78 votes

Sandy Hook Conspiracy is growing some legs!

People on the right, left, and apolitical are coming out all over the place, on facebook, at my wife's place of work(hair salon) and calling the official story bullshit..

I think this issue if pushed just right might be the issue that saves the US from tyranny.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Suppresors

I have heard of police losing hearing firing form inside vehicle and i thought that is why agencys have requested suppresors.

I doubt he would of been knocked out, but then again i doubt he could of carryed all the weapons and ammo, never had a jam or problem, dropped mags before empty so he would never run out ... this takes training ... I also heard they investigated a few ranges around the house ... never heard or seen the Lanza's shooting

I need to make a video

I'll wait until these lying thugs release the official report, then I am going to make a video of me trying to put on all that gear and walk, and if I can find an AR 15 to borrow I'll take it to a range and let people see how many shots I can fire how fast. It takes a while when you get knocked around like a sock puppet. I'm about his size, and although much older I do more physical labor than video gaming so I should be in better shape.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

What official report?

What do you mean "wait for the official report"? Isnt' this entire conspiracy based on you guys saying that the "official story" is bogus. And now you tell me the official report isn't out. So what "official story" are you all claming to be bogus? Are you just talking about what the news said, or what some police spokesperson said? What is the "official story" and what makes it official? And if the "official story" is already out, and you all know it is bogus, then why wait for an official report?

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

Do you want to understand, or pick a fight?

We have media reports. Wildly conflicting, many claiming official sources. We talk about the conflicts in those reports. In the face of a MEDIA driven narrative that does not fit the facts the media themselves are spinning, it is natural that people ask "What really happened?" and begin to wonder aloud at the possibilities. They share those thoughts to see what others think, if there is any merit to the idea.
If and when the police release an official report, and I think they will, that report will be scrutinized again. If the police maintain that someone my size did that, I will make a video proving it is physically impossible. I'll go round up 120 pounders, find some weight lifters, some serious riflemen, if I can get to go along with it. You can not walk around carrying your own weight and fire with pinpoint accuracy at lightning speed and run around KNOCKING on some doors and shooting through others and blowing a hole through a security door at the front and getting over 100 rounds off... It is ludicrous. Randy Newman was wrong, short people do have a reason to live, but we have physical limitations. Lanza was, as another poster observed, a runt.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

You want the door? The door?...

About the door...

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

How come I never saw that before?

That is awesome.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Either way is fine with me.

I just hear so much from people that "the official story is bogus". That is their back up line whenever one of their conspiracies is debunked. I just don't like the term "official story". It implies that some official police report has already been given to the public, and that the report is inconsistent with itself. If you are simply talking about media reports being inconsistent, those are not anything "official". And of course the media is inconsistent, they are incompetent. They also rush to report so they can keep their ratings high, so they report false info because they didn't check it. They interview people who aren't really credible winesses, then when the report seems to contradict something some other station said, the conspiracy crowd clames that the "official report" is inconsistent.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

I have yet to see a

I have yet to see a conspiracy theory in this thread. Is it conspiracy theory to ask why we haven't seen the video of Adam Lanza breaking down the door?

Since when does raising valid

Since when does raising valid questions equate to being a conspiracy theorist?

All I'm saying...

..in this particular topic, is that there is no "official story". When you clame that the media reports are inconsistent, or potentially wrong, that is fine. However, claming that there is some "official story" which is inconsistent, that is innaccurate because their isn't an "official story" yet.
If you were to claim that the 911 commission report was innacurate, and thus they "official report" was faulty, that would be fine. The 911 Commission Report was and actual "official report". Sandy Hook has no "official report" at this time.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

SteveMT's picture

You ask why is there no official story?

The story has been changed so many times and has been proven wrong so many times that there can be no official story. They have not provided any verifiable facts, only lies.

Who are they?

The news stations don't work on the same team. They compete to get you the newest information first. There is no "they" and they don't have a specified job of getting you the "official story". They are just entertatiners who are trying to get viewers, so they report early and often no matter if they've confirmed anything or not. They don't have to correct themselves if another station reported something different. They are entertainers and they are innaccurate quite often. When you guys use the term "they" and the "official story", it makes the common listner think you are picking apart some official government report that was released about the incident. If that was the case (such as the 911 Commission report), then you could truthfully say "they" and the "official report", and it would mean something. When you say "they have lied to us about the official Sandy Hook report", you don't really mean anything, you just want it to seem like someone official is lying. The news isn't official, they don't always work together to get the best version of the truth, they work independently to get ratings, and they report whatever they heard as soon as they can.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

True, but with media

True, but with media consolidation, rarely will the big media companies divert on big issues, like the trustworthiness of the state.

You're a "Go Getter" fishy!

Keep at it and surely, you will come up with more as you dig!
Enjoy your posts, especially on this issue!

Thanks!

" In Thee O Lord do I put my trust " ~ Psalm 31:1~

good idea

I'd like to see that.

"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." (Dr. Seuss)

The kids they interviewed

Said it sounded like a "racket" or "someone kicking a door".

Hundreds of rounds of rifle fire would not be described in this way, with semi smiling faces.

_________________________________

Freedom - Peace - Prosperity

Here is the response to just one comment

Here is an example of the response being recieved at the yahoo comment section.

