39 votes

Rand Paul 2016 campaign - who is with me?

Senator Rand Paul is on fire!
It looks to me like he already started his 2016 campaign with successful attacks against his potential opponents.

Liberty patriots activists let's jump-start Rand Paul 2016 presidential campaign - who is with me?

https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/522366_226675287...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Rand

is a sellout who back stabbed his Dad early in the game, severely hurting Ron's chances to win more state conventions. Prince Reibus cheated us Ron Paul delegates in legitimately nominating Ron at Tampa. Rand tacitly endorsed Prince Reibus to continue as RNC chair (how many other senators commented on that election?) His NDAA efforts were fraudulent, he voted for sanctions, he claims an attack on Israel is an attack on the US, he voted for John Kerry. The list goes on. Rand 2016? No way!

AD in NV

Tom Woods 2016!

Nobody can as unapologetically take up the mantle of spreading the message of Liberty like Tom! :)

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

Nobody knows who Tom Woods is...

...outside of Paulite circles. Not even all Paulites know who he is. That might be a nice educational campaign, but it is not a serious political campaign with a chance of success.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

Nobody knew...

who Ron Paul was in 2007 except a few Alex Jones listeners and libertarians. Hence:

"Who is Ron Paul?" and "Google Ron Paul" memes

Tom Woods is a captivating speaker that connects with the Old Right and the christian right in addition to his ancap base.

Ron Paul didn't win but he is the reason you are on DailyPaul right now. Also notice that I didn't say "to win a political office", I said "spreading the message of liberty".

Rand is covering the job of "appearing to agree with zionists and neocons" very well so we don't need to duplicate his "role". We are lacking somebody boldly and unapologetically spreading the message of liberty...

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

As I said...

...a Tom Woods campaign might be good for educating people, but not for winning. The fact that you compare him to Ron Paul only proves my point, doesn't it?

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

Great Candidate for 2016

If Rand cant win the general much less the primary, who the hell would, honestly. Well except for the man that Fox news promotes the most. He is well versed in history, finance, and limited government people. I would love to see him demolish Hillary or the idiot Biden in a debate of substance! As I said in another thread, he would bring balanced budgets, troops home from the sandbox, transparent govnt, constitutional principles, and until his life is threatened by the powers that be, maybe an end to the Fed! I hope he would mainly call on the parties to have HONEST debates btw!

That's my thought too. If

That's my thought too. If Rand can't win, nobody could.

Rand cant win the GOP nomination and.......

definetly could not win a general election due to his constitutional conservative stances. The conservatives have lost, lets just face that fact Things could change along with some form of financial calamity, but, of course, there is no guarantee that would bring conservatives back into power. I will support Rand if he decides to vie for nomination and would vote for him in the general though. What will/would hurt Rand most is his past comments relative to constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act relative to property rights, limited government views and traditional marriage. The general populace has accepted big government and rejected traditional conservative views in the area of social policies. Human knowledge and power and subjects such as evolution spell the eventual death of social conservatives and Nixon's "we are all kensyians now" meant that fiscal conservatives will not come to power in the politics of the our country as it is now. Rand is on the losing side of both fiscal and social issues. However, I hope that he can keep his senate position because his views, to me, are important to be included in national debate.

More young voters

Rand Paul is the next J.F.K. (Mitt Romney was Richard Nixon B.T.W)

Senator Peter Schiff 2016

the youth doesn't like him

they prefer gary johnson as a second choice after ron & who can blame them. he lacks both charisma, and principles.
he's more like quayle than jfk.
as despicable as nixon was mittens is an empty suit with zero legacy. rand btw was certain of a romney victory. ..

---

It is up to you. It is up to me. It is up to the voting Americans, and what they want this nation to be.

If you are not working with me, Ron and others at local/state, promoting Liberty and Freedom to everybody around you, then it is time to GET BUSY.

If you can not see a clear path in front of you, begin walking a straight line. You will see it soon enough.

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

until i hear Rand Paul says he will destroy...

the drone program(unless a declaration of war) and end the fed... i am not interested!...At all!

He's introduced legislation....

...to require warrants for drone surveillance. The drone isn't going to be un-invented: it's there. What we can do is make sure the government doesn't use them for unconstitutional searches.

As for the Fed, his bill to audit it is the same as Ron Paul's. It's well understood (or ought to be) that this is a first step on the road to abolishing the Fed.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

If Rand Paul

keeps kissing the ass of Zionists, he's going to need a pair of knee pads!

"The problem is not those in power, the problem is right between your ears." ~Larken Rose

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5FNDRgPOLs&list=FL4wdZ0dK3HG...

Rand,

at best, is a gradualist, Ron a radical.

Where does gradualism get us? According to William Lloyd Garrison, "Gradualism in theory is perpetuity in practice."

Where has radicalism got us?

Nowhere. We've made almost no progress in actually turning back the establishment's agenda. Whereas the establishment has made enormous progress over the decades in pushing that agenda through gradualism.

It's fine to compromise on means, as long as we don't compromise on ends. In other words, be radical in defining the goal (free society), but practical in the strategy you choose for reaching it (gradualism, radicalism - whatever works).

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

seriously?

for starters our independent from england. every change against the establishment is first called radical.
the vietnam war was ended by so called radical elements.

gradualism basically means nothing ever really gets done.

and you know what? there one huge difference between father and son. & without being his son he would be just one more play along politician. no thanks.

Look at recent history: Ron Paul's 3 campaigns

They were very successful in educating people, but none of them came close to winning the election. We need to win elections. It is evident to me that no one who *appears* as radical as Ron is going to win. We need someone like Rand who can play the game and appeal to more mainstream voters.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

The table has turned.

It is not Ron Paul or us that are radicals. It is the leftist nwo that are in fact radicals, extremists, for wanting to destroy this Republic and the Constitution.

It is time that WE begin calling things as they really are. Not only here, but in public.

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

so long as he makes real inquiries on top issues

so long as he makes real inquiries on top issues like the entire interview with sen. Kerry.
but sometimes he makes pot shots at stupid issues and comes down strong on a weird point about it, and it is just plain awkward for the liberty movement.

he posted on FB

45 mins ago. Over 16,000 likes and 1500+ comments.

Not bad. Before the election he wasn't hitting numbers like that. Chewing out Hillary had to help him huge.

'Peace is a powerful message.' Ron Paul

Oh those kooky Rand Paul

Oh those kooky Rand Paul supporters!

married to the mob

read this and figure it OUT.

The Mob - the jewish organized criminal cartel... the kosher nostra is gunning for Rand. That's why he had to shuttle over to Tel Aviv to pay his respects to the Dons.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/01/28/las-vegas-godfather-...

I am totally in

I wish some of the people that like to yell about Rand endorsing romney would give it a rest. It is like you are determined for us to fail...Ron Paul has endorsed numerous neocons throughout his career. Look it up...It is actually quite appalling to watch a bunch of people yell about Rand Paul not being Ron Paul when the Dr. himself has endorsed numerous asshats. It is politics...get over it. Secondly, if you paid attention to what he has been doing..he is much more strategic in trying to accomplish what is right for the country. Iran sanctions? Well, he basically changed the legislation so the sanctions had no teeth. Seems like a pretty good idea when it is going to pass anyway. Rig the dam piece of legislation so it is harmless. Just look it up....what happened to people "researching" in the liberty movement? I for one will fully support Rand Paul. I also believe that he will get more of the soft support that Ron Paul couldn't get. I have no idea what some of you are actually looking for. I honestly thought that non liberty minded voters were just clueless when they called Ron Paul supporters cult followers, etc. Now I am starting to understand why they say that. It is like some are living in a vacuum. Rand Paul would be the best president we have had in over a hundred years. Our country, your lives, your children...will be a million times better off then another big government bozo taking office. I sure hope that some of you go and listen to Dr. Paul between now and 2016. I can guarantee he will be endorsing his own damn son.

He is a republican

What was he supposed to say?

I am registered

republican, and I didn't endorse Romney, nor did I vote for Romney. Rand is a sell out who committed "political patricide". Severe lack of integrity. Not fit for POTUS, unless you want more back stabbing self serving sellouts.

AD in NV

when it comes down to it

he'll say what they want him to say (see RNC speech)

and this is a monumental difference between father & son (also a republican) ..

What?

I did watch the RNC speech. He did not just say what they wanted him to say. I thought he did a pretty good job considering what I am sure they WANTED him to say. Again, if we are to win..we need to get some libertarian concepts into the mainstream. We can't win any other way. If we are to win, Rand is going to have to appeal to conservatives.

Yes.

Yes.