26 votes

Michelle Malkin: Rand Paul Raised Hope Among Tea Party Conservatives With Clinton Exchange

Michelle Malkin: Rand Paul Raised Hope Among Tea Party Conservatives With Clinton Exchange

Fox News | January 24, 2013

http://youtu.be/jBwO1Loz4Z8



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Rand Paul

Might not be his father, but he is steadfast and consistent.

praise from Malkin would be . . .

anathema to me.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Where there's turd fumes...

there is a pile of crap hidden underneath somewhere. :)

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

Voltaire?

.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

Haha...

did my comment resemble something Voltaire said? o_O

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

Idk because she's a Neo-Con

Idk because she's a Neo-Con and I kinda feel uneasy about them praising him! I mean what about Ron Paul? They hated him for being like this, but now it's amazing because Rand is doing it? Idk how to feel about this guys!

juan maldonado

It's a bridge accept it. It's

It's a bridge accept it. It's our best shot.

Rand!!!

Throw the ring in the lava NOW! Before it's too late... :\

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

He's not arrived at Mount Doom yet...

...still trudging through Mordor. Minas Tirith has to hold, or else Sauron will see him and take back the ring. Incidentally, in this story, you play the steward whose f-ing everything up. :-P

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

I'll repeat...All smears, no substance

She referred to Ron Paul’s supporters as “The baggage that he refuses to rid himself of with all sorts of 9/11 conspiracy nuts, anti-Israel activists and fringe radicals who have weighed down his candidacy.” Her face is repugnant, her name mud, and her delivery of disinfo vacuously sycophantic and MIC-tainted as part of the usual propagandizing effort by the mal-intended fourth branch of government. Expecting anything other than utter sophomoric gibberish from such a twisted neocon is tantamount to masochistic self-immolation.

Michelle Malkin smears Dr. Paul's supporters on Fox News.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9ccaz1UaHo

I'll add Rand needs to take a shower every time she praises him lest the underlying stench of her provocateuring evil lands on him!

I remember Michelle

On the same network saying that Ron Paul has no right to be in the debates and run for President. So Rand takes a page from his dad and now she is on his side proclaiming him (Rand) as a hope for the Teaparty movement.
One question, Where in the hell was she the last few years . Ron nor Rand haven't wavered or changed their strips. She is the only one that is attempting to cling on to a rising star. Too bad she missed out on the r3volution .
No I'm sorry Miss Pretty lips. You'll have to do a little more explaining and correcting of your record and short comings before I'll respect your opinion.
Tbuck just kicked her back to the curb!!

Amen brother! Isn't that why

Amen brother! Isn't that why Alex Jones chased her down and gave her the busy? Lol.. You know that guy from the five keeps mentioning Rand too! I'm sorry I don't trust them!!!

juan maldonado

I remember Michelle

On the same network saying that Ron Paul has no right to be in the debates and run for President. So Rand takes a page from his dad and now she is on his side proclaiming him (Rand) as a hope for the Teaparty movement.
One question, Where in the hell was she the last few years . Ron nor Rand haven't wavered or changed their strips. She is the only one that is attempting to cling on to a rising star. Too bad she missed out on the r3volution .
No I'm sorry Miss Pretty lips. You'll have to do a little more explaining and correcting of your record and short comings before I'll repect your opinion.
Tbuck just kicked her back to the curb!!

If it ain't broke...

The old saying goes, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The Neo-Conservative faction of the party (Hannity, Malkin, O'Reilly et al.) are now putting on a more Libertarian mask as their past philosophy is "broke." We of course can see through this new tactic. Malkin cozying up to Rand Paul. O'Reilly talking more about our economic woes. O'Reilly and Hannity never spoke of the economy when Bush was in power.

Their motto now is, "It is broke so we must fix it by any means, even throwing olive branches to Libertarian leaning voters."

You can bet your last Barackazillion that they won't ever change their war mongering ways. #neo-conservativefail

Author of Buy Gold and Silver Safely
Next book: Illusions of Wealth - due out soon
Also writing book We the Serfs!

Rand has not been assimulated by the Borg

LOVE IT!!!!!