8 users liked this comment Thumbs Up - Thumbs Down 0 users disliked this comment Duane K • 1 hr 3 mins ago

Honorable? Honorable for what? For burning down her law firm's office when under investigation for drug money laundering and fruad in Arkansas? Anyways, it's nice to know that only 4 million viewed the "president's" inaugaration speech while more than 11 million viewed just one video showing sandy hook is a fraudulent event. That is just one of many videos out there by corruption researchers exposing the cancer in our nation. Every American should see the evidence themselves. The corporate/state run "news" will not show the evidence, instead, use their talking heads to discredit and attack the messengers.

It was an article about Clinton testifying....the picture had a big sign in front of her saying "Honorable Hillary Clinton"

I do not claim to know a thing about this, but what was weird is

That the person that directed me to the conspiracy film after describing in detail every aspect of it was one of the biggest statists I know. He has been a life long friend and so far as he is concerned the economy is fine, and its not news unless it is a touchdown or sports highlight of some sort. He spent 30 minutes Monday telling me every detail of this film while I played his role and acted uninterested until he was foaming and with a raised voice said "don't you see"??

If this were a conspiracy I think the left should have employed the help of the PNAC crew to ensure that there was no evidence surrounding the shootings, but I am not sure at this point what really happened. I have heard that many of the parents were Socialist extremists that had children from a children's home enrolled at the school and they were the patsies due to the Florida husband and wife being in the pictures with children of multiple races, and with one of the supposed victims. Killed/sacrificed in a satanic ritualistic manner for the elite and their agenda, which would explain why many couldn't shed a tear while I; a burly red neck, that hunts and fishes cried uncontrollably over my 15 year old hound dog every time I thought about her for 2 weeks when we had to put her to sleep. The children that had legitimate parents were simply caught in the cross fire and cannon fodder for the story line.
The other theory I have read is that it is another false flag by the governments hit men to attack the second amendment where fast and furious failed.
Lastly I heard a recent story that the gunmen were dressed as nuns????

I am one that thinks the tapes need be released of Lanza entering the school, and why not? Beheading's, shootings, and a long list of disturbing material is what the media uses to sell itself, yet to date not so much as a seconds worth of Lanza at the entrance, no video of guns at all, no children running and crying like at Columbine, and just like Osama American's are just to accept what they are told by a media and government that over 60% distrusts?

I will reserve judgement when these tidbits of evidence are released, but in all honesty I feel personally that there is something "not right" about the "official" story, or about what really happened versus the events that the media espoused, but I dare not inject my opinion as I was not there, nor have I seen definitive proof other than people grandstanding for attention.
Release the videos and I might just be sold one way or another, but the longer it takes to release the more I am going to lean to the side of conspiracy when all else is shown on the media.

The author of this post is correct though, people that have rejected even the obvious financial disaster we are headed towards are questioning this shooting, unlike anything I have seen before among people that cared nothing about many questions raised on 9/11.

Always remember:
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." ~ Samuel Adams
If they hate us for our freedom, they must LOVE us now....

Stay IRATE, remain TIRELESS, an

Please stop equating question

Please stop equating question asking with "conspiracy." This is so important. There is nothing wrong with conspiracy, but before one creates a theory, one must first prove that the official story is false. We don't have enough answers to questions to do that yet. But keep asking questions. My question to those who still trust the story is this: Where is the video of this runt breaking down the school's front door?

Well put. Per your request, here is a presidential take on it.

Iconoclast,

Your moniker suits you well. Thank you for your words of wit.

About the door...

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

funny!

funny!

Whenever they pull that BS I have a couple of 1 liners

"Conspiracy is a crime, not a theory"

"You can call me a conspiracy theorist if I can call you a coincidence theorist"

Bam

!

No kidding about the runt.

They describe his as about my size, and I cannot even fire a weapon that big, it knocks me around. I try to imagine putting on all that flak gear, loading up with all that ammo, then strapping on... what are we at these days... 2, 3 or 4 guns, and doing ANYTHING. I would need a hoist to get out of the car. Unless Adam spent all his time in the basement pretending to play video games while he was really pumping iron, I just don't see it.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Thanks Fishy

But an AR-15 has very little recoil and wouldn't knock anyone around.

There was a link on DP

with a radio show having a real discussion about the facts (anyone? can't find it anymore). But they describe Lanza being around 120 lbs, and, when adding in all the ammo, guns, body armor etc he allegedly carried in, it was nearly his weight in gear. So a 120 lb mentally ill and autistic boy carries in 120 lbs of gear, and efficiently moves through the building engaging targets all the while making sure his equipment is working properly. Ok...

it is

powerhour with Mike Powers, if I am not mistaken. If there is another interview, correct me! I'll listen, but I am pretty sure that is it, and it is very good.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

...almost 2 hour interview

...almost 2 hour interview with a former crime scene investigator. I found this interview to be a real eye-opener, bringing new & overlooked irregularities into the conversation;
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/mind-control-1/the-sandy-...
You have to deal with several commercial breaks during the interview, but I found that if you just listen to the host, she'll tell you 'we're coming up to a 4-minute break'...you can push the slider ahead 4 minutes.

I like what someone here suggested

To not use the term "conspiracy theory", but rather "corruption researcher".

lol

Also, as a "corruption researcher", I noticed yesterday a Sandy Hook corruption video on youtube had 11,600,000 views, today same video only had 11,400,000 views. Probably just an error of some sort. Still it's nice to know that only 4 million watched the "president's" inaugaration speech on the three major state run networks.

Correction....

Surely you meant the "imposter president" whose ramblings were nothing but a spewing forth of lies and falsehoods given him from his father the devil who is the father of all lies!

" In Thee O Lord do I put my trust " ~ Psalm 31:1~