded by the arts. Has been, for centuries.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.


So we'll see more 21 year olds skipping and doing cartwheels. Big deal.
I don't control other people. Why should I care someone wrote this book? Why should I care people read this book?
The answer: I don't.

I'm not going to bother reading the book, it doesn't sound very interesting, and I am not going to start telling people how to live their lives. If they want to read some stupid book about abuse and control that's their own choice. I'm going to spend my time reading books I find more important.
When people say I need to burn my "End the Fed" book because it offends them I'll simply respond saying "I never burned any of your offensive books, so leave me alone".

Are you really that thick?

No one suggested burning a book, or even preventing anyone from reading it. The point is to be aware that in ALL ENTERTAINMENT, not just this book social engineering is at work.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

Agree with fishy. This book and movie to come is about

social engineering, making pedophilia an accepted norm.

We have been led into the age of non-stop violent movies. Violence has become the norm.

Let us not allow ourselves to be led down the road into acceptance of pedophilia and "child sex parties" and the movies that might come from that acceptance. Let us not normalize pedophilia.


slowly creeps in...

When Fascism goes to sleep, it checks under the bed for Ron Paul!

I hope this gets lots of attention.

This "normalization" is real, it has been going on for decades. I have witnessed the ravages personally. It gives me hope to see some mental health professionals are on to it, the ones I encountered were enabling it.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.