Hillary LIED people died!

i hate michelle malkin with a

i hate michelle malkin with a passion ... we are going to need idiots like this though to sway the sheep vote on the right ... and it appears to be working ... i guess i'll hold my vomit until the commercial break

All paper money eventually returns to its real intrinsic value, zero. - Voltaire

Exactly, these people are

Exactly, these people are usefule tools so no reason why we shouldn't use them to reach their audience. Then when we succeed, let them become irrelevant.

I had the same reaction. We

I had the same reaction. We need useful idiots like Malkin and Hannity to like Rand if he wants any shot at the nomination.

michelle's goal is . .

to make money. thats it. she knows her message has fewer interested folks now so she's trying whatever she can.

Jackson County Georgia

War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson

....

Fuck Michelle Malkin. She was the first to jump on the fuck Ron Paul bandwagon, declaring 'he does not deserve a seat on that stage.'

Motherfuck her. Jussayin. Opportunistic weasel.

'Peace is a powerful message.' Ron Paul

IT's too bad msm is not

IT's too bad msm is not reporting the heated exchange between Jeff Duncan and Clinton...an excellent barrage of Q&A'a which successfully put Clinton on the defensive without answer. The hype over Rand Paul is undeserved. He has become a tool for GOP, disgusting as they are, and Ron Paul supporters are being manipulated with his artificial stardom.

I used to debate

the Malkin crowd over at hotair.com and michellemalkin.com heading into the 2008 election, and in the beginning was accused of being a "leftist" because I was anti-war. I had to clarify each of my responses with a statement, "I am not a Leftist" before replying. This confused many of them because they weren't used to someone who wasn't a leftist critiquing their (Fox News media driven) point of view.

I challenged any of them to a debate during that 2008 election, their candidate versus mine (Ron Paul). I had only one taker. It was a civilized debate where I was able to relay the positions of Paul. He chose Rudy Giuliani. In the end, like with all neo-conservatives, we agreed to disagree on the foreign policy issue. Of course now, 5 years later, the folks at Malkin's site, Fox News, and of course the Glenn Beck worshipers, have seen the consequences of too much spending. Too bad their elected officials in Congress still have not with their giving in to Democrats despite holding control of the House. Pathetic.

Author of Buy Gold and Silver Safely
Next book: Illusions of Wealth - due out soon
Also writing book We the Serfs!

I don't disagree, but let's

I don't disagree, but let's get Rand in. In my opinion that's more important than old grudges. Hell, I'll even send a nice e-mail to Hannity if he helps get Rand elected. And THAT would be like me pulling my own wisdom teeth.

No...

let's spread the message that the wars must stop (the real issue here) and that 99% of the Govt needs to be replaced with individual self-reliance and the freedom to do self-reliant things.

Screw Rand and stupid political offices. Political offices are the problem...

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

First of all, I'm not an

First of all, I'm not an anarchist. Second of all I am a realist. So you push what you want and the rest of us will live in reality.

Bro...

I'm a minarchist. Just like Ron. I'm repeating his message verbatim. You should read his books sometimes. :)

Jefferson, the Old Right and the anti-Federalists are my "heroes"...

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

Oh I know why, because you

Oh I know why, because you want to completely replace the government. That won't and can't happen. I'm a minarchist but it looks to me that you are advocating anarchism. I dunno. *shrug*

I am wanting...

to return to the time when Congress only met for several weeks every year. And Congress was boring. Because they didn't have much to do. :D

Sue me...

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

I wouldn't mind that either

I wouldn't mind that either but the states would have more control. I'm fine with that though because we can move freely throughout the states. Honestly, the constitution was just like you and I wanted before the civil war. After that tyrant Lincoln it all went to hell.

Freeing the slaves, fine, good on ya, bro. Suspending habaes corpus, initiating a draft, allowing rich people to pay to get out of the draft, attacking states who were within their rights to secede, declaring war on his own countrymen, allowing 600K American men to die over something as frivilous as a nation state, raping American women, killing American children.......

Nah, it was not until after the Civil War that this country got fucked up. After that it all went to hell.
It has never been right since.
Slavery would have ended regardless.
Slavery was just an excuse.

In any case,
Yes, I prefer we follow the 10th amendment. But for right now, Rand is our best hope for anything close to that.

I have them all and have read

I have them all and have read them all. Not sure what you mean. Your post looked pretty anarchist to me. If I misread it, then fine, I'm sorry. I have 2 other douchebags I've been dealing with. Not that you are. I just mean I'm dealing with other people and not reading closely. If I misread then accept my apology.