The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
2 votes

Assault Weapon At Sandy Hook Or Not? Coroner Vs MSNBC

Explain this to me someone please...
The mainstream media admitted no assault weapons were used in the attack at Sandy Hook. Here is the video for that....

But the coroner who acted very weird as seen in the link at the bottom said there was an assault rifle used:

"In what appeared to be an uncomfortable moment for Carver, he said all of the victims he had examined had all been shot by a Bushmaster .223 caliber assault rifle, one of at least two weapons Adam Lanza, the 20-year-old suspected shooter, used to commit one of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history."

Was there an assault weapon used or not? Who is lying here? The coroner almost looked like he was forced to say there was an assault weapon, then the whitehouse wants to ban assault weapons right after. Every investigator on this case should be immediately fired.

Here is the Creepy stuff from the coroner testimony saying they did use assault weapons....

Someone is not telling the truth here.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

When the coroner answered the question about the weapon

he turned somewhat to the police at hand before he answered. What would that mean?

Maybe he's looking for the thumbs up...

And thinking "Is this what you wanted me to say?" There was another story up today that reported that the guy caught in the bush with a gun was an undercover cop from another county. Really can they keep up with their lies themselves?

2Co 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

Muscle Men

...enforcing the story given them. Holder went there 2 weeks before to issue out the scripts & use his c@rrots & sticks.

It was only the murder weapon, who cares?

So what if media and police and medical examiner stories all conflict, are you demanding to see dead babies? I think that is it...
Yeah, this stinks to high heaven. I could understand if they mistook this rifle for that rifle, or this handgun for that handgun, but mistaking handguns for rifles and rifles for shotguns and not being able to count murder weapons at a murder scene... with the Fed there to help...

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.


So what if their stories conflict? Demanding to see dead babies? That is your conclusions? Perhaps you are a little emotional in responding and for this reason your answer seemed to be so mixed up as to say I was demanding to see dead babies.

One of the points is that the rush has been on against assault weapons when none were used in the Sandy Hook shooting. And then we have to question why the coroner said there were assault weapons used and how this relates to undermining the constitution as well as the continual subversion.

2Co 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

I was being sarcastic.

That is how so many seem to react. Ask a reasonable question, get accused of demanding to see dead babies. I seem to have played "devil's advocate" too well...

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

My apologies....

I guess I misunderstood. I didn't recognize it and I did see the sentences to be a little conflicting. My fault.

2Co 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

Was the coroner acting all creepy....

Because he was being held at gunpoint in order to serve the agenda? He sure was acting strange when answering the questions regarding the assault weapons.

2Co 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